PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
post Fri, 2 Nov 2012 - 08:32
Post #1

Group Icon

Group: Root Admin
Posts: 8,178
Joined: 30 Mar 2003
From: Wokingham, UK
Member No.: 2

PCN (front and back) October 2012


Pepipoo relies on you
to keep this site running!
Donate to Pepipoo now using your
Visa, Mastercard, debit card or PayPal account
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 2)
post Fri, 2 Nov 2012 - 08:32
Post #

Advertise here!

Go to the top of the page
Quote Post
post Sun, 15 Dec 2013 - 10:43
Post #2


Group: Members
Posts: 4,167
Joined: 6 Oct 2012
Member No.: 57,558

No mention of POPLA, £20 would make it more difficult to argue against but they then spoil it by increasing it to £60. Wonder who the third party is they have to use to get the DVLA to release RK details, the NTK will reveal more.

This post has been edited by kommando: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 - 10:49
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Fri, 12 Feb 2016 - 10:04
Post #3


Group: Members
Posts: 3,539
Joined: 17 Mar 2013
Member No.: 60,602

TBH I would just pay the £20 unless you feel there was something particularly unjust about the circumstances in which it was issued.

The DVLA make a special case for hospitals & allow them to operate parking regimes with access to keeper details without membership of an ATA or access to a second level independent appeals service. This is contrary to the DVLA's stated policy but as they are a law into themselves there is little that can be done. TBH Hospitals are a special case with large public car parks that are not subject to statutory control which would be a more satisfactory solution than the current mish mash.

This post has been edited by nigelbb: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 - 10:05

British Parking Association Ltd Code of Practice(Appendix C contains Schedule 4 of POFA 2012 ) & can be found here
DfT Guidance on Section 56 and Schedule 4 of POFA 2012
Damning OFT advice on levels of parking charges that was ignored by the BPA Ltd Reference Request Number: IAT/FOIA/135010 – 12 October 2012
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:



Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Wednesday, 30th September 2020 - 07:19
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.