PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Over £3.5k Claim, Help appreciated!
oasis786
post Sat, 6 Jan 2018 - 17:54
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 6 Jan 2018
Member No.: 95,828



Hi everyone,

Having visited the hospital every day for around 18 months, I have paid for many many tickets at QA Hospital in Portsmouth.

If anyone has visited here, they will know the parking is a nightmare. Friends also used the car in question very frequently and to cut a long story short, I didn't get any of the mail until recently I got this letter..

https://s14.postimg.org/s2decjyc1/IMG_8787-blank.jpg

Would love some help with this and what route to take. The Carillion attendants here really have it in for me. Ticket the car within a few minutes now. There was actually one time where I dropped somebody off and the attendant blocked me from leaving. I was in the driver seat the whole time and the car was always running. The attendant then threw the ticket through the window at me and told me to have a nice day!

Thank you in advance

This post has been edited by oasis786: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 - 12:59
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
5 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 >  
Start new topic
Replies (60 - 79)
Advertisement
post Sat, 6 Jan 2018 - 17:54
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Colin_S
post Tue, 9 Jan 2018 - 12:46
Post #61


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 291
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Member No.: 59,321



Is there any mileage in requesting a copy of the contract between the landowner and the parking contractor?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eclipse_alpha
post Tue, 9 Jan 2018 - 12:59
Post #62


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 119
Joined: 8 May 2013
Member No.: 61,704



QUOTE (ostell @ Tue, 9 Jan 2018 - 11:56) *
I haven't got the details for contacting the DVLA.


I complained to ccrt@dvla.gsi.gov.uk and they responded from KADOEservice.support@dvla.gsi.gov.uk.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
emanresu
post Tue, 9 Jan 2018 - 13:07
Post #63


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 11,094
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
From: Home alone
Member No.: 13,324



QUOTE
Is there any mileage in requesting a copy of the contract between the landowner and the parking contractor?


Lots of information here

http://www.porthosp.nhs.uk/about-us/news-a...ure_Log1617.htm


QUOTE
1. Are your carparks managed by a private contractor? If yes, please provide the name of the contractor.

The car parks are managed under the wider PFI Facilities Management Agreement by Carillion Health. Carillion subcontract enforcement to PCP Enforcement Ltd

2. How many parking enforcement tickets were issued in your carparks between 1st April 2015 and 31st March 2016?

The Trust does not hold information on the activities of the enforcement sub-contractor

3. What is the cost of a parking enforcement fine in your carparks?

£60 if paid within 14 days, then £100.

4. How many parking enforcement ticket appeals did you receive between 1st April 2015 and 31st March 2016?

The Trust does not hold information on the activities of the enforcement sub-contractor

5. How many parking enforcement ticket appeals were successful between 1st April 2015 and 31st March 2016?

The Trust does not hold information on the activities of the enforcement sub-contractor


This post has been edited by emanresu: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 - 13:09
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
oasis786
post Tue, 9 Jan 2018 - 15:38
Post #64


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 6 Jan 2018
Member No.: 95,828



QUOTE (emanresu @ Tue, 9 Jan 2018 - 10:45) *
Suggest you get your head straight on this one, and see Carillion about the issue. A trip to the court is going to be very, very expensive. The judge can sidestep POFA and decide you were driving each and every time.


Anyone know if Carillion have a contact at the hospital?

Regarding sidestepping the PoFA, the judge can see any video footage and decide otherwise.

This post has been edited by oasis786: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 - 19:30
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
emanresu
post Tue, 9 Jan 2018 - 15:53
Post #65


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 11,094
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
From: Home alone
Member No.: 13,324



QUOTE
Anyone know if Carillion have a contact at the hospital?


You really should spend more time reading and checking than farting around complaining about an issue of your own making

http://www.porthosp.nhs.uk/about-us/polici...ty%20Policy.doc

Seems the CEO of the Trust could have banned the car but chose not to. That might help.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jlc
post Tue, 9 Jan 2018 - 15:57
Post #66


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41,503
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
From: Planet Earth
Member No.: 49,223



No need for side stepping if they have complied. Confirm this ASAP. (DVLA in process - also read here for summary of requirements)

There is probably not any video. Although, individual photo's will exist. (Or if they don't then there's angles - as they wouldn't be able to show the DVLA they had reasonable cause to request details)

This post has been edited by Jlc: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 - 15:58


--------------------
RK=Registered Keeper, OP=Original Poster (You!), CoFP=Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty, NtK=Notice to Keeper, NtD=Notice to Driver
PoFA=Protection of Freedoms Act, SAC=Safety Awareness Course, NIP=Notice of Intended Prosecution, ADR=Alternative Dispute Resolution
PPC=Private Parking Company, LBCCC=Letter Before County Court Claim, PII=Personally Identifiable Information, SAR=Subject Access Request

Private Parking - remember, they just want your money and will say almost anything to get it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
southpaw82
post Thu, 11 Jan 2018 - 23:41
Post #67


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 33,610
Joined: 2 Apr 2008
From: Not in the UK
Member No.: 18,483



QUOTE (emanresu @ Sun, 7 Jan 2018 - 08:13) *
The is a PFI site owned by Carillion

This Carillion?


