PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

UK CPM: PCN to keeper for Unauthorised Parking, Confusing signage along roadways but no signage near parking bays
vw.andi
post Fri, 17 May 2019 - 15:19
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 7 Oct 2008
Member No.: 23,073



Hi all,
Looking for a help and some advice from you, guys.
The keeper received PCN by post from UK PCM for Unauthorised Parking. The keeper wasn't driving the vehicle
at the alleged time. The incident's place is near the demolished former Imperial House site in Alma Road
(now under redevelopment to Windsor Business Quarter).
This road is the only way to the free car park at the end of that road. There are few parking spaces on the right
side and the fence around the demolished former Imperial House on the opposite. There are old double yellow lines
everywhere along the road with only exception of these few unmarked parking bays. No any signs attached near these bays.
But there are lot of different signs all over the fence across the road and one more attached to the lamppost before
the road bends. The whole place is looking abandoned with rubbish dumped everywhere and the signage there extremely
confusing and contradicting.
I will try to upload some pictures and I will greatly appreciate for any advice regarding my problem.

[attachment=64118:20190512_140108b.jpg]
[attachment=64114:001.png]
[attachment=64115:Scan01.jpg]
[attachment=64116:Scan02.jpg]
[attachment=64117:Map01.png]

This post has been edited by vw.andi: Mon, 20 May 2019 - 11:37
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 19)
Advertisement
post Fri, 17 May 2019 - 15:19
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
ostell
post Fri, 17 May 2019 - 15:21
Post #2


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 17,088
Joined: 8 Mar 2013
Member No.: 60,457



So the PCN, redacted by leave the dates, and the signs around where the car was allegedly parked.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vw.andi
post Fri, 17 May 2019 - 16:12
Post #3


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 7 Oct 2008
Member No.: 23,073



QUOTE (ostell @ Fri, 17 May 2019 - 16:21) *
So the PCN, redacted by leave the dates, and the signs around where the car was allegedly parked.

Thanks.
Added some pictures...

http://i66.tinypic.com/11ae2hf.png
http://i63.tinypic.com/2129w13.png
http://i64.tinypic.com/200xn4x.jpg
http://i68.tinypic.com/2vkhi6a.jpg
http://i68.tinypic.com/98u93s.jpg
http://i66.tinypic.com/x6acli.jpg
http://i63.tinypic.com/2wclmyo.jpg


This post has been edited by vw.andi: Sun, 19 May 2019 - 14:44
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Redivi
post Fri, 17 May 2019 - 16:23
Post #4


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,126
Joined: 31 Jan 2018
Member No.: 96,238



You don't upload pictures at all

You host them somewhere like tinypic and post the link
See the FAQ on this site for instructions
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vw.andi
post Fri, 17 May 2019 - 16:55
Post #5


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 7 Oct 2008
Member No.: 23,073



QUOTE (Redivi @ Fri, 17 May 2019 - 17:23) *
You don't upload pictures at all

You host them somewhere like tinypic and post the link
See the FAQ on this site for instructions


http://i68.tinypic.com/2mn2id2.png
http://i65.tinypic.com/2vwu653.jpg
http://i66.tinypic.com/2429bsw.jpg
http://i67.tinypic.com/1zdq4b8.jpg
http://i65.tinypic.com/32zhs28.jpg

This post has been edited by vw.andi: Sun, 19 May 2019 - 14:48
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ostell
post Fri, 17 May 2019 - 21:07
Post #6


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 17,088
Joined: 8 Mar 2013
Member No.: 60,457



So all the signs look as though they are forbidding, they are not making an offer of a contract to park and to then claim that a contract was offered for doing something that was forbidden is perverse.

