PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Traffic adjudicators , Split from original thread
4101
post Sun, 4 Feb 2018 - 15:50
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 353
Joined: 19 Dec 2017
Member No.: 95,634



QUOTE (Neil B @ Sun, 4 Feb 2018 - 13:38) *
QUOTE (Optima_5123 @ Sun, 4 Feb 2018 - 01:12) *
Guys please I would really appreciate some specific replies

That coming immediately after #29 and #30 I'm so glad I didn't reply in the early
hours when I read it.

If you don't understand points made or what you might glean from previous Tribunal cases
then ask questions.

QUOTE (PASTMYBEST @ Sun, 4 Feb 2018 - 11:16) *
I suggest otherwise. 4101 is probably right the council will not cancel, but adjudicators like to see consistence so your reps should cover all points you intend to appeal on, even if only briefly

+1 and he's not right: See post #24.

The only exception I've found so far is hugely in OP's favour.

and there are further implications (Mick?) where they routinely issue the two and almost always only contest
one.
No, it must be only reject one because I'm not seeing DNCs in Register.



So what not write the reps. for him? You have all the answers to assure acceptance it seems.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Friday, 29th March 2024 - 01:20
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here