PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Speeding/Criminal Case Success Stories!
firefly
post Fri, 20 Aug 2004 - 23:28
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,714
Joined: 3 Sep 2003
From: ex-Scotland
Member No.: 298



I am trying to build a library of all the PePiPoo cases that have had happy endings, be it written confirmation or timed out.

Can all users post the link to their (or any other cases they know about) threads so a database can be made up. Once I have a list I will edit this post and update it as and when required.

Not that we get them that often, but when the trolls appear on the site and start having a go, it would be nice to point them in the direction of people who have "had a go" and came out unscathed.

Cheers.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
31 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > »   
Start new topic
Replies (80 - 99)
Advertisement
post Fri, 20 Aug 2004 - 23:28
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
jeffreyarcher
post Sun, 17 Apr 2005 - 09:08
Post #81


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 8,639
Joined: 5 Jul 2003
Member No.: 134



P3P1P00; another sub-section (4). Didn't get to summons.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jeffreyarcher
post Thu, 21 Apr 2005 - 01:25
Post #82


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 8,639
Joined: 5 Jul 2003
Member No.: 134



Spearchucker; another sub-section (4).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
firefly
post Wed, 27 Apr 2005 - 10:25
Post #83


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,714
Joined: 3 Sep 2003
From: ex-Scotland
Member No.: 298



lescargot.  PACE statement, fixed penalty received - ignored - and now timed out.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mika
post Thu, 28 Apr 2005 - 14:05
Post #84


Member
Group Icon

Group: Administrators
Posts: 9,760
Joined: 30 Mar 2003
From: Wiltshire, UK
Member No.: 4



Hi all,

We received the following e-mail, from someone who would like to remain anonymous, today:

“Hi Mika

I thought I'd email this for your consideration to place under successes (prefer that you didn't use my name):

- Date of offence: 30 Aug 2004
- Location: Bournemouth
- Alleged: 60 in a 50
- NIP: 10 Sep (old style: says 'if none of the above cover your situation, then write to us', so I did)
- PACE letter 7th Oct
- 2nd NIP: 19th Oct
- no more correspondence
- called the mag court in Poole for the 2nd time today: no papers laid.


Pepipoo has been a great help to me. I will donate my fine to Pepipoo.

My sincere thanks to you and 'poo.

Kind regards,”


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jeffreyarcher
post Fri, 29 Apr 2005 - 01:20
Post #85


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 8,639
Joined: 5 Jul 2003
Member No.: 134



Monoi and his wife, 2 X speeding & S172; another sub-section (4) (only viewable by members, but the background is here and here).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chile
post Fri, 13 May 2005 - 20:32
Post #86


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 28
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
From: Suffolk
Member No.: 2,570



I am pleased to say that I had my case dropped by the CPS 2 days before going to court.

After help from Pepipoo, I challenged the legality of the S172 here and walked away unscathed!

Cheers folks! occasion16.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mikey748
post Mon, 16 May 2005 - 18:16
Post #87


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 2 Dec 2004
Member No.: 1,974



Norfolk defective s172 success

[forum link]

Thanks everyone! laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Insider
post Wed, 18 May 2005 - 00:36
Post #88


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 3,410
Joined: 14 Nov 2004
From: Inside somewhere ;-)
Member No.: 1,871



ColinG

Magistrates decline prosecution application to ajourn due to lack of officer (again).  Upon this decision, the prosecution offered no evidence and the case is dismissed.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
firefly
post Thu, 19 May 2005 - 16:27
Post #89


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,714
Joined: 3 Sep 2003
From: ex-Scotland
Member No.: 298



GarethVDavies.  Prosecution lost his bundle, and were unable to present a case in court.  :roll:


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jeffreyarcher
post Fri, 20 May 2005 - 02:57
Post #90


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 8,639
Joined: 5 Jul 2003
Member No.: 134



Philwalker_WBA. The street lamps on a purported restricted road, without repeaters, were only footway lamps.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
firefly
post Mon, 23 May 2005 - 06:23
Post #91


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,714
Joined: 3 Sep 2003
From: ex-Scotland
Member No.: 298



YELLOW.  Subsection 4.  Got to court, but justice was satisfied 'reasonable diligence' had been displayed.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Insider
post Fri, 27 May 2005 - 10:15
Post #92


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 3,410
Joined: 14 Nov 2004
From: Inside somewhere ;-)
Member No.: 1,871



Muffys Case (Para. 4 Defence) Got to court, CPS dropped it before the hearing due to a lack of evidence to proceed


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
andy_foster
post Tue, 31 May 2005 - 13:45
Post #93


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 24,214
Joined: 9 Sep 2004
From: Reading
Member No.: 1,624



TVP unsigned s.172 response. The case was dropped, so I still have a Belgian licence, but I feel the result was more of a success for the CPS and scammers than it was for me.


--------------------
Andy

Some people think that I make them feel stupid. To be fair, they deserve most of the credit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
firefly
post Wed, 1 Jun 2005 - 16:15
Post #94


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,714
Joined: 3 Sep 2003
From: ex-Scotland
Member No.: 298



Fudge&Fury.  PACE statement submitted.  One B&B letter, then nothing.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jeffreyarcher
post Wed, 1 Jun 2005 - 23:11
Post #95


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 8,639
Joined: 5 Jul 2003
Member No.: 134



PM70; road works temporary limit. The wrong traffic order was cited on the summons. There was also no evidence that the terminal signs were in place at the time.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Divbad
post Mon, 6 Jun 2005 - 12:43
Post #96


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 976
Joined: 11 Dec 2003
From: Manchester
Member No.: 646



Divbad s172 charge, deeply dodgy paperwork and missing exhibit.

Claimed £550 costs, waiting to see what I get.

Viewable by members only, but it pays to check the paperwork very carefully & talk to cjm99 if you ever get a summons!


--------------------
It is probable that, simply, in addition, in my opinion, as accurately as I want to make it, probably, I am an orang utang. But that's not what the eye sees.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jeffreyarcher
post Wed, 8 Jun 2005 - 01:23
Post #97


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 8,639
Joined: 5 Jul 2003
Member No.: 134



Sami1; PACE statement sent. Also the first NIP in the chain appeared to be out of time. Case dropped two days before trial 'due to lack of evidence'.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
firefly
post Sat, 11 Jun 2005 - 21:12
Post #98


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,714
Joined: 3 Sep 2003
From: ex-Scotland
Member No.: 298



Speedy Gonzales.  Ignored NIP, no follow up from scammers.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jeffreyarcher
post Fri, 24 Jun 2005 - 01:31
Post #99


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 8,639
Joined: 5 Jul 2003
Member No.: 134



david2428; a couple of weeks since we've had a success reported, however, it was worth the wait.
Upper Thames St. SPECS, Evening Standard story.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
anton
post Sat, 25 Jun 2005 - 11:39
Post #100


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 1,751
Joined: 12 Aug 2004
From: hampshire
Member No.: 1,514



a quick tot up makes that 124 cases
plus the big cock-ups

such as :


Thames St- signs in wrong pace a mega 5500 cases!

Dorset faulty C.O.F.P   thousands of cases 1991 to 2005 in dorset

Norfolk-faulty N.I.P. could affect thousands

Folly Bottom. Hundreds will get refunds- although the scamera are squerming a bit.

I know PePiPoo can't claim all these cases but the camera partnerships are taking a bit of a hammering lately  :lol:


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

31 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Friday, 29th March 2024 - 05:19
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here