Here's some text I saved about a similar scenario, though this time "permits only"

The signage in the car park is of a “forbidding” nature. It is limited to cars displaying a valid permit only and therefore the terms cannot apply to cars without a permit because the signage does not offer an invitation to park on certain terms. The terms are forbidding. This means that there was never a contractual relationship. I refer you to the following case law: PCM-UK v Bull et all B4GF26K6 [2016], UKPC v Masterson B4GF26K6[2016], Horizon Parking v Mr J C5GF17X2 [2016] – In all three of these cases the signage was found to be forbidding and thus only a trespass had occurred and would be a matter for the landowner.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vw.andi
post Fri, 17 May 2019 - 22:47
Post #7


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 7 Oct 2008
Member No.: 23,073



These signs are very confusing and unclear:

While the one signage says:

NO PARKING AT ANYTIME

the other one displays:

NO PARKING ON ROADWAYS AT ANYTIME

YOU MUST PARK WHOLLY WITHIN A MARKED BAY.
NO PARKING ON ROADWAYS / YELLOW LINES / PAVED /
HATCHED OR LANDSCAPED AREAS

There are no any signage near the parking bays. Moreover these bays not even properly marked.

Looks like the signage is forbidding any parking on the yellow lines and roadways but allowing
to park on the parking bays as long as the car was parked wholly within these bays.

The driver at the time had suggested that as there wasn't any signage along the parking bays,
it's ok to park there as long as it's parked within these bays.

This post has been edited by vw.andi: Sat, 18 May 2019 - 04:20
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vw.andi
post Sun, 19 May 2019 - 00:52
Post #8


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 7 Oct 2008
Member No.: 23,073



QUOTE (ostell @ Fri, 17 May 2019 - 22:07) *
So all the signs look as though they are forbidding, they are not making an offer of a contract to park and to then claim that a contract was offered for doing something that was forbidden is perverse.

Here's some text I saved about a similar scenario, though this time "permits only"

The signage in the car park is of a “forbidding” nature. It is limited to cars displaying a valid permit only and therefore the terms cannot apply to cars without a permit because the signage does not offer an invitation to park on certain terms. The terms are forbidding. This means that there was never a contractual relationship. I refer you to the following case law: PCM-UK v Bull et all B4GF26K6 [2016], UKPC v Masterson B4GF26K6[2016], Horizon Parking v Mr J C5GF17X2 [2016] – In all three of these cases the signage was found to be forbidding and thus only a trespass had occurred and would be a matter for the landowner.

Thank you, ostell

I had a look at the quoted law cases and found them quite different to my problem.
1. No any signage within the parking bays
2. All signage placed on the site all over the fences and lampposts placed above the double yellow lines,
suggesting they only related to the double yellow lines.
3. Two different wording on signages from UK CPM, but they included only one signage in their evidence
but didn't mention the other one, that allows to park within the bays.

Please help me to decide: is my case worth trying to defend or I will be better off to pay this cowboys £60 within next 2 days.
If I got a strong grounds for fightback what should I do in my next step? Appeal to the UK CPM and then to IPS? Or should I ignore
these letters? Or should I try to find out who is the landowner and address my complaint to them?
Please advice.

This post has been edited by vw.andi: Sun, 19 May 2019 - 00:57
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vw.andi
post Mon, 20 May 2019 - 10:12
Post #9


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 7 Oct 2008
Member No.: 23,073



Please, guys, help me to understand that.

One of the signs which UKPCM has not included in their evidence pack seems like it's not forbidding parking:
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?act=at...st&id=64118

But the other one is clearly forbidding parking at anytime:
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?act=at...st&id=64114

Can I appeal on the ground that the different signs were of conflicting nature,
written in inconsistent and ambiguous terms and therefore are mutually exclusive and misleading?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ostell
post Mon, 20 May 2019 - 12:47
Post #10


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 17,088
Joined: 8 Mar 2013
Member No.: 60,457



Yes, and as a consuminer you are entitled to use the one more advantageous to you.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vw.andi
post Mon, 20 May 2019 - 16:19
Post #11


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 7 Oct 2008
Member No.: 23,073



QUOTE (ostell @ Mon, 20 May 2019 - 13:47) *
Yes, and as a consuminer you are entitled to use the one more advantageous to you.

