PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

County Parking Enforcement Agency
chairmanmiaow
post Tue, 25 Jun 2019 - 19:11
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 29 Jul 2018
Member No.: 99,139



The driver received a PCN on their windscreen from County Parking Enforcement Agency back in Feb, with a reason of 'parked causing an obstruction'. They have photographs of the position of the vehicle at the time and it wasn't causing an obstruction.

CPEA sent an escalating letter chaing which is now at 'Notice of intended court action' from Debt Recovery Plus Ltd.

They are a member of IPC so didn't even bother with appeal.

Do we need to do anything?

This post has been edited by chairmanmiaow: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 - 11:09
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 5)
Advertisement
post Tue, 25 Jun 2019 - 19:11
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Dave65
post Tue, 25 Jun 2019 - 20:33
Post #2


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 1,887
Joined: 16 Jul 2015
Member No.: 78,368



Edit your post and give no hint has to who may have drove the vehicle.
" the driver" did everything.
What else have you received since the windscreen ticket?

Have you contacted anyone?
Generally DRP can be ignored.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chairmanmiaow
post Wed, 26 Jun 2019 - 11:12
Post #3


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 29 Jul 2018
Member No.: 99,139



Thanks.

No, we haven't replied at all. Notice to keeper received, a couple of letters from the original parking company, and a few letters from DRP. They were sending letters to an old address, but they have done a trace and are sending them to new address now.


(EDITED - changed NTO to NTK, my mistake)

This post has been edited by chairmanmiaow: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 - 10:16
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nosferatu1001
post Wed, 26 Jun 2019 - 12:29
Post #4


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 28,687
Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Member No.: 15,642



Notice to Keeper recieved. NtO Is cuoncil statutory and they must not use that term for a private parking matter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chairmanmiaow
post Wed, 26 Jun 2019 - 14:58
Post #5


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 29 Jul 2018
Member No.: 99,139



QUOTE (nosferatu1001 @ Wed, 26 Jun 2019 - 13:29) *
Notice to Keeper recieved. NtO Is cuoncil statutory and they must not use that term for a private parking matter.



oops - sorry, you're right, it would have been a notice to keeper. It was originally a windscreen ticket.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ostell
post Wed, 26 Jun 2019 - 16:51
Post #6


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 17,088
Joined: 8 Mar 2013
Member No.: 60,457



So is the NTK capable of holding the keeper liable?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Friday, 29th March 2024 - 11:47
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here