PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Speeding accusations
618hotlap
post Tue, 20 Feb 2018 - 19:59
Post #1


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 20 Feb 2018
Member No.: 96,665



Hi been accused of speeding
Works van I’m the director I don’t know who was driving at the time any ideas as to what to do next many thanksalso this is the first correspondence I’ve had I did not receive the first letter
There is no name other than the company name on the logbook of the vehicle

This post has been edited by 618hotlap: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 - 20:01
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 10)
Advertisement
post Tue, 20 Feb 2018 - 19:59
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
andy_foster
post Tue, 20 Feb 2018 - 20:03
Post #2


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 24,220
Joined: 9 Sep 2004
From: Reading
Member No.: 1,624



QUOTE (618hotlap @ Tue, 20 Feb 2018 - 19:59) *
Hi been accused of speeding


Who has? You haven't. The unknown driver of the vehicle has.

QUOTE
Works van I’m the director I don’t know who was driving at the time any ideas as to what to do next many thanks


Who is the NIP addressed to? Is it addressed to you personally, or the limited company?


--------------------
Andy

Some people think that I make them feel stupid. To be fair, they deserve most of the credit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jlc
post Tue, 20 Feb 2018 - 20:35
Post #3


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41,585
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
From: Planet Earth
Member No.: 49,223



It seems addressed to a body corporate (company) which isn't an issue per se. The company would be expected to respond accordingly. (This would be a company secretary or director usually)

For companies it would be considered reasonable to keep records of who was driving the car, i.e. logs. (Or it was assigned to someone permanently, i.e. keeping the vehicle)

If the company cannot nominate the driver then they can still be prosecuted for the s172 offence for failing to furnish driver details. Whilst a company cannot be issued with points they can receive a large fine and costs. (There is the opportunity to pursue a director under certain conditions but is rarely used)

There's possibly an argument about the 'missing' NIP but this does not override the request to name the driver. The burden of proof of showing this NIP didn't arrive within the necessary period rests on the defendant though and not on the Police.


--------------------
RK=Registered Keeper, OP=Original Poster (You!), CoFP=Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty, NtK=Notice to Keeper, NtD=Notice to Driver
PoFA=Protection of Freedoms Act, SAC=Safety Awareness Course, NIP=Notice of Intended Prosecution, ADR=Alternative Dispute Resolution
PPC=Private Parking Company, LBCCC=Letter Before County Court Claim, PII=Personally Identifiable Information, SAR=Subject Access Request

Private Parking - remember, they just want your money and will say almost anything to get it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
618hotlap
post Tue, 20 Feb 2018 - 22:06
Post #4


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 20 Feb 2018
Member No.: 96,665



QUOTE (andy_foster @ Tue, 20 Feb 2018 - 20:03) *
QUOTE (618hotlap @ Tue, 20 Feb 2018 - 19:59) *
Hi been accused of speeding


Who has? You haven't. The unknown driver of the vehicle has.

QUOTE
Works van I’m the director I don’t know who was driving at the time any ideas as to what to do next many thanks


Who is the NIP addressed to? Is it addressed to you personally, or the limited company?



I’m not sure how I’m supposed to reply to these yes it’s a limited company

What’s NIP stand for
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jlc
post Tue, 20 Feb 2018 - 22:15
Post #5


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41,585
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
From: Planet Earth
Member No.: 49,223



Notice Intended Prosecution


--------------------
RK=Registered Keeper, OP=Original Poster (You!), CoFP=Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty, NtK=Notice to Keeper, NtD=Notice to Driver
PoFA=Protection of Freedoms Act, SAC=Safety Awareness Course, NIP=Notice of Intended Prosecution, ADR=Alternative Dispute Resolution
PPC=Private Parking Company, LBCCC=Letter Before County Court Claim, PII=Personally Identifiable Information, SAR=Subject Access Request

Private Parking - remember, they just want your money and will say almost anything to get it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
andy_foster
post Tue, 20 Feb 2018 - 22:17
Post #6


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 24,220
Joined: 9 Sep 2004
From: Reading
Member No.: 1,624



Either you find out who was driving and name them, or the company is prosecuted for failing to name the driver. The company (a body corporate) cannot get points as it is not a natural person and cannot hold a driving licence. However, it also cannot use the defence of reasonable diligence unless it can show that the failure to keep a record of who was driving was reasonable.

Notice of Intended Prosecution.


--------------------
Andy

Some people think that I make them feel stupid. To be fair, they deserve most of the credit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Colin_S
post Wed, 21 Feb 2018 - 08:21
Post #7


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 291
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Member No.: 59,321



How many people could have potentially driven the vehicle on that day?

Is it possible by perhaps looking at job sheets, time sheets, invoices, etc. to narrow the list down?

Have you questioned the likely 'culprits'?

You can ask for photographic evidence to help identify the driver (probably won't help unless the camera was facing the front of the vehicle).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dwaynedouglas
post Wed, 21 Feb 2018 - 08:25
Post #8


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 96
Joined: 9 Nov 2016
Member No.: 88,346



QUOTE (Colin_S @ Wed, 21 Feb 2018 - 08:21) *
You can ask for photographic evidence to help identify the driver (probably won't help unless the camera was facing the front of the vehicle).


I see people on this site are usually discouraged from asking for evidence, just pictures to help identify the driver.



--------------------
I'm not a lawyer or legally trained, my opinion is based on my experience - follow at your own risk.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Rookie
post Wed, 21 Feb 2018 - 08:27
Post #9


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 56,261
Joined: 9 Sep 2003
From: Warwickshire
Member No.: 317



If you dont know who of those in the van WAS driving, you have a choice to either
1/ Name the person 'in charge' of the van that day
and/or
2/ Name all those in the van that day.

If you cannot name THE driver you aid any defence by providing police with all the information you could that would help them to identify the driver.

The relevant statute is here
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/172

How was the van used, would the company be considered 'the keeper' (not registered keeper) or 'any other person'?


--------------------
There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!

S172's
Rookies 1-0 Kent

Council PCN's
Rookies 1-0 Warwick
Rookies 1-0 Birmingham

PPC PCN's
Rookies 10-0 PPC's
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
peterguk
post Wed, 21 Feb 2018 - 08:51
Post #10


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 13,735
Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Member No.: 14,720



QUOTE (Dwaynedouglas @ Wed, 21 Feb 2018 - 08:25) *
QUOTE (Colin_S @ Wed, 21 Feb 2018 - 08:21) *
You can ask for photographic evidence to help identify the driver (probably won't help unless the camera was facing the front of the vehicle).


I see people on this site are usually discouraged from asking for evidence, just pictures to help identify the driver.




You are correct - badly worded advice.

This post has been edited by peterguk: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 - 11:08


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Rookie
post Wed, 21 Feb 2018 - 09:46
Post #11


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 56,261
Joined: 9 Sep 2003
From: Warwickshire
Member No.: 317



Ignore

This post has been edited by The Rookie: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 - 15:59


--------------------
There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!

S172's
Rookies 1-0 Kent

Council PCN's
Rookies 1-0 Warwick
Rookies 1-0 Birmingham

PPC PCN's
Rookies 10-0 PPC's
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Tuesday, 16th April 2024 - 20:27
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here