PCN for wheels on faded double yellow |
PCN for wheels on faded double yellow |
Sun, 24 Jun 2018 - 10:56
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 49 Joined: 24 Jun 2018 Member No.: 98,585 |
Hi,
So i got this PCN for parking at the end of a road full of cars and my back wheels happen to be on double yellows. I was late for work and genuinely didnt realise my wheels were touching them. I went back to photograph the lines and i have attached those, they are faded and my wheels are exactly on the faded parts, so i was going to use this initially as the basis for my appeal. (would i even get far with that?) I am still within the first 14 days and have not made an informal appeal which i was going to do online. I have no access to any information on their website such as photos they took etc. I dont know whether to ask for those first or go straight in with the faded lines? I have attached the PCN for possible errors? Many thanks for any help |
|
|
Advertisement |
Sun, 24 Jun 2018 - 10:56
Post
#
|
Advertise here! |
|
|
|
Sun, 28 Oct 2018 - 14:49
Post
#81
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 35,064 Joined: 2 Aug 2008 From: Woking Member No.: 21,551 |
You miss the point: the NOR did not include the out of time information, so the owner wouldn't know.
Edit My suggestion therefore uses this omission to bolster the will/may argument rather than use it as a strand on its own. This post has been edited by hcandersen: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 - 16:12 |
|
|
Sun, 28 Oct 2018 - 17:53
Post
#82
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 38,006 Joined: 3 Dec 2010 Member No.: 42,618 |
You miss the point: the NOR did not include the out of time information, so the owner wouldn't know. Edit My suggestion therefore uses this omission to bolster the will/may argument rather than use it as a strand on its own. And I still think that, no matter how you frame it, it will detract from the argument that is being made. We're just going to have to agree to disagree on this one, but IMO will/may should comfortably win on its own. -------------------- If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
|
|
|
Sun, 28 Oct 2018 - 20:42
Post
#83
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 49 Joined: 24 Jun 2018 Member No.: 98,585 |
Thankyou all for your input. Submitted now, will update with the decision
|
|
|
Wed, 31 Oct 2018 - 19:04
Post
#84
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 49 Joined: 24 Jun 2018 Member No.: 98,585 |
Decision below,
I'm actually shocked, I dont know if he has read the full document, He says that I simply said' see evidence' thats because it reached the word limit and i had to upload a wordDoc, so im not sure if he only saw the paragraph i managed to fit in the box! This post has been edited by freddy234: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 - 19:05 |
|
|
Wed, 31 Oct 2018 - 19:39
Post
#85
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 26,655 Joined: 6 Nov 2014 Member No.: 74,048 |
A couple of things stink. TPT do not offer a personal hearing it must be requested and is then at the behest of an adjudicator. But that is not the reason for the alleged breach. but that's it unless you want to fork out thousands for a JR
-------------------- All advice is given freely. It is given without guarantee and responsibility for its use rests with the user
|
|
|
Wed, 31 Oct 2018 - 22:34
Post
#86
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 38,006 Joined: 3 Dec 2010 Member No.: 42,618 |
I would apply for a further review, saying the reviewing adjudicator did not see the ground of appeal document. I would hint that this might be due to a technical error on the TPT website. I would follow it up with a phone call to the LT to confirm the word doc has gone through correctly.
-------------------- If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
|
|
|
Mon, 12 Nov 2018 - 19:02
Post
#87
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 49 Joined: 24 Jun 2018 Member No.: 98,585 |
So Just to update, adjudicator didnt read the whole document as apparently it was not 'uploaded'. I sent the doc by email, he had a look and decided he wasn't changing his mind on the decision. Nevertheless, thank you all for the support along the past few months.
Till next time! |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Friday, 29th March 2024 - 11:08 |