PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Premier Park PCN
Bendo
post Sun, 15 Jul 2018 - 00:16
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: 17 Jan 2013
Member No.: 59,441



Hi all,

Just after a few quick pointers please, in the past couple of weeks I have had a PCN throught from Premier Park relating to a visit to Brixham Marina car park which uses ANPR but issues tickets that are easily mistaken for being Pay and Display if the driver isn't paying attention.

The PCN was received within a week of parking.
The PCN makes Premier Parks usual mistake of stating "if within 29 days" etc

More importantly the PCN states it was issued for the reason "Whole period of parking not paid for" This is not true and the printed ticket clearly shows that 4 hours were paid for (although the driver beleives that 5 hours worth of coins were fed into the machine) and the correct reg no is printed on the ticket. Unfortunately the missing 5th hour has resulted in a 25 minute overstay but the PCN only mentions whole period not paid for,

Any advice on the next course of action would be appreciated.

Thanks
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Start new topic
Replies (20 - 21)
Lynnzer
post Sat, 22 Jun 2019 - 08:47
Post #21


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 8,582
Joined: 9 Feb 2006
Member No.: 4,813



The fact that they back down so often, as do a lot of other companies, just goes to show that they use the court system merely as a weapon to intimidate.
Well done on sticking it to them.


--------------------
The Asda shopping trolley parking ticket enthusiast
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Advertisement
post Sat, 22 Jun 2019 - 08:47
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Bendo
post Sat, 22 Jun 2019 - 13:58
Post #22


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: 17 Jan 2013
Member No.: 59,441



QUOTE (Glacier2 @ Fri, 21 Jun 2019 - 21:28) *
So they issued a claim shortly after the POPLA verdict?

Yes, POPLA found for them basically ignoring some of my points and I couldn't be bother with complaining to POPLA so at that point I sent them an erasure request stating they had no legitimate interest in holding my PI but if they felt they did they should initiate proceedings. They elected to start a claim at that point but backed down just before they would have had to pay the hearing fee.

QUOTE (Lynnzer @ Sat, 22 Jun 2019 - 09:47) *
The fact that they back down so often, as do a lot of other companies, just goes to show that they use the court system merely as a weapon to intimidate.
Well done on sticking it to them.


Absolutely, wasn't POFA supposed to reduce the burden on the court system with these pointless claims? Perhaps parliament should be looking at it again and barring companies from making claims when they drop a certain percentage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 11:09
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here