PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

[NIP Wizard] A44 Worcester speed Camera, threads merged
Barnage
post Thu, 1 Oct 2009 - 18:28
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 1 Oct 2009
Member No.: 32,481



NIP Details and Circumstances
What is the name of the Constabulary? -
Date of the offence: - September 2009
Date of the NIP: - 6 days after the offence
Date you received the NIP: - 7 days after the offence
Location of offence (exact location as it appears on the NIP: important): - A44 New Rd towards Malvern (G), CA07 Worcester Bedwardine
Was the NIP addressed to you? - Yes
Was the NIP sent by first class post, second class or recorded delivery? - First
If your are not the Registered Keeper, what is your relationship to the vehicle? -
How many current points do you have? - 0
Provide a description of events (if you know what happened) telling us as much about the incident as possible - some things that may seem trivial to you may be important, so don't leave anything out. Please do not post personal details for obvious reasons - 36 in a 30. I just know that that this road and area is notorious so I am always very conscious along this bit of road. I actually remember vividly checking my speedometer on that day and made very sure I did not go above 30mph. There were cars in front and behind. I am able to admit when I am in the wrong, but I strongly feel this apparent speed is inaccurate. No pictures with NIP

NIP Wizard Responses
These were the responses used by the Wizard to arrive at its recommendation:
Have you received a NIP? - Yes
Are you the Registered Keeper of the vehicle concerned (is your name and address on the V5/V5C)? - Yes
Did the first NIP arrive within 14 days? - Yes
Although you are the Registered Keeper, were you also the keeper of the vehicle concerned (the person normally responsible for it) at the time of the alleged offence? - Yes
Were you driving? - Yes
Which country did the alleged offence take place in? - England

NIP Wizard Recommendation
Based on these responses the Wizard suggested that this course of action should be considered:
  • The law requires you to provide the information requested in the Section 172 notice within the 28 day period, naming yourself as the driver. If you are considering obtaining formal legal advice, do so before returning the notice.

    You should note that there is nothing to be gained by responding any earlier than you have to at any stage of the process. You are likely to receive a Conditional Offer of a Fixed Penalty (COFP) and further reminder(s). If you want to continue the fight, you should ignore all correspondence from the police until you receive a summons. You need to understand from the outset that while you will receive much help and support from members on the forums, you will need to put time and effort into fighting your case and ultimately be prepared to stand up in court to defend yourself.

Generated by the PePiPoo NIP Wizard v3.3.2: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:28:15 +0100
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 19)
Advertisement
post Thu, 1 Oct 2009 - 18:28
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Hotel Oscar 87
post Thu, 1 Oct 2009 - 18:40
Post #2


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 3,737
Joined: 23 Sep 2006
From: Way, way off-shore
Member No.: 7,833



At the speed alleged you are likely to receive a conditional offer of fixed penalty (i.e. £60 and 3 points). West Mercia are planning a Speed Awareness Course but would seem not to have implemented it as this stage. If it was available you would have had to pay for it (usually a fee adjacent to the fixed penalty fine) but there are no points to attached attending one.

Your being offered the fixed penalty will be dependant upon your replying to the NIP within the 28 days stipulated.

This post has been edited by Hotel Oscar 87: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 - 18:41


--------------------
“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a tu.rd by the clean end.” - R.J. Wiedemann, Lt. Col. USMC Ret.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Barnage
post Thu, 1 Oct 2009 - 18:48
Post #3


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 1 Oct 2009
Member No.: 32,481



I have got the option of attending the course and I will go down this route. It's just I am 99% sure I did not drive 36mph. I remember looking about 5 times at my speedo on that day, at the time of alleged offence on that particular stretch of road. That's whats got me puzzled? Are these cameras accurate, is there an error margin. It was bright sunshine that day I remember it well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Barnage
post Sun, 4 Oct 2009 - 18:56
Post #4


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 1 Oct 2009
Member No.: 32,481







This post has been edited by Barnage: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 - 20:14
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pete D
post Sun, 4 Oct 2009 - 19:01
Post #5


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,748
Joined: 4 Apr 2007
Member No.: 11,456



If this was a Gatso both shots will be from the rear. Why do you mention the front.
http://www.abd.org.uk/gatso_photo_checking.htm
Spacing is 5ft or 2 metres 3.2808 ft
Pete D


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Barnage
post Sun, 4 Oct 2009 - 19:11
Post #6


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 1 Oct 2009
Member No.: 32,481





This post has been edited by Barnage: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 - 20:15
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BaggieBoy
post Sun, 4 Oct 2009 - 19:14
Post #7


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 6,374
Joined: 3 Apr 2006
From: North Hampshire
Member No.: 5,183



Use the same point of the vehicle when trying to determine the number of markers traveled between shots, trying to use different points would make it very hard to work out.

QUOTE (Pete D @ Sun, 4 Oct 2009 - 20:01) *
Spacing is 5ft or 2 metres 3.2808 ft

Although we did have one case recently where the makers were 3 feet apart...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
andy_foster
post Sun, 4 Oct 2009 - 19:18
Post #8


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 20,767
Joined: 9 Sep 2004
From: Reading
Member No.: 1,624



You've started a duplicate thread!


