PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

[NIP Wizard] NIP Received - what should I do?
Innocent?
post Thu, 27 Aug 2009 - 17:54
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Member No.: 31,551



NIP Details and Circumstances
What is the name of the Constabulary? -
Date of the offence: - August 2009
Date of the NIP: - 3 days after the offence
Date you received the NIP: - 4 days after the offence
Location of offence (exact location as it appears on the NIP: important): - A56 Washway Road, south of Oakfield Road,, Sale
Was the NIP addressed to you? - Yes
Was the NIP sent by first class post, second class or recorded delivery? - First
If your are not the Registered Keeper, what is your relationship to the vehicle? -
How many current points do you have? - 0
Provide a description of events (if you know what happened) telling us as much about the incident as possible - some things that may seem trivial to you may be important, so don't leave anything out. Please do not post personal details for obvious reasons - Not aware of having been caught speeding. There is a camera in the area (Gatso) which I am aware of and am careful of so would be surprised if it was this. Before doing anything I am interested to know what evidence there is/how it was obtained. Should I request the photographic (or other) evidence by email and what should I say on the request? The leaflet with the NIP says I have a right to see it.

NIP says 40mph in a 30mph zone. What is the penalty likely to be and am I likely to get the awareness course option?


NIP Wizard Responses
These were the responses used by the Wizard to arrive at its recommendation:
Have you received a NIP? - Yes
Are you the Registered Keeper of the vehicle concerned (is your name and address on the V5/V5C)? - Yes
Did the first NIP arrive within 14 days? - Yes
Although you are the Registered Keeper, were you also the keeper of the vehicle concerned (the person normally responsible for it) at the time of the alleged offence? - Yes
Were you driving? - Yes
Which country did the alleged offence take place in? - England

NIP Wizard Recommendation
Based on these responses the Wizard suggested that this course of action should be considered:
  • The law requires you to provide the information requested in the Section 172 notice within the 28 day period, naming yourself as the driver. If you are considering obtaining formal legal advice, do so before returning the notice.

    You should note that there is nothing to be gained by responding any earlier than you have to at any stage of the process. You are likely to receive a Conditional Offer of a Fixed Penalty (COFP) and further reminder(s). If you want to continue the fight, you should ignore all correspondence from the police until you receive a summons. You need to understand from the outset that while you will receive much help and support from members on the forums, you will need to put time and effort into fighting your case and ultimately be prepared to stand up in court to defend yourself.

Generated by the PePiPoo NIP Wizard v3.3.2: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:54:31 +0100

This post has been edited by Innocent?: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 - 17:56
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 19)
Advertisement
post Thu, 27 Aug 2009 - 17:54
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Pete D
post Thu, 27 Aug 2009 - 18:11
Post #2


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,748
Joined: 4 Apr 2007
Member No.: 11,456



You could write to them and ask for any photo's to help you identify the driver at the time. Do not elaborate or use the words evidence or proof. The do not have to send them but often do. This does not stop the 28 day clock so do it now and keep it simple. A SAC is most probably not an option as it cuts off at 39 mph. 3 points and £60 applies here. I fit was not a fixed camera then the image you should recive will identify where and how you were clocked and the quality of the ping. No not return the NIP/S172 yet. Pete D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Innocent?
post Thu, 27 Aug 2009 - 18:15
Post #3


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Member No.: 31,551



Thanks. That's what I was thinking of doing. Just emailing and saying I would be grateful if you would provide me with the photograph or video in relation to this case.

39mph is the cut off - bu**er!!

I guess my only hope if it is not a Gatso is to ask for the calibration certificate etc though if it's 3 points and a fine on a clean licence it might not be worth the hassle. I'll see what the photo shows then look into it further from there.

Cheers.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pete D
post Thu, 27 Aug 2009 - 18:25
Post #4


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,748
Joined: 4 Apr 2007
Member No.: 11,456



Do not ask for the Cal cert yet as it may effect whether they send you a photo. These items are regarded as evidence and are not usually available until you plead not guilty to a summons. Pete D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PRg
post Fri, 28 Aug 2009 - 01:08
Post #5


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 760
Joined: 9 Apr 2009
From: The Moon
Member No.: 27,699



Im suprised you got done there, I worked on that road doing a driveway for a few weeks and seen plenty of people floor it through the camera with no flash, I always thought it was an empty one.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Innocent?
post Sat, 29 Aug 2009 - 22:33
Post #6