--------------------
Moderator

Any comments made do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon. No lawyer/client relationship should be assumed nor should any duty of care be owed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ostell
post Fri, 12 Jan 2018 - 08:34
Post #68


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 17,088
Joined: 8 Mar 2013
Member No.: 60,457



That's the one
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
oasis786
post Fri, 12 Jan 2018 - 09:29
Post #69


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 6 Jan 2018
Member No.: 95,828



They've ripped off the public for years and they're still struggling.

Just an update. Emailed DVLA and also written to them to confirm when, by who, and why the driver details have been requested.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cabbyman
post Fri, 12 Jan 2018 - 14:57
Post #70


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 6,898
Joined: 15 Dec 2007
From: South of John O'Groats, north of Cape Town.
Member No.: 16,066



Bu99er! Water under the bridge now but there is definitely a Carillion office onsite who deal with complaints about food, housekeeping, etc. and, presumably, parking.

I was admitted via A&E at the weekend and there were notices everywhere with an onsite extension number.

EDIT: Website:

http://www.porthosp.nhs.uk/departments/fac...-management.htm

This post has been edited by cabbyman: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 - 14:59


--------------------
Cabbyman 11 PPCs 0
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
oasis786
post Tue, 16 Jan 2018 - 05:12
Post #71


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 6 Jan 2018
Member No.: 95,828



Still waiting on DVLA.. sent them a letter and also an email to their “foi” email but no response.

Prepared a letter with settlement offer, if DVLA confirms they have requested RK details for each individual PCN.

Now that Carillion have gone into liquidation, is the contract with the hospital PPC void therefore PCNs not valid? Just some wishful thinking!..

This post has been edited by oasis786: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 - 05:16
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
emanresu
post Tue, 16 Jan 2018 - 05:36
Post #72


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 11,094
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
From: Home alone
Member No.: 13,324



QUOTE
Now that Carillion have gone into liquidation, is the contract with the hospital PPC void therefore PCNs not valid? Just some wishful thinking!..


Carillion are gone and any contract is being run by the Official Receiver who can maintain or cancel any contract it wishes. Won't affect past tickets but will affect future ones.

QUOTE
Prepared a letter with settlement offer,


With them gone, any compromise/offer you might have been planning with Carillion is out the window but I don't think you were going to compromise.

IMHO you may be lucky with this one but it will depend on the wording of the letter of authority/contract that Carillion granted the PPC - which you won't see until a few days before the hearing. Squeaky bum time

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MFM
post Tue, 16 Jan 2018 - 08:42
Post #73


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 547
Joined: 5 Oct 2012
Member No.: 57,550



QUOTE (emanresu @ Tue, 16 Jan 2018 - 05:36) *
Carillion are gone and any contract is being run by the Official Receiver who can maintain or cancel any contract it wishes. Won't affect past tickets but will affect future ones.


Hopefully this will be lost in the unorganised mess that Carillion is(was). If they had countless people on the payroll who were no longer with the company you can only hope there's no way this will be further pursued.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
peterguk
post Tue, 16 Jan 2018 - 08:51
Post #74


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 13,735
Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Member No.: 14,720



QUOTE (MFM @ Tue, 16 Jan 2018 - 08:42) *
QUOTE (emanresu @ Tue, 16 Jan 2018 - 05:36) *
Carillion are gone and any contract is being run by the Official Receiver who can maintain or cancel any contract it wishes. Won't affect past tickets but will affect future ones.


Hopefully this will be lost in the unorganised mess that Carillion is(was). If they had countless people on the payroll who were no longer with the company you can only hope there's no way this will be further pursued.


The claimant is Parkshield Collection Ltd, presumably unrelated to Carillion. What is to stop them continuing the claim? Won't they just be recovering monies for the O.R. instead of Carillion?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
emanresu
post Tue, 16 Jan 2018 - 08:55
Post #75


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 11,094
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
From: Home alone
Member No.: 13,324



QUOTE
The claimant is Parkshield Collection Ltd, presumably unrelated to Carillion.


