PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

£260 PCN and Towing fine from Hackney Council, Can you help me reclaim my money
JMH
post Wed, 17 Dec 2008 - 14:23
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Member No.: 24,901



Hello,

Another user was towed from exactly the same street in Hackney and roughly the same time on a different date. He managed to get his money back and I just wonder if anyone can help me? I'm attaching my PCN's and all the information I was given by the car pound. I want to appeal and wonder what your thoughts are on how best to proceed.

The previous post can be found here:
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showto...t=0&start=0

My situation is almost identical. Same street, similar time. I however have not yet appealed and any help would be incredibly useful.
The fact is that this area is apparently a controlled zone. However the signs on the street are somewhat misleading. I parked on a single yellow at after 9pm which normally in London is fine. There were no immediate notices to say otherwise. I left the car for twenty minutes and when I returned it was gone. The ticket was issued at 22:08 and the car was towed at 22:15. I spoke to the man at the car pound who said that this was a popular street for towing cars from - no doubt because it's a quiet and wide street.

I'm shocked at the amount and Hackney's vast sum of money for towing the car 15 minutes away to the pound. £260.

Any help would be enormously appreciated.

PCN Front:

PCN Reverse:

PCN Receipt:

Blank Hackney Appeal form front:

Blank Hackney Appeal form second page:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 19)
Advertisement
post Wed, 17 Dec 2008 - 14:23
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
dave-o
post Wed, 17 Dec 2008 - 14:27
Post #2


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 10,292
Joined: 7 Jan 2008
From: London
Member No.: 16,454



NeilB will be your man here.

I can't see how those appeal docs are adequate....


--------------------
Dave-o 3-0 LB Waltham Forest.
Goalscorers: B. Alighting 08', G. Fettered 34', I. Markings 42'


Dave-o 2-0 LB Islington
Goalscorers: V. Locus 82', I. Dates, 87'


Dave-o 1-0 LB Redbridge
Goalscorer: I. Markings 79'


Dave-o 1-0 LB sCamden
Goalscorer: I. Dates, 86'
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Glacier2
post Wed, 17 Dec 2008 - 14:52
Post #3


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 6,668
Joined: 23 Apr 2004
From: Not in the UK
Member No.: 1,131



Indeed, those docs are inadequate. 1 form is missing, the one that explains the appeals procedure.



--------------------
NOTICE The content of this post and of any replies to it may assist in or relate to the formulation of strategy tactics etcetera in a legal action. This post and any replies to it should therefore be assumed to be legally privileged and therefore must not be disclosed, copied, quoted, discussed, used or referred to outside of the PePiPoo forum on which it was originally posted additionally it must not be disclosed, copied, quoted, discussed, used or referred to by any person or organisation other than a member of PePiPoo appropriately paid up and in full compliance with the PePiPoo terms of use for the forum on which it was originally posted. The PePiPoo terms of use can be found at http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?act=boardrules. For the avoidance of doubt, if you are reading this material in any form other than an on-line HTML resource directly and legitimately accessed via a URL commencing "http://forums.pepipoo.com" then it has been obtained by improper means and you are probably reading it in breach of legal privilege. If the material you are reading does not include this notice then it has been obtained improperly and you are probably reading it in breach of legal privilege. Your attention is drawn to the Written Standards for the Conduct of Professional Work issued by the Bar Standards Board particularly under heading 7, "Documents". Any advice given is taken at your own risk and no liability is accepted if things go wrong.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neil B
post Wed, 17 Dec 2008 - 15:01
Post #4


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 5,662
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671



Just appeal along the lines of the guidance given to John.

Keep us updated.

If you want to run a draft appeal past us - feel free.

-



--------------------
20th June 2009.

Please note, due to new commitments I will not be able to visit the forum so frequently. I do have a note from my Mum.

Direct approaches via PM or e-mail or 'in thread' shouts for my particular input may not be responded to. There are plenty of more knowledgable people here to help. Good luck everyone.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JMH
post Wed, 17 Dec 2008 - 15:20
Post #5


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Member No.: 24,901



Thanks Neil,

I was interested in your advice to John that read : "Pics of the CPZ sign will be interesting and you should note that there must be one at each entrance to the CPZ (Zone B North) and on both sides of the street."

There are signs on the entrance, but not on both sides of the street. Perhaps this is the best main argument to make?

Can you explain what PATAS is and should I go straight there or fill this appeal form in first?

Many thanks

James
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dave-o
post Wed, 17 Dec 2008 - 15:29
Post #6


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 10,292
Joined: 7 Jan 2008
From: London
Member No.: 16,454



You have to make the informal council appeal first. After that if they refuse you'll go to PATAS. The missing appeal information is your strongest point so far IMO but if you have irregularities with CPZ signs then it's extra ammo.


