PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
POPLA Appeal Success V's Parking Eye, Success as Hirer
Mr.Brown058
post Thu, 10 Aug 2017 - 14:58
Post #1


Member
Group Icon

Group: Bad Boyz & Girlz
Posts: 57
Joined: 7 Mar 2016
Member No.: 82,829



POPLA Appeal Successful

Summary of your case
The appellant’s case is that they are appealing as the hirer of the vehicle, and that the operator has not complied with Schedule 4 of the
Protection of Freedoms Act (PoFA) 2012.
The appellant has advised that the operator can pursue the driver of the vehicle but they are not under a legal obligation to identify them.

As the operator has not demonstrated that it has complied with section 13 and section 14 of PoFA 2012,
I cannot conclude that the Parking Charge Notice was issued correctly.

This post has been edited by Mr.Brown058: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 - 14:59
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Friday, 23rd February 2018 - 02:27
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.