PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

733 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 

Neil B
Posted on: Today, 10:26


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


You've obscured all the essential info on the PCN.
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1376146 · Replies: 6 · Views: 94

Neil B
Posted on: Yesterday, 23:29


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


luvvly jubbly.

Much appreciated cp. I'll pass it on.
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1376109 · Replies: 20 · Views: 532

Neil B
Posted on: Yesterday, 23:17


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


Do bear in mind only Mother can do this, or gives you written authority.
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1376107 · Replies: 34 · Views: 757

Neil B
Posted on: Yesterday, 19:41


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


jonouk

Scrub my idea. It is no longer relevant.
I've just noticed that the rejection was dated 26th Match but you only told us on the 16th April?

So your deadline to submit an appeal is close - 24th

Go ahead and get it registered, now, with details to follow.

Just say 'I rely on my original representations and other matters arising. Full details to follow.'
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1376049 · Replies: 34 · Views: 757

Neil B
Posted on: Yesterday, 17:11


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


Easy in hindsight but why weren't you following TfL online status or telling us you were missing OfR or
checking registration with TEC?

I think that you wrote to them will help.

Need to see that and the Equita notice.
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1376017 · Replies: 3 · Views: 103

Neil B
Posted on: Yesterday, 12:14


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


QUOTE (cp8759 @ Wed, 18 Apr 2018 - 19:49) *
QUOTE (Neil B @ Wed, 18 Apr 2018 - 12:13) *
Ok, hard to get a simple answer but it seems it's the standard 'Essentials' policy.

We need the start date of the policy to find the correct policy wording.

August 2016, renewed 2017.

Insurance surveyor came yesterday. Friendly, thorough and she will hear more next week.
In response to 'is this covered?' he basically answered that he needed to do the same as you - check the policy.

Saga sold but Legal & General the insurer. I'm unsure of the connection.
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1375922 · Replies: 20 · Views: 532

Neil B
Posted on: Yesterday, 12:00


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


QUOTE (PASTMYBEST @ Fri, 20 Apr 2018 - 12:58) *
QUOTE (Neil B @ Fri, 20 Apr 2018 - 10:46) *
Sent you a PM.


Report from rsg444 that he won on the 21 vs 14 day argument

Yeah saw it.
I'll explain to Jono what I'm thinking, when I get a mo and copy you in.
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1375917 · Replies: 34 · Views: 757

Neil B
Posted on: Yesterday, 09:46


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


Sent you a PM.
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1375852 · Replies: 34 · Views: 757

Neil B
Posted on: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 - 23:19


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


Just tell us the location mate.

Your pics omit the crucial one, the sign.
I think we've already guessed what it says.
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1375783 · Replies: 3 · Views: 137

Neil B
Posted on: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 - 11:56


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


Look like DY lines to me.

No signs needed.
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1375592 · Replies: 4 · Views: 139

Neil B
Posted on: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 - 08:25


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


Newham are just being stubborn. The delay in issuing the NtO is an indication they are backed into
a corner imo. Why they behave so childishly I don't know.

We've shown you how adjudicators tend to view these cases (positively) and I see no reason yours
will not be viewed similarly.

So you now need to make representations against the NtO, basically repeating everything so far.
+ I think Mick's point of 'wrong contravention' should be added.
Best to do this under headings covering the issues.

The contravention did not occur.
A valid permit was displayed, correctly completed and there is no evidence to the contrary.

The contravention, as alleged, did not occur.
Even if the Council believe the permit was invalid, the lesser penalty of contravention code '19' applies.

The PCN is invalid.
Missing mandatory content as previously pointed out.

Failure to consider.
No response to my challenge of 13th Feb and the points raised therein.

Just an outline and we'll help with wording.

-----
Just a quick heads up fo AT and members.
We've had a few of these and found that some people are actually cheating with these permits.
Moreover, they have directly lied to this forum.
I've found this by tinkering with contrast and brightness of the VP images.

