QUOTE (Nimbus @ Wed, 17 Oct 2007 - 23:58)
So bear in mind NPAS do like to be seen to be fair if not impartial (55 pence given to NPAS for every ticket issued).
Except they don't want to kill the goose that laid the golden egg now, would they? PCN's pay their wages and I am sure they are very handsome indeed. Adjudicators will if they are going to find in your favour will pick the least controversial point for you to win on. This then allows the council to carry on issuing invalid, illegal, non compliant PCN's for the same points you may have originally raised because they didn't adjudicate on that.
QUOTE (spaceman @ Thu, 18 Oct 2007 - 18:01)
You do know that one adjudicator's decision is not binding on another?
And how ludicrous is that. If an adjudicator finds a particular point invalid, illegal, non compliant then why should that not be set in stone?
Seems like an adjudicators job is jobs for the boys because they can revisit the same points over and over again just churning PCN's just for the money.