Traffic adjudicators , Split from original thread |
Traffic adjudicators , Split from original thread |
Sun, 4 Feb 2018 - 15:50
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 353 Joined: 19 Dec 2017 Member No.: 95,634 |
Guys please I would really appreciate some specific replies That coming immediately after #29 and #30 I'm so glad I didn't reply in the early hours when I read it. If you don't understand points made or what you might glean from previous Tribunal cases then ask questions. I suggest otherwise. 4101 is probably right the council will not cancel, but adjudicators like to see consistence so your reps should cover all points you intend to appeal on, even if only briefly +1 and he's not right: See post #24. The only exception I've found so far is hugely in OP's favour. and there are further implications (Mick?) where they routinely issue the two and almost always only contest one. No, it must be only reject one because I'm not seeing DNCs in Register. So what not write the reps. for him? You have all the answers to assure acceptance it seems. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Friday, 29th March 2024 - 01:20 |