Yes to the Claimant but no to "unrelated" as Parkshield only derive their own standing via the authority granted to them by Carillion.

QUOTE
it will depend on the wording of the letter of authority/contract that Carillion granted the PPC - which you won't see until a few days before the hearing. Squeaky bum time
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
peterguk
post Tue, 16 Jan 2018 - 09:00
Post #76


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 13,735
Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Member No.: 14,720



QUOTE (emanresu @ Tue, 16 Jan 2018 - 08:55) *
QUOTE
The claimant is Parkshield Collection Ltd, presumably unrelated to Carillion.


Yes to the Claimant but no to "unrelated" as Parkshield only derive their own standing via the authority granted to them by Carillion.

QUOTE
it will depend on the wording of the letter of authority/contract that Carillion granted the PPC - which you won't see until a few days before the hearing. Squeaky bum time



OK. So any benefit/liability within the authority/contract doesn't automatically pass to the O.R.?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Churchmouse
post Tue, 16 Jan 2018 - 10:40
Post #77


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 2,356
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
From: Landan
Member No.: 20,731



QUOTE (peterguk @ Tue, 16 Jan 2018 - 08:51) *
QUOTE (MFM @ Tue, 16 Jan 2018 - 08:42) *
QUOTE (emanresu @ Tue, 16 Jan 2018 - 05:36) *
Carillion are gone and any contract is being run by the Official Receiver who can maintain or cancel any contract it wishes. Won't affect past tickets but will affect future ones.


Hopefully this will be lost in the unorganised mess that Carillion is(was). If they had countless people on the payroll who were no longer with the company you can only hope there's no way this will be further pursued.


The claimant is Parkshield Collection Ltd, presumably unrelated to Carillion. What is to stop them continuing the claim? Won't they just be recovering monies for the O.R. instead of Carillion?

If it is like most other PPCs, the Claimant was only ever "recovering monies" for itself, not to turn them over to Carillion.

--Churchmouse
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
oasis786
post Thu, 18 Jan 2018 - 12:25
Post #78


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 6 Jan 2018
Member No.: 95,828



I've received the info from DVLA.

In total they have sent 16 x V888/3 keeper request forms to DVLA. Two of these are not even at the local hospital and are at a hospital somewhere in Liverpool (Where I've never been) - So 14 in total at the alleged location.

Some of the copied request forms have "SD x 8" and "SD x 10" on. Not sure what this means, but can one V888/3 form be used to request details for multiple PCNs? Or do they need to submit one form per PCN?

This post has been edited by oasis786: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 - 12:33
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nosferatu1001
post Thu, 18 Jan 2018 - 12:41
Post #79


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 28,687
Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Member No.: 15,642



Theyre supposed to be using the electronic link, so the fact theyre not smells slightly
No idea what x8 and x10 menas, however they can only specify ONE date they want the details for, and EACH PARKING EVENT must be applied for seperately. Written into POFA, so law not something optional IF they want to hold the keeper liable.

16 (14) is less than 36, THEREFORE they cannot hold the keeper liable for the ones they DID NOT apply to the DVLA for. You should work that out as best you can, to work out how many they can *potentially* hold you liable for. You then work out if you were driving or not and when, as best you cna, giving as much info as possible to support your assertion.

Then go with a reduced offer, pointing out you are not the correct defendant in at least 20 cases, that they applied for your details UNLAWFULLY in at least 2, as your vehcile was never at the site claimed, and so on.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jlc
post Thu, 18 Jan 2018 - 13:14
Post #80


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41,503
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
From: Planet Earth
Member No.: 49,223



PoFA Schedule 4 11(1) (a) says 'the creditor (or a person acting for or on behalf of the creditor) has made an application for the keeper’s details in relation to the period of parking to which the unpaid parking charges relate'.

It doesn't have to be via electronic link but there has to be a request for each event (along with the date) to get the keeper at the date of event (KADOE). The DVLA also like their £2.50's.

The keeper could change at any point - which is why a request per date must be made.


--------------------
RK=Registered Keeper, OP=Original Poster (You!), CoFP=Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty, NtK=Notice to Keeper, NtD=Notice to Driver
PoFA=Protection of Freedoms Act, SAC=Safety Awareness Course, NIP=Notice of Intended Prosecution, ADR=Alternative Dispute Resolution
PPC=Private Parking Company, LBCCC=Letter Before County Court Claim, PII=Personally Identifiable Information, SAR=Subject Access Request

Private Parking - remember, they just want your money and will say almost anything to get it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 11:17
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here