PCN and removal, newham does it again |
PCN and removal, newham does it again |
Wed, 21 Feb 2018 - 11:14
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 78 Joined: 30 Nov 2017 Member No.: 95,356 |
hi friends,
They have done it again. This time i had parked my car at the place where i park everyday (no restriction) clearly displaying my visitors permit but was shocked to see my car removed. Best part is that i contacted them on the for the images for over 5 times and unfortunately they have still not send me any images infact the last one the customer assistant was very rude and hang the phone on me. now the PCN date is 2/2/2018. They have given my representation form, vehicle release receipt and this time provided with another sheet with important information. PCN Representation form inormation pg1 information pg2 information pg 3 vehicle release receipt visitor permit parking sign |
|
|
Advertisement |
Wed, 21 Feb 2018 - 11:14
Post
#
|
Advertise here! |
|
|
|
Sat, 31 Mar 2018 - 18:03
Post
#61
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 29,265 Joined: 16 Jan 2008 Member No.: 16,671 |
Do the permits come in a pad or bundle, so that it would be easy to unawares make an indemt on the permit below? Been asked before and answered. No, they come in perforated sheets of 4. It's feasible an indent could still be made but it would be unusual to directly line up on 3 boxes. I say 3 because there's a third one yet unmentioned. But what is intriguing me is how a CEO can possibly tell through a windscreen? Recording serial numbers? Or something else? When tinkering with brightness and contrast a shaded area shows up in the middle of each box. I have an idea to look at when I get a mo. -- As known to some members, questions asked through the back door, in general terms only, not case specific but no answers yet. -------------------- |
|
|
Thu, 5 Jul 2018 - 09:41
Post
#62
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 78 Joined: 30 Nov 2017 Member No.: 95,356 |
hello Everyone,
I now can share with you that i had appealed my case with adjudicator, who waived off the whole sum of money and today i received my cheque for £240 back from the council. just wanted to thank all those participated and helped regards ramesh |
|
|
Thu, 5 Jul 2018 - 09:44
Post
#63
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 26,655 Joined: 6 Nov 2014 Member No.: 74,048 |
hello Everyone, I now can share with you that i had appealed my case with adjudicator, who waived off the whole sum of money and today i received my cheque for £240 back from the council. just wanted to thank all those participated and helped regards ramesh Share the case number please -------------------- All advice is given freely. It is given without guarantee and responsibility for its use rests with the user
|
|
|
Thu, 5 Jul 2018 - 09:44
Post
#64
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 4,308 Joined: 9 May 2014 Member No.: 70,515 |
Well done
Please post upt the case number and/or the decision as may help others. |
|
|
Thu, 5 Jul 2018 - 09:49
Post
#65
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 78 Joined: 30 Nov 2017 Member No.: 95,356 |
31st May 2018
Case Reference: 2180166788 that is the case reference number. hope it helps |
|
|
Thu, 5 Jul 2018 - 10:11
Post
#66
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 4,308 Joined: 9 May 2014 Member No.: 70,515 |
Thank you.
Short and sweet - Adj found no evidence of re-use after he'd examined CEO's photos under magnification. You will have come across as an honest and credible witness/ |
|
|
Thu, 5 Jul 2018 - 14:13
Post
#67
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 29,265 Joined: 16 Jan 2008 Member No.: 16,671 |
Adj found no evidence of re-use after he'd examined CEO's photos under magnification. So a failure on the adjudicator's part or a failure by Newham to submit appropriate evidence? -------------------- |
|
|
Thu, 5 Jul 2018 - 14:19
Post
#68
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 26,655 Joined: 6 Nov 2014 Member No.: 74,048 |
Adj found no evidence of re-use after he'd examined CEO's photos under magnification. So a failure on the adjudicator's part or a failure by Newham to submit appropriate evidence? I think, a total absence of evidence. The reason we encouraged the OP. There are far to many of these " permit not filled in correctly or re used" from Newham and a tow on something as spurious as this must be bordering on misfeasance -------------------- All advice is given freely. It is given without guarantee and responsibility for its use rests with the user
|
|
|
Thu, 5 Jul 2018 - 15:07
Post
#69
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 29,265 Joined: 16 Jan 2008 Member No.: 16,671 |
Adj found no evidence of re-use after he'd examined CEO's photos under magnification. So a failure on the adjudicator's part or a failure by Newham to submit appropriate evidence? I think, a total absence of evidence. The reason we encouraged the OP. There are far to many of these " permit not filled in correctly or re used" from Newham and a tow on something as spurious as this must be bordering on misfeasance I'm not disputing the second half of that, as you know but evidence? Wasn't too difficult. -------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 14:51 |