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Member No.: 31,551



I got the photos through today - both of them. It appears the car was overtaking a bike so I guess it must have been a choice between slowing right down for the bike or speeding up a bit to go around it and whoever was driving made the wrong decision. Reg number is barely legible on photos but I guess the originals must have been better. It was a gatso. Is there any point in trying to do anything about this?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pete D
post Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 09:46
Post #7


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,748
Joined: 4 Apr 2007
Member No.: 11,456



Does the distance travelled across the markers support the detected speed. If you are unsure then wash off the personal ID and post them in your thread for others to work out what speed you may have doing. The instructions are in the FAQ section. Pete D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Innocent?
post Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 13:26
Post #8


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Member No.: 31,551



Thanks. I've attempted the calculation but the gaps must be less than 5 feet so I guess I will have to go and measure them. I wouldn't think there will be doubt as to whether speeding or not but it might be worth checking as according to the info on here GMP have a limit of 39mph for speed awareness. That being the case, if it turns out to be slightly inaccurate and therefore less than 40mph, might this help in securing a speed awareness course? If this is the case I will go and measure the gaps and then might need advice on how to approach it in terms of wording a letter.

Thanks again
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pete D
post Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 13:39
Post #9


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,748
Joined: 4 Apr 2007
Member No.: 11,456



The markers for Gatso's are 5ft or 6m Redspeed camera markings are 1m. Post them up and we'll help. Pete D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Innocent?
post Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 13:53
Post #10


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Member No.: 31,551



It says Gatsometer on the photo but if they are 5 ft then the speed would be 75mph!

I'll scan them and take off the personal info.

Cheers
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BaggieBoy
post Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 13:53
Post #11


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 6,373
Joined: 3 Apr 2006
From: North Hampshire
Member No.: 5,183



QUOTE (Pete D @ Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 14:39) *
The markers for Gatso's are 5ft or 6m Redspeed camera markings are 1m. Post them up and we'll help. Pete D

Typo I suspect, should be 2m.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pete D
post Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 13:55
Post #12


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,748
Joined: 4 Apr 2007
Member No.: 11,456



Have you accounted for the timing between the flashes. It is on the photo. Pete D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Innocent?
post Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 13:59
Post #13


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Member No.: 31,551



Bottom of info part of picture 2 says 0.5 sec 049.

If I try recalculating with 1m instead of 5 ft the speed is still 49 mph

Is there any harm in posting pics on here?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BaggieBoy
post Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 14:02
Post #14


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 6,373
Joined: 3 Apr 2006
From: North Hampshire
Member No.: 5,183



As long as you remove any identifying information, it's not a problem.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pete D
post Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 14:05
Post #15


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,748
Joined: 4 Apr 2007
Member No.: 11,456



Yes Typo 2mm not 6m.

7 marks * 5 feet * 0.6818 / 0.5 seconds = 47.7 mph

Pete D

This post has been edited by Pete D: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 14:10
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Innocent?
post Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 14:05
Post #16


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Member No.: 31,551



Just looking at the number of lines the car covers and it can't be 5 feet between small marks. (just editing pic)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Innocent?
post Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 14:23
Post #17


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Member No.: 31,551






I make it 11 marks by lining up those in the other lane with a straight edge

This post has been edited by Innocent?: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 14:24
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pete D
post Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 14:54
Post #18


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,748
Joined: 4 Apr 2007
Member No.: 11,456



Yep it looks like 63 but I reckon 9.25 markers but you have edit the far markers out. Assuming not a faulty camera/flash timing then the only other reason for the difference between the radar detected speed and what appears from the marking is that you were accelerating and that must have been quite hard to gain 14mph from the point of detection. Can you explain your postion on the road, had you overtaken another vehicle prior to the gatso. Other that Redspeed spacing I have not seen markers less that 5 ft. You could go and measure them if they are local to you. Normally to question the detected speed you have to prove from the markers that there is an error substantially greater that 10%. You can do that, but in the wrong direction that may not be wise to disclose. What do others think. Pete D

This post has been edited by Pete D: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 14:54
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Innocent?
post Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 15:01
Post #19


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Member No.: 31,551



I measured from the rear of the car as it's much easier to line up with the lines by using a straight edge across to the other lane. I counted those behind the car on each one using the point the back of the rear tyres touch the road. There are 7 and a bit on the first picture and 18 and a bit on the second - therefore 11 covered.

I do have some other details but would rather pm these.

It's only half a mile away so I could go and measure them later.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Innocent?
post Sun, 30 Aug 2009 - 15:22
Post #20


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Member No.: 31,551



I just tried to work out the gap using the wheelbase (centre of tyre contact patch to centre of tyre contact patch) of the car which is 2.615 m and though hard to be exact it works out a lot closer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Friday, 6th December 2019 - 23:41
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.