PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

52g Rotherhithe Tunnel new restriction, got 9 tickets
Optik
post Wed, 12 Jun 2019 - 16:50
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: 23 Jun 2010
Member No.: 38,479



Good day everyone.
My vehicle is leased and usualy leasing company pays the fines. This time around they have let the fines go my way. It goes to a shared property and since the company name was spelt differently on the letters i was left on the floor for ages. We only used to use it for the postal purposes of our company.
So here I am looking on 9 tickets whitch i technicaly recived on the same day. Or made aware of.
I do not use the tunnel very often (but used it friquently yers ago) so did not pay attension to the 2T sign, espessialy looking at all the large van drivers happyly driving in it at the same time as I.
Is there anything could be done?

1. company name spelt diferently on the letters
2. Vehicle is Navara gross 3.5t 4x4

This post has been edited by Optik: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 - 16:53
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image


Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image


Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 9)
Advertisement
post Wed, 12 Jun 2019 - 16:50
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Irksome
post Thu, 13 Jun 2019 - 10:33
Post #2


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 347
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
From: sw11
Member No.: 38,303



Oldest PCN date 31st May so you have little time to get your representations in. Can you elaborate on the mis-spelling, is it trivial or substantial?

Also please read http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showto...t=0&start=0
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stamfordman
post Thu, 13 Jun 2019 - 10:39
Post #3


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 10,547
Joined: 12 Feb 2013
From: London
Member No.: 59,924



"Vehicle is Navara gross 3.5t 4x4"

It's way over the 2t limit. Are there other better signed 2t limits that you do see and act on.

This post has been edited by stamfordman: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 - 10:41
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Foxy01
post Thu, 13 Jun 2019 - 11:35
Post #4


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 66
Joined: 4 Mar 2016
Member No.: 82,764



Why would it be a 'goods vehicle' and not a 'dual purpose' vehicle? If a dual purpose why would you look for weight restrictions on goods vehicles?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PASTMYBEST
post Thu, 13 Jun 2019 - 11:57
Post #5


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 16,436
Joined: 6 Nov 2014
Member No.: 74,048



What does it say it is on the V%C


--------------------
All advice is given freely. It is given without guarantee and responsibility for its use rests with the user
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Optik
post Thu, 13 Jun 2019 - 19:29
Post #6


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: 23 Jun 2010
Member No.: 38,479



QUOTE (Irksome @ Thu, 13 Jun 2019 - 10:33) *
Oldest PCN date 31st May so you have little time to get your representations in. Can you elaborate on the mis-spelling, is it trivial or substantial?

Also please read http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showto...t=0&start=0


The company name is ENKO, They spelt ENcO on a few of the letters. I have left the company name on the letters attached.

QUOTE (Foxy01 @ Thu, 13 Jun 2019 - 11:35) *
Why would it be a 'goods vehicle' and not a 'dual purpose' vehicle? If a dual purpose why would you look for weight restrictions on goods vehicles?


This I dont know. If I could claim it to be a dual purpose vehicle, that would be usefull?

This post has been edited by Optik: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 - 19:32
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Optik
post Thu, 13 Jun 2019 - 22:49
Post #7


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: 23 Jun 2010
Member No.: 38,479



QUOTE (PASTMYBEST @ Thu, 13 Jun 2019 - 11:57) *
What does it say it is on the V%C

this is a leased vehicle. I do not have a V5
But on VE103A it sais : Max permissible mass 3045
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Irksome
post Fri, 14 Jun 2019 - 08:17
Post #8


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 347
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
From: sw11
Member No.: 38,303



With regards to the few PCNs with a misspelt company name, I can’t see how these can be enforced against a company that doesn’t exist?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
roythebus
post Fri, 14 Jun 2019 - 19:25
Post #9


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 5,366
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
From: Near Calais
Member No.: 9,683



GSV isn't particularly helpful as it shows the signage dated May 2018, which has MGW 17.5T heading north, along with ehight and width restrictions. I know there's a 2 T limit and the entrance has been altered to make it very difficult for anything big to get through the barriers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Foxy01
post Fri, 14 Jun 2019 - 20:44
Post #10


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 66
Joined: 4 Mar 2016
Member No.: 82,764



QUOTE (roythebus @ Fri, 14 Jun 2019 - 20:25) *
GSV isn't particularly helpful as it shows the signage dated May 2018, which has MGW 17.5T heading north, along with ehight and width restrictions. I know there's a 2 T limit and the entrance has been altered to make it very difficult for anything big to get through the barriers.

There are photos of the signs here: http://forums.pepipoo.com/lofiversion/index.php/t126379.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Sunday, 16th June 2019 - 02:02
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.