--------------------
Dave-o 3-0 LB Waltham Forest.
Goalscorers: B. Alighting 08', G. Fettered 34', I. Markings 42'


Dave-o 2-0 LB Islington
Goalscorers: V. Locus 82', I. Dates, 87'


Dave-o 1-0 LB Redbridge
Goalscorer: I. Markings 79'


Dave-o 1-0 LB sCamden
Goalscorer: I. Dates, 86'
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neil B
post Wed, 17 Dec 2008 - 15:30
Post #7


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 5,662
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671



PATAS is the Adjudicator, the ultimate decision maker on getting your money back. Hackney cannot possibly go there with this without getting torn to shreds. You cannot go directly to them.

The CPZ sign issue became relevant for another victim (there are 23+ towing cases and at least 4 Hackney) Think it was 'Armitageshanksjjnr' find it.

Crucial and most relevant appeal point is that Hackney fail to comply with Reg 11 of the Reps and Appeals Regs.

Open your letter with as suggested to others - 'I am appealing in this manner because you have not informed me of the correct procedure for doing so'

Open next with any signage issues, etc. , general whinge about being towed and then slam-dunk it with the legal failure.

Post your draft here.

-



--------------------
20th June 2009.

Please note, due to new commitments I will not be able to visit the forum so frequently. I do have a note from my Mum.

Direct approaches via PM or e-mail or 'in thread' shouts for my particular input may not be responded to. There are plenty of more knowledgable people here to help. Good luck everyone.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JMH
post Wed, 17 Dec 2008 - 15:44
Post #8


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Member No.: 24,901



Ahh Neil, I didn't think I'd manage to smile about this - but you're quite clearly a legend. Thanks so much for the advice. I'll post my draft this evening.

Many, many thanks

JMH
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Teufel
post Wed, 17 Dec 2008 - 16:41
Post #9


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 6,783
Joined: 6 Jul 2006
Member No.: 6,518



same as the post u refer to -they have wholly failed to inform of yr rights of appeal

cannot posisbly be fair

appela and then to adjudicator

ask for costs this is wholly unreasonable
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JMH
post Thu, 18 Dec 2008 - 17:13
Post #10


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Member No.: 24,901



Hello all,

This is my first draft, please do let me know your thoughts,

Many thanks
JMH


I am appealing in this manner because you have not informed me of the correct procedure for doing so.

At 21:45 on the evening of 16th December I parked my car on Garden Walk. I parked on a single yellow line and looked for any signage to check for restrictions. I could find none in the immediate vicinity and include a photograph to prove this.

On my return to Garden Walk at 22:20 my car was gone. I called the police and then the tracking service they recommended. I was aghast to find it had been towed away.

I was also stupefied to find out that Hackney Council had removed my car to a pound outside of the council's perimeters costing me a taxi ride amounting to nearly fifty pounds.

I paid the extortionate sum of £260 including a £60 fine and £200 worth of towing (the cost of which seems wholly unjustifiable) and got my car back just one hour and one minute after you had removed it.

I had a conversation with one of your attendants who goes by the name of 1053. He revealed that Garden Walk is one of your most popular towing locations in the whole of Hackney. I imagine this is the because it's a quiet and wide street perfect for your trucks and because like me, many others are confused by your lack of signage. I have explored this matter in some detail an understand that any controlled zones must have CPZ signs at every entry point on both sides of the road. Your parking zone on Garden Walk does not meet this criteria and therefore you cannot legally enforce this penalty.

In addition you have failed to provide me with the proper information and to inform me of my rights to appeal and the process that appeal will take. This amounts to a legal failure on your behalf and I therefore ask you for the prompt return of £260

just spotted a typo actually... so please ignore that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cabbyman
post Thu, 18 Dec 2008 - 19:22
Post #11


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 971
Joined: 15 Dec 2007
From: Hampshire
Member No.: 16,066



Did you get a receipt for the taxi fare?

PPPers: Could he claim back his taxi fare?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neil B
post Thu, 18 Dec 2008 - 23:13
Post #12


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 5,662
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671



QUOTE (cabbyman @ Thu, 18 Dec 2008 - 19:22) *
Did you get a receipt for the taxi fare?

PPPers: Could he claim back his taxi fare?


Whether or not he/she can claim the fare and other expenses if it were to proceed to adjudication is down to how Hackney behave from hereon in.


£50 seems a bit excessive for such a trip?

Appeal is fine as far as I am concerned. It's lacking a bit of detail but it really doesn't matter because we already know Hackney are going to reject you at this stage.

-



--------------------
20th June 2009.

Please note, due to new commitments I will not be able to visit the forum so frequently. I do have a note from my Mum.

