Parking exemptions for aliens and deities |
Parking exemptions for aliens and deities |
Tue, 14 Jul 2020 - 14:30
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 38,006 Joined: 3 Dec 2010 Member No.: 42,618 |
Just spotted this in a templated paragraph from Folkestone & Hythe District Council and it made me smile, they've obviously had their fair share of FMOL/sovereign citizens:
I would like to advise that parking contraventions were decriminalised in the year 2000. Therefore, Shepway District Council do not pursue the recovery of parking contraventions through the court of law. Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs) are issued under the Traffic Management Act 2004, s82; Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) General Regulations 2007. I note your comments that you do not understand demands made upon you and the documentation sent to you. I would like to advise that the Notice to Owner document sent to you is an official document issued under the Traffic Management Act 2004. Therefore, if you do not understand the documentation I advise you to seek advice from either CAB or a firm of solicitors. I will now in turn respond to your questions 1 - 9. 1. The Dictionary definition of a 'person' is a 'human being and 'human being' is defined as a 'person'. 2. A 'person' is defined in many Acts of Parliament and is not relevant to the specific Act, the Traffic Management Act 2004 has not found the need to define 'person'. 3. I refer to the above answers. 4. Legal is something authorised by legislation and 'lawful' is undertaking a 'legal' task. 5. The Traffic Management Act 2004 dictates that the registered keeper of the vehicle is liable for the PCN. Therefore all correspondence has to be addressed to the registered keeper as provided from the DVLA or hirer/purchaser of that vehicle from the previously registered keeper. 6. The charge was the result of a parking contravention occurring. 7. Question not understood please elaborate on the information required, 8. The DVLA have identified ******* as the registered keeper of the vehicle who have in turn identified you as the buyer of the vehicle on ******** 9. Unless an alien or deity you would, I suspect, be a member of the Society of Humans. If you wish to further appeal against the penalty please refer to my previous letter and complete the appeal formal enclosed therewith. I will not enter into any further correspondence with you prior to this action This post has been edited by cp8759: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 - 14:30 -------------------- If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
|
|
|
Advertisement |
Tue, 14 Jul 2020 - 14:30
Post
#
|
Advertise here! |
|
|
|
Tue, 14 Jul 2020 - 15:00
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 33,610 Joined: 2 Apr 2008 From: Not in the UK Member No.: 18,483 |
At least they have a sense of humour.
-------------------- Moderator
Any comments made do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon. No lawyer/client relationship should be assumed nor should any duty of care be owed. |
|
|
Tue, 14 Jul 2020 - 18:44
Post
#3
|
||||
Webmaster Group: Root Admin Posts: 8,205 Joined: 30 Mar 2003 From: Wokingham, UK Member No.: 2 |
At least they have a sense of humour. IMO they've given the idiot far more time than was merited, so I assume it was largely (and understandably) for their own entertainment. Some of their definitions are a bit suspect, though. -------------------- Regards,
Fredd __________________________________________________________________________
|
|||
|
||||
Wed, 15 Jul 2020 - 17:48
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 3,283 Joined: 5 Jan 2012 Member No.: 52,178 |
But surely it all falls down when they cite a 2004 Act of Parliament and "many [other] Acts of Parliament". Because, as we know, there is ONLY the Magna Carta, or possibly the Bill of Rights, and no other action by Parliament since has any validity at all (in their eyes).
This post has been edited by The Slithy Tove: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 - 17:48 |
|
|
Wed, 15 Jul 2020 - 20:16
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 38,006 Joined: 3 Dec 2010 Member No.: 42,618 |
But surely it all falls down when they cite a 2004 Act of Parliament and "many [other] Acts of Parliament". Because, as we know, there is ONLY the Magna Carta, or possibly the Bill of Rights, and no other action by Parliament since has any validity at all (in their eyes). You're forgetting that the supreme source of all law is an old edition of Black's Law Dictionary -------------------- If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Friday, 29th March 2024 - 06:32 |