PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

[NIP Wizard] Manchester, Mancunian way
Alfieboo
post Sun, 15 Mar 2009 - 18:56
Post #1


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 15 Mar 2009
Member No.: 27,026



NIP Details and Circumstances
What is the name of the Constabulary? -
Date of the offence: - January 2009
Date of the NIP: - 32 days after the offence
Date you received the NIP: - 34 days after the offence
Location of offence (exact location as it appears on the NIP: important): - A635 MANCUNIAN WAY, MANCHESTER
Was the NIP addressed to you? - Yes
Was the NIP sent by first class post, second class or recorded delivery? - Not known
If your are not the Registered Keeper, what is your relationship to the vehicle? - COMPANY CAR
How many current points do you have? - 0
Provide a description of events (if you know what happened) telling us as much about the incident as possible - some things that may seem trivial to you may be important, so don't leave anything out. Please do not post personal details for obvious reasons - I was on the Dual Carriageway which has a 50 speed limit and (M) status on a small section. The road goes into a 40 limit before the lights at the end of the carriageway. There is no fixed camera but is a camera warning sign so I am assuming that it was a mobile unit. It doesn't give you much chance to brake safely especially when conditions are icy. I was apparently doing 48mph at the time of the offence.

NIP Wizard Responses
These were the responses used by the Wizard to arrive at its recommendation:
Have you received a NIP? - Yes
Are you the Registered Keeper of the vehicle concerned (is your name and address on the V5/V5C)? - No
Is the NIP addressed to you personally? - Yes
Although you are not the Registered Keeper, were you the keeper of the vehicle concerned (the person normally responsible for it) at the time of the alleged offence? - Yes
Were you driving? - Yes
Which country did the alleged offence take place in? - England

NIP Wizard Recommendation
Based on these responses the Wizard suggested that this course of action should be considered:
  • The law requires you to provide the information requested in the Section 172 notice within the 28 day period, naming yourself as the driver. If you are considering obtaining formal legal advice, do so before returning the notice.

    You should note that there is nothing to be gained by responding any earlier than you have to at any stage of the process. You are likely to receive a Conditional Offer of a Fixed Penalty (COFP) and further reminder(s). If you want to continue the fight, you should ignore all correspondence from the police until you receive a summons. You need to understand from the outset that while you will receive much help and support from members on the forums, you will need to put time and effort into fighting your case and ultimately be prepared to stand up in court to defend yourself.

Generated by the PePiPoo NIP Wizard v3.3.2: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:56:26 +0000
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 2)
Advertisement
post Sun, 15 Mar 2009 - 18:56
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
jobo
post Mon, 16 Mar 2009 - 00:02
Post #2


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 13,506
Joined: 9 Jan 2008
From: manchester
Member No.: 16,521



was this the openshaw end of the mancy way

write and ask for picies to help id the driver not proof or evidence, wash any id date time etc of them and post on here

then we will know what got you and from where and if there are any prob with the ping, you still have to return the 172 within 28 days

are there 40 signs both sides of the carriageway


--------------------
jobo

anyone but Murray, Wish granted for another year,
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Rookie
post Mon, 16 Mar 2009 - 09:19
Post #3


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 43,658
Joined: 9 Sep 2003
From: Warwickshire
Member No.: 317



The road goes into a 40 limit before the lights at the end of the carriageway. There is no fixed camera but is a camera warning sign so I am assuming that it was a mobile unit. It doesn't give you much chance to brake safely especially when conditions are icy. I was apparently doing 48mph at the time of the offence.
[/quote]

I don't think as mitigation goes that works very well, I was speeding because it was icey!

Simon


--------------------
There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!

S172's
Rookies 1-0 Kent

Council PCN's
Rookies 1-0 Warwick
Rookies 1-0 Birmingham

PPC PCN's
Rookies 10-0 PPC's
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Friday, 17th January 2020 - 22:57
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.