Direct approaches via PM or e-mail or 'in thread' shouts for my particular input may not be responded to. There are plenty of more knowledgable people here to help. Good luck everyone.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JMH
post Thu, 18 Dec 2008 - 23:16
Post #13


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Member No.: 24,901



Neil, what detail shall I add? Do let me know. It would be good to record it at this stage for my own records. Many thanks
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neil B
post Thu, 18 Dec 2008 - 23:20
Post #14


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 5,662
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671



I think it will do fine as it is. You are not understanding, we know they are going to reject you anyway, they did the previous three!

don't waste ink IMO.

Wait and see what others think first if you want. Good people here.



--------------------
20th June 2009.

Please note, due to new commitments I will not be able to visit the forum so frequently. I do have a note from my Mum.

Direct approaches via PM or e-mail or 'in thread' shouts for my particular input may not be responded to. There are plenty of more knowledgable people here to help. Good luck everyone.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neil B
post Fri, 19 Dec 2008 - 13:41
Post #15


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 5,662
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671



In answer to your PM - send your own letter - just head it up with dates and PCN number, VRM etc.

Keep hold of that ridiculous excuse of an appeal form of theirs!!!

-

Best to hand deliver and get receipt.

-



--------------------
20th June 2009.

Please note, due to new commitments I will not be able to visit the forum so frequently. I do have a note from my Mum.

Direct approaches via PM or e-mail or 'in thread' shouts for my particular input may not be responded to. There are plenty of more knowledgable people here to help. Good luck everyone.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cabbyman
post Fri, 19 Dec 2008 - 19:03
Post #16


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 971
Joined: 15 Dec 2007
From: Hampshire
Member No.: 16,066



QUOTE (Neil B @ Thu, 18 Dec 2008 - 23:13) *
QUOTE (cabbyman @ Thu, 18 Dec 2008 - 19:22) *
Did you get a receipt for the taxi fare?

PPPers: Could he claim back his taxi fare?


Whether or not he/she can claim the fare and other expenses if it were to proceed to adjudication is down to how Hackney behave from hereon in.


£50 seems a bit excessive for such a trip?

Appeal is fine as far as I am concerned. It's lacking a bit of detail but it really doesn't matter because we already know Hackney are going to reject you at this stage.

-




I'm not aware of the taxi fares in London but, if someone could provide pick-up and drop-off points, I'll certainly be happy to make enquiries elsewhere.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JMH
post Fri, 23 Jan 2009 - 15:23
Post #17


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Member No.: 24,901



Hello everyone. Today I've received my rejection letter from Hackney Council. They don't appear to have properly read my appeal letter. Oh well. I'll post the documents they have sent me now and wait for your guidance as to how to pursue this further. Many thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neil B
post Fri, 23 Jan 2009 - 15:31
Post #18


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 5,662
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671



Another Cilla Black moment.

Don't worry. just scan the rejection letter in on it's own. Don't need to see the PATAS forms - which I presume they sent?

you're just gonna be following the others but a long wait I'm afraid.

-



--------------------
20th June 2009.

Please note, due to new commitments I will not be able to visit the forum so frequently. I do have a note from my Mum.

Direct approaches via PM or e-mail or 'in thread' shouts for my particular input may not be responded to. There are plenty of more knowledgable people here to help. Good luck everyone.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JMH
post Fri, 23 Jan 2009 - 15:40
Post #19


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Member No.: 24,901



here are the documents i received today.















Sorry - just read your post. Scanned the PATAS forms anyway. How long does this process take? £260 is a lot of money not to have in the bank right now. Many thanks
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Glacier2
post Fri, 23 Jan 2009 - 15:41
Post #20


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 6,668
Joined: 23 Apr 2004
From: Not in the UK
Member No.: 1,131



Pro forma rejection letter.

Take it all the way.


--------------------
NOTICE The content of this post and of any replies to it may assist in or relate to the formulation of strategy tactics etcetera in a legal action. This post and any replies to it should therefore be assumed to be legally privileged and therefore must not be disclosed, copied, quoted, discussed, used or referred to outside of the PePiPoo forum on which it was originally posted additionally it must not be disclosed, copied, quoted, discussed, used or referred to by any person or organisation other than a member of PePiPoo appropriately paid up and in full compliance with the PePiPoo terms of use for the forum on which it was originally posted. The PePiPoo terms of use can be found at http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?act=boardrules. For the avoidance of doubt, if you are reading this material in any form other than an on-line HTML resource directly and legitimately accessed via a URL commencing "http://forums.pepipoo.com" then it has been obtained by improper means and you are probably reading it in breach of legal privilege. If the material you are reading does not include this notice then it has been obtained improperly and you are probably reading it in breach of legal privilege. Your attention is drawn to the Written Standards for the Conduct of Professional Work issued by the Bar Standards Board particularly under heading 7, "Documents". Any advice given is taken at your own risk and no liability is accepted if things go wrong.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Thursday, 9th September 2010 - 15:07