PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

PCN for wheels on faded double yellow
freddy234
post Sun, 24 Jun 2018 - 10:56
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 49
Joined: 24 Jun 2018
Member No.: 98,585



Hi,

So i got this PCN for parking at the end of a road full of cars and my back wheels happen to be on double yellows. I was late for work and genuinely didnt realise my wheels were touching them.

I went back to photograph the lines and i have attached those, they are faded and my wheels are exactly on the faded parts, so i was going to use this initially as the basis for my appeal. (would i even get far with that?)
I am still within the first 14 days and have not made an informal appeal which i was going to do online. I have no access to any information on their website such as photos they took etc. I dont know whether to ask for those first or go straight in with the faded lines?
I have attached the PCN for possible errors?

Many thanks for any help








Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
5 Pages V  « < 3 4 5  
Start new topic
Replies (80 - 86)
Advertisement
post Sun, 24 Jun 2018 - 10:56
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
hcandersen
post Sun, 28 Oct 2018 - 14:49
Post #81


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 35,064
Joined: 2 Aug 2008
From: Woking
Member No.: 21,551



You miss the point: the NOR did not include the out of time information, so the owner wouldn't know.

Edit

My suggestion therefore uses this omission to bolster the will/may argument rather than use it as a strand on its own.

This post has been edited by hcandersen: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 - 16:12
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cp8759
post Sun, 28 Oct 2018 - 17:53
Post #82


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 38,006
Joined: 3 Dec 2010
Member No.: 42,618



QUOTE (hcandersen @ Sun, 28 Oct 2018 - 14:49) *
You miss the point: the NOR did not include the out of time information, so the owner wouldn't know.

Edit

My suggestion therefore uses this omission to bolster the will/may argument rather than use it as a strand on its own.

And I still think that, no matter how you frame it, it will detract from the argument that is being made. We're just going to have to agree to disagree on this one, but IMO will/may should comfortably win on its own.


--------------------
If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
freddy234
post Sun, 28 Oct 2018 - 20:42
Post #83


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 49
Joined: 24 Jun 2018
Member No.: 98,585



Thankyou all for your input. Submitted now, will update with the decision
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
freddy234
post Wed, 31 Oct 2018 - 19:04
Post #84


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 49
Joined: 24 Jun 2018
Member No.: 98,585



Decision below,

I'm actually shocked, I dont know if he has read the full document, He says that I simply said' see evidence' thats because it reached the word limit and i had to upload a wordDoc, so im not sure if he only saw the paragraph i managed to fit in the box!






This post has been edited by freddy234: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 - 19:05
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PASTMYBEST
post Wed, 31 Oct 2018 - 19:39
Post #85


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 26,655
Joined: 6 Nov 2014
Member No.: 74,048



A couple of things stink. TPT do not offer a personal hearing it must be requested and is then at the behest of an adjudicator. But that is not the reason for the alleged breach. but that's it unless you want to fork out thousands for a JR


--------------------
All advice is given freely. It is given without guarantee and responsibility for its use rests with the user
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cp8759
post Wed, 31 Oct 2018 - 22:34
Post #86


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 38,006
Joined: 3 Dec 2010
Member No.: 42,618



I would apply for a further review, saying the reviewing adjudicator did not see the ground of appeal document. I would hint that this might be due to a technical error on the TPT website. I would follow it up with a phone call to the LT to confirm the word doc has gone through correctly.


--------------------
If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
freddy234
post Mon, 12 Nov 2018 - 19:02
Post #87


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 49
Joined: 24 Jun 2018
Member No.: 98,585



So Just to update, adjudicator didnt read the whole document as apparently it was not 'uploaded'. I sent the doc by email, he had a look and decided he wasn't changing his mind on the decision. Nevertheless, thank you all for the support along the past few months.

Till next time!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  « < 3 4 5
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Friday, 29th March 2024 - 11:08
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here