IN THIS CASE, I have no reason to doubt AT at all and cannot see any evidence of the permit being
used more than once.
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1375554 · Replies: 44 · Views: 1,633

Neil B
Posted on: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 - 19:42


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/Anglers...&authuser=0
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1375494 · Replies: 29 · Views: 915

Neil B
Posted on: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 - 18:58


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


QUOTE (cp8759 @ Wed, 18 Apr 2018 - 19:49) *
QUOTE (Neil B @ Wed, 18 Apr 2018 - 12:13) *
Ok, hard to get a simple answer but it seems it's the standard 'Essentials' policy.

We need the start date of the policy to find the correct policy wording.

Ok I'm there tomorrow. Will update.

Thanks.
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1375470 · Replies: 20 · Views: 532

Neil B
Posted on: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 - 15:34


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


QUOTE (Popeye999 @ Wed, 18 Apr 2018 - 16:23) *
I mean that i dont know how to download the video without showing the number plate details etc. i can take screenshots? if that helps?

Don't thousands of people see your VRM daily?
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1375392 · Replies: 14 · Views: 240

Neil B
Posted on: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 - 14:48


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


QUOTE (Popeye999 @ Wed, 18 Apr 2018 - 13:29) *
I have no idea how to without sharing my details unfortunately :/

What details?
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1375381 · Replies: 14 · Views: 240

Neil B
Posted on: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 - 11:20


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


QUOTE (MarkBerg @ Wed, 18 Apr 2018 - 12:10) *
I assume that letter would be considered as formal representations?

No because you can't tell us at which stage you wrote to them.
Is correspondence not in your computer?
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1375313 · Replies: 31 · Views: 729

Neil B
Posted on: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 - 11:13


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


QUOTE (cp8759 @ Tue, 17 Apr 2018 - 00:46) *
QUOTE (Neil B @ Mon, 16 Apr 2018 - 18:15) *
Thanks cp.

There's a link to 'summary of cover' on this page -
https://www.saga.co.uk/insurance/home-insur...dings-insurance

Please ask your friend whether it's the standard or tailored policy, and the date the policy started, that link has all the policy booklets, just need to identify the right one.

Ok, hard to get a simple answer but it seems it's the standard 'Essentials' policy.

I now have more of the story and it's worrying.
Water Co fitted a new stopcock in front garden a few months ago. Informed friend's partner that they registered a leak somewhere inside.
Partner understood from them it was minor and no immediate action was required: It was an 'as and when you have access to pipes' comment.
Whether partner's understanding is accurate is anyone's guess.

This is confirmed by what I saw: There is extensive dry rot and wet rot damage beneath the suspended floor, indicating that there has been
a leak, to some degree, for maybe over a year at least.
I don't believe the heavy leak could have been responsible; that must have happened very recently due to freezing weather
followed by a relatively quick warm up.

I guess I best duck before the comments but all are welcome.
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1375309 · Replies: 20 · Views: 532

Neil B
Posted on: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 - 22:32


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


I only found this -

the provisions of The Waltham Forest (Waiting and Loading Restriction) (Amendment No. 9) Experimental Traffic Order 2013 so that waiting restrictions operate between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. Mondays to Fridays inclusive in the LNE CPZ on a permanent basis (except where other waiting and loading restrictions apply);


but no Notice to announce those "other" restrictions.
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1375231 · Replies: 10 · Views: 202

Neil B
Posted on: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 - 22:00


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


AT.

Can you show us the follow up challenge you sent back in February please.
The one they haven't responded to.
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1375224 · Replies: 44 · Views: 1,633

Neil B
Posted on: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 - 21:56


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


QUOTE (MrChips @ Tue, 17 Apr 2018 - 22:36) *
I'll probably keep that up our sleeve for now (if they aren't going to accept the CC flaw in reps, they won't accept the payment slip flaw either I expect). I'm hoping they increase the charge on the online portal before 23 April which would then mean the charge is more than is due going by the payment slip. If I tell them about the contradiction in my reps they may realise not to increase it. If I also point it out now, it's clear that I am aware of the issue and it weakens the argument that I am prejudiced by it (perhaps?).

I can always bring it up later if/when it goes to adjudication.