Doubt that the alleged driver may be classified as the consumer... in this case
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ostell
post Tue, 21 May 2019 - 07:53
Post #12


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 17,088
Joined: 8 Mar 2013
Member No.: 60,457



He's not, as far as I am aware, a business.

What sign was included with the PCN

This post has been edited by ostell: Tue, 21 May 2019 - 07:54
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vw.andi
post Tue, 21 May 2019 - 11:46
Post #13


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 7 Oct 2008
Member No.: 23,073



QUOTE (ostell @ Tue, 21 May 2019 - 08:53) *
He's not, as far as I am aware, a business.

What sign was included with the PCN

http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?act=at...st&id=64114
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ostell
post Tue, 21 May 2019 - 19:35
Post #14


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 17,088
Joined: 8 Mar 2013
Member No.: 60,457



So that's what they sent you so go with that. Forbidding sign and therefore no contract with the driver
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vw.andi
post Thu, 6 Jun 2019 - 13:44
Post #15


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 7 Oct 2008
Member No.: 23,073



I tried my luck by complaining to the landowners but was reverted back to the scammers.
I'm thinking of complaining to the MP but don't really know how to do it.

Today I received an email with appeal rejection letter from UKPCM:
http://i67.tinypic.com/2jdqljo.jpg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lynnzer
post Fri, 7 Jun 2019 - 10:27
Post #16


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 8,582
Joined: 9 Feb 2006
Member No.: 4,813



I'm just wondering. Is Alma Road part of the local council's designated highway?
It won't be the 1st time a parking company has ticketed on public land.
You mention double yellows on part of the road so I have a suspicion it isn't privately owned.
Call the local highways dept and ask them


--------------------
The Asda shopping trolley parking ticket enthusiast
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ostell
post Fri, 7 Jun 2019 - 11:31
Post #17


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 17,088
Joined: 8 Mar 2013
Member No.: 60,457



I couldn't find the PCN within all those photos, was it there ?

Has the driver been identified? Yes or no
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vw.andi
post Fri, 7 Jun 2019 - 14:16
Post #18


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 7 Oct 2008
Member No.: 23,073



QUOTE (ostell @ Fri, 7 Jun 2019 - 12:31) *
I couldn't find the PCN within all those photos, was it there ?

Has the driver been identified? Yes or no


Please find photos of the PCN in Post #1.

Driver has not been identified.
The driver was the other person, definitely not the keeper.

QUOTE (Lynnzer @ Fri, 7 Jun 2019 - 11:27) *
I'm just wondering. Is Alma Road part of the local council's designated highway?
It won't be the 1st time a parking company has ticketed on public land.
You mention double yellows on part of the road so I have a suspicion it isn't privately owned.
Call the local highways dept and ask them


Double yellow lines appeared to be hand-painted:

http://i64.tinypic.com/2ryr1v8.jpg
http://i64.tinypic.com/343szlu.jpg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vw.andi
post Mon, 12 Aug 2019 - 22:44
Post #19


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 7 Oct 2008
Member No.: 23,073



Finally got PCN cancelled by Landowner.

Their manager sent me this email:

"Dear Mr

Many thanks for your email. I have reviewed the matter and can confirm you will shortly be contacted by UK Car Park Management to rescind your car parking fine.

Whilst the site should be strictly no parking there was a sign that created uncertainty. This sign has been immediately removed.

It should now be clear that no parking is permitted at any point and this is to ensure clear access at all times to third party land.

I apologise for your inconvenience and for any stress that may have been caused by this matter.

Yours sincerely,"


So, the matter is closed now.

Many thanks
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ostell
post Tue, 13 Aug 2019 - 08:00
Post #20


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 17,088
Joined: 8 Mar 2013
Member No.: 60,457



Well done. Wonder what the wording will be on the new sign
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 21:35
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here