PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Merton. One box unscratched in ½ day Parking Permit = PCN.
ZigZagZog
post Wed, 11 Jul 2018 - 20:53
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Member No.: 25,544



My mate John was issued PCN by Merton Council. On the Half Day Parking Permit he used he omitted scratching clear the 'month' box.

Any chance of a succesful appeal against this PCN?

TIA











This post has been edited by ZigZagZog: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 - 13:50
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Start new topic
Replies (20 - 25)
Advertisement
post Wed, 11 Jul 2018 - 20:53
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
ZigZagZog
post Tue, 17 Jul 2018 - 19:12
Post #21


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Member No.: 25,544



QUOTE (stamfordman @ Tue, 17 Jul 2018 - 20:06) *
Looks good to me - may give them a laugh. I take it John is standing for leader of the Silly Party.


I don't understand your post & don't know whether you're taking the piss or not. John is in his v. early 20's & has to work about 5 hours (after deductions, taxes, travel costs etc) to pay this PCN.

Does it look good to you?

Why would it give them a laugh?

Why do you think he's standing for the leader of the Silly Party?

This post has been edited by ZigZagZog: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 - 19:18
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stamfordman
post Tue, 17 Jul 2018 - 19:21
Post #22


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 6,773
Joined: 12 Feb 2013
From: London
Member No.: 59,924



Ah you're too young for Monty Python.

The challenge is rather over the top in begging for forgiveness - but it doesn't really matter and will do.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ZigZagZog
post Tue, 17 Jul 2018 - 19:29
Post #23


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Member No.: 25,544



OK, apologies, I misinterpreted your post.

(Don't think Monty P has aged very well.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stamfordman
post Tue, 17 Jul 2018 - 19:58
Post #24


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 6,773
Joined: 12 Feb 2013
From: London
Member No.: 59,924



QUOTE (ZigZagZog @ Tue, 17 Jul 2018 - 20:29) *
(Don't think Monty P has aged very well.)



Neither have I.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ZigZagZog
post Wed, 18 Jul 2018 - 10:38
Post #25


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Member No.: 25,544



No further input from the panel so can I take it the grovelling apology / discretionary dismissal request in post 19 http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?s=&...t&p=1399873 is good to go as is?

TIA.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PASTMYBEST
post Wed, 18 Jul 2018 - 11:05
Post #26


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 12,959
Joined: 6 Nov 2014
Member No.: 74,048



QUOTE (ZigZagZog @ Wed, 18 Jul 2018 - 11:38) *
No further input from the panel so can I take it the grovelling apology / discretionary dismissal request in post 19 http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?s=&...t&p=1399873 is good to go as is?

TIA.


2160272793

Appeal decision
Appeal allowed
Direction
cancel the Penalty Charge Notice and the Notice to Owner.
Reasons
This PCN was issued for the alleged contravention of being parked in a permit space or zone in Pennyroyal Avenue at 2.38pm on 11 April 2016 without clearly displaying a valid permit.
I have looked at the CEO's images. These show that Mr Overlingas' van was parked in a space which was clearly signed as being for parking by permit holders only during the controlled hours of 9am to 6.30pm Mondays to Fridays.
The images show that there was a visitor's permit displayed in the windscreen of the van which was clearly scratched for the date of 11 April 2016. I can see no alteration of the date.
The Council says that the permit was not valid because Mr Overlingas had not written in the time of arrival.
The sole purpose of having a field for the time of arrival is so that the CEO can see whether or not the motorist has overstayed the 6 hours of parking time permitted by the permit. It must have been very clear to the issuing CEO that the permitted 6 hours of parking had not been exceeded in this case. The controlled hours began at 9am and the PCN was issued at 2.38pm. I am satisfied that the permit displayed was valid for parking in the circumstances.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Sunday, 22nd July 2018 - 09:07
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.