Current plan is to submit reps very late on Thursday. I can then say I was worried we'd missed the deadline for Barnet to reoffer the discount so decided to quit while we still had the discount in play, only for Barnet to move the goalposts. It's also then the case that we can say if challenged that we didn't leave it until the last possible minute to appeal, we appealed with 4 days to spare wink.gif

I understand but it can also weaken the argument: At the mo you have a PCN; you query the PCN.

Since they will only progress to full amount if they don't not on system your reps received and unlikely they'll read promptly, then it
doesn't alert them to anything.

It's up to you.
If including it could be as simple as >

'I am confused as to when the discount period expires. The PCN first states "----------------------", then, later, "---------------------------",
which I calculate to be some four days later. Please explain.'


Note that this increases the chance they will trip themselves up, by words or indeed actions meanwhile.

  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1375221 · Replies: 40 · Views: 1,209

Neil B
Posted on: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 - 21:30


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


Not including the misleading payment slip?
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1375211 · Replies: 40 · Views: 1,209

Neil B
Posted on: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 - 20:47


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


QUOTE (LuvsJustice @ Tue, 17 Apr 2018 - 20:10) *
QUOTE (Neil B @ Tue, 17 Apr 2018 - 19:44) *
QUOTE (LuvsJustice @ Tue, 17 Apr 2018 - 17:56) *
There is a single yellow line within the parking bay

I can't find a Gazette notice for any Order that might relate to this.

Get hold of the relevant TMO from Council.


I requested the Traffic Order (think that's the same thing?) from the council when I emailed requested pictures

Good.
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1375200 · Replies: 10 · Views: 202

Neil B
Posted on: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 - 20:31


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


QUOTE (MarkBerg @ Tue, 17 Apr 2018 - 21:22) *
Should I request from the council that a file of all correspondence be sent to me?

Would be useful but they're reportedly impossible to contact.
(You could ask your Councillor to help with getting a response - but only that: They may not
intervene otherwise)

My problem is that you say you had respones. It then sounds like you didn't pursue further.

The OfR allows you to make a sworn Statement but without knowing or understanding what has happened you can't.
There are only 4 tick-box options.
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1375197 · Replies: 31 · Views: 729

Neil B
Posted on: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 - 20:20


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


QUOTE (MarkBerg @ Tue, 17 Apr 2018 - 21:01) *
Thanks for the advise. Should I respond to the letter and say that I will wait for the OfR as was suggested in the other post, or should I just wait? Also someone advised me to contact my local councilor to get them to potentially intervene. Is that worth doing?

You could answer the first question; what "standard letters" ?

QUOTE (Mad Mick V @ Tue, 17 Apr 2018 - 20:37) *
Westminster tried this tactic and got their heads handed to them on a platter at Review.

The worry is that this is the second Ealing case we have seen this week.

If the OP believes that there are unanswered issue or that his representations have been ignored the delay in responding is unfair without adequate explanation. That is the key to this case ---the Council has not responded either to informal challenges or formal representations---an audit trail would be good. That should take care of the OfR stage.

Now we can supplement the unfairness angle with the following:-

The Council probably believes it can pursue this "debt" under the Limitation Act. However, against that, there must be a breach of Art 6 ECHR in that these cases have not or nor cannot be brought to adjudication under the "reasonable time" requirement.

Here's a little snippet on the latter (bit out of date):-

http://europeanlawblog.eu/2013/12/09/the-r...-and-charybdis/

Mick

No dispute Ealing are out of order but opening post sounds like OP complicit.
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1375192 · Replies: 31 · Views: 729

Neil B
Posted on: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 - 18:52


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 18,524
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Member No.: 16,671


QUOTE (MarkBerg @ Tue, 17 Apr 2018 - 19:47) *
I just got standard letters back not addressing the fact that the fault was with them

Does not sound good.
These 'letters' were titled as --?
  Forum: Council Parking Tickets & Clamping and Decr... · Post Preview: #1375169 · Replies: 31 · Views: 729

733 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 

New Posts  New Replies
No New Posts  No New Replies
Hot topic  Hot Topic (New)
No new  Hot Topic (No New)
Poll  Poll (New)
No new votes  Poll (No New)
Closed  Locked Topic
Moved  Moved Topic
 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Saturday, 21st April 2018 - 13:11
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.