PCN addressed to a Mr and not Ms, Split from hijacked thread |
PCN addressed to a Mr and not Ms, Split from hijacked thread |
Tue, 4 Sep 2012 - 15:43
Post
#1
|
|
New Member Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 4 Sep 2012 Member No.: 56,960 |
Hi there
I have recieved a PCN addressed to a Mr and not Ms. It it valid? also the time they state the offence occurred is after the time shown on the pics taken from CCTV. Please help DEE72 |
|
|
Advertisement |
Tue, 4 Sep 2012 - 15:43
Post
#
|
Advertise here! |
|
|
|
Tue, 4 Sep 2012 - 18:15
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 20,919 Joined: 22 Apr 2012 Member No.: 54,455 |
Post up pics of the document, please, so we can look and give an opinion. However, I suspect the Mr vs Ms argument is irrelevant, but the offence times may be crucial. From what you say, this is an offence detected by CCTV where there are a whole barrelfull of potential objections to a PCN's validity. Councils love CCTV enforcement as it's so cheap to use it for issuing shedloads of PCNs, so they do this regardless of the legal mandates they are liable to obey.
|
|
|
Fri, 30 Nov 2018 - 16:58
Post
#3
|
|
New Member Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 30 Nov 2018 From: Essex Member No.: 101,211 |
It generally doesn't make any difference at all.
It may just mean the DVLA have incorrectly entered 'Mr' on the keepers details. -------------------- Been dealing with this stuff for too many years!
|
|
|
Fri, 30 Nov 2018 - 18:31
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 634 Joined: 8 Dec 2012 Member No.: 58,778 |
As well as posting the PCN also check the cars V5C document (log book). If that is correct I.e it has Ms xxx then I think this PCN could well be got out of.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Friday, 29th March 2024 - 11:35 |