Posting on behalf of a friend.
Received a NIP (in time) alleging a red light offence. He is the RK and remembers being the driver in the location at the time, but denies that the light was red. He asked for the photographic evidence.
The first photo shows his vehicle ACROSS the white line with the time elapsed since the light went red as 0.6seconds. The second photo obviously shows him further across the junction at 1.5 seconds since the light went red, calculated speed <25 mph.
Surely 0.6s is a bit harsh? Especially as he hadn't actually crossed the line with the whole vehicle?
I'm sure the police would say that RED is not the signal to stop, the AMBER should have given him a clue. Even though, this doesn't seem right?