--------------------
Andy

"Whatever the intention of Parliament was, or was not, the law is quite clear." - The Rookie
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Barnage
post Sun, 4 Oct 2009 - 19:39
Post #9


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 1 Oct 2009
Member No.: 32,481







This post has been edited by Barnage: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 - 20:16
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Barnage
post Sun, 4 Oct 2009 - 20:08
Post #10


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 1 Oct 2009
Member No.: 32,481



OK, based on 5 ft and passing 4 of the white markers I have worked out; 4 x 5ft x 0.6818 / 0.5 = 27.27 mph. So why does NIP state 36??
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BaggieBoy
post Sun, 4 Oct 2009 - 20:43
Post #11


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 6,374
Joined: 3 Apr 2006
From: North Hampshire
Member No.: 5,183



Do you know that the marks are 5 feet apart for sure?

If they were 2 metres apart that would be very close to 36 MPH.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Barnage
post Sun, 4 Oct 2009 - 20:54
Post #12


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 1 Oct 2009
Member No.: 32,481







This post has been edited by Barnage: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 - 20:17
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BaggieBoy
post Sun, 4 Oct 2009 - 21:02
Post #13


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 6,374
Joined: 3 Apr 2006
From: North Hampshire
Member No.: 5,183



The quality of the pics is terrible, I couldn't determine anything from them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
andy_foster
post Sun, 4 Oct 2009 - 21:19
Post #14


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 20,767
Joined: 9 Sep 2004
From: Reading
Member No.: 1,624



Looks like about 4 lines to me.
BTW, a 2002 VW Polo hatchback is 3897 mm long - not far off 4 m.


--------------------
Andy

"Whatever the intention of Parliament was, or was not, the law is quite clear." - The Rookie
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Barnage
post Sun, 4 Oct 2009 - 21:42
Post #15


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 1 Oct 2009
Member No.: 32,481



Oh the shaaaame if they are 2 metres icon_redface.gif . Nortee
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glasgow_bhoy
post Sun, 4 Oct 2009 - 22:43
Post #16


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 10,460
Joined: 8 Sep 2008
Member No.: 22,424



Just go n measure them!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pete D
post Mon, 5 Oct 2009 - 09:41
Post #17


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,748
Joined: 4 Apr 2007
Member No.: 11,456



I recall a case on here some time ago at that location but can not find it but the OP went and measured them at they were 2M spacing. There was even a guy on a push bike in the shot. Regards Peter

This post has been edited by Pete D: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 - 17:49
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hotel Oscar 87
post Mon, 5 Oct 2009 - 22:48
Post #18


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 3,737
Joined: 23 Sep 2006
From: Way, way off-shore
Member No.: 7,833



Whilst Google Maps is hardly the best yardstick there are sufficient markings visible between the trees to be able to make a "best guess" as to spacing. Insufficient markings fall into the 50' scale for it to be 5' but using the 20m scale its virtually bang on 5 spaces/6 markings in 10m. This would seem to suggest the spacing is at 2m.


--------------------
“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a tu.rd by the clean end.” - R.J. Wiedemann, Lt. Col. USMC Ret.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
desktop_demon
post Tue, 6 Oct 2009 - 09:24
Post #19


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 3,236
Joined: 22 Jul 2008
From: South of the border.
Member No.: 21,303



Wow that gatso installation is certainly on a curved road. I bet the radius of curvature on that road is not 1200m!

The scans posted up are rather difficult to make out properly. Is it possible for the Op to post up some more detailed scans or at higher resolution. The distance travelled does seem close to four gaps (8m in 0.5seconds) but it is difficult to see precisely on the pictures supplied.


--------------------
When your life finally flashes in front of you - let's hope there's something worth watching.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mugtree
post Tue, 6 Oct 2009 - 21:56
Post #20


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 17 Sep 2009
Member No.: 32,085



As I suggested in a post which has been moved to another thread rolleyes.gif I went past that site today. Actually pulled off the road in the middle of the markings to measure them for you - didn't have a tape measure, so not that accurate, using a couple of long poles I had in the car and some sticky tape along with a 1m rule when I got home. Made the distance about 1.9m, which given said accuracy probably means they're 2m apart (even standing by the side of the road looking at them closely they seem far closer than that to the naked eye!) Very definitely more than 5ft, given my measuring pole is 5'2" long and was nowhere near spanning the gap. Sorry for the bad news - I'm guessing from the evidence available that means they have a case (not that surprised given I've driven past there hundreds of times at ~30mph and never been flashed or seen anybody else flashed, which would suggest they don't get you if you're not speeding).

Any chance of telling me how you got those photos, given I've written to West Mercia asking for some for my case and had no reply. Did you write and ask for them, and if so, what did you write?

p.s. Whilst the road looks curved in the shot, the bit the gatso is on seems pretty straight (I was actually quite surprised how curved the road looks in the photo, given I'd always thought it was fairly straight - for reference, http://www.streetmap.co.uk/map.srf?X=38447...p;A=Y&Z=115 is just about where I pulled off the road in the middle of the markings).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Tuesday, 10th December 2019 - 16:47
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.