PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Penalty notice - Redhill Station Car Park
Millter
post Thu, 18 Apr 2019 - 11:14
Post #1


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 18 Apr 2019
Member No.: 103,480



Hello, the driver has just received a penalty notice for "failing to obtain a valid ticket or voucher" form the PCN Admin Centre in charge of Redhill station car park.

Annoyingly the driver did pay for parking that day on the app but paid for one car (the default car reg that comes up on the app to repeat payment) and on that day parked a different car, which is ALSO registered on the same app but not the default and didn't change it.

Is there anything that the driver can do?

Many thanks in advance

This post has been edited by Millter: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 - 14:04
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 14)
Advertisement
post Thu, 18 Apr 2019 - 11:14
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
HappyHarry
post Thu, 18 Apr 2019 - 11:41
Post #2


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 162
Joined: 14 Dec 2018
From: Sussex
Member No.: 101,446



You have my complete sympathy. I have had a saga over Redhill station. Start by editing your post so the driver isn’t identified. Wait until the 11th hour to appeal. That will be rejected. Then do 2nd level appeal which will also be rejected. These railway penalties time out after 6 months, so drag out every part of the process for as long as possible.


--------------------
“Nobody leaves their house because they want to go and do some parking; parking is simply a means to an end, and it should be as easy as possible.” Rishi Sunak, MP
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Millter
post Thu, 18 Apr 2019 - 12:41
Post #3


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 18 Apr 2019
Member No.: 103,480



Ok will suggest this, thank you!

This post has been edited by Millter: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 - 14:06
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dramaqueen
post Thu, 18 Apr 2019 - 12:47
Post #4


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 1 Jul 2014
From: east sussex
Member No.: 71,587



There are lots of recent Indigo/Saba threads - have a search through here and on MSE. As you'll see, it's a big scam so don't even think of paying.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cabbyman
post Thu, 18 Apr 2019 - 13:35
Post #5


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 6,898
Joined: 15 Dec 2007
From: South of John O'Groats, north of Cape Town.
Member No.: 16,066



Dear sirs,

ref xxxxx VRN xxxxxxx

I am in receipt of your above mentioned communication, addressed to me as Registered Keeper, purporting to offer me a way out of being prosecuted for an alleged offence against railway byelaw 14. Your blackmail will not succeed on at least three counts:

1. 'Failure to obtain a valid ticket or voucher' is not a byelaw offence.

2. The competent authority , not you, could only prosecute the driver, IF a byelaw offence has been committed. I, as Registered Keeper, have no liability under byelaws. For the avoidance of doubt, I have no obligation in law to name the driver and will not be so doing.

3. The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 does not apply because land under statutory control, ie byelaws, is specifically excluded from the provisions.

As you have now been made aware of the above, any further contact that you, or your agents, make with me, save confirming cancellation of the purported charge, will be a serious offence under data protection legislation. IF you are daft enough to continue harrassing me, now that you have been made fully aware of the facts and reminded of the law, YOUR offence WILL be actionable and I will have no hesitation in bringing such misdemeanor to the attention of the competent authority, The Information Commissioner's Office.

Love and kisses.


EDIT your posts to only refer to 'the driver.' This is CRUCIAL.


--------------------
Cabbyman 11 PPCs 0
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Millter
post Thu, 18 Apr 2019 - 14:04
Post #6


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 18 Apr 2019
Member No.: 103,480



Thank you all and posts now edited.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Millter
post Thu, 18 Apr 2019 - 15:34
Post #7


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 18 Apr 2019
Member No.: 103,480



Another question - if the date in question is 16 days (not working days but calendar days) before the date at the top of actual penalty notice does this contravene something?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ManxRed
post Thu, 18 Apr 2019 - 15:40
Post #8


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 9,985
Joined: 20 Aug 2008
Member No.: 21,992



No, that is only relevant if they are using PoFA to hold the Keeper liable.

As per point no. 3 in the letter that cabbyman suggested, it's not relevant here.


--------------------
Sometimes I use big words I don't understand in an effort to make myself sound more photosynthesis.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Millter
post Thu, 18 Apr 2019 - 15:43
Post #9


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 18 Apr 2019
Member No.: 103,480



Thank you - ok have re-read

This post has been edited by Millter: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 - 15:45
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gary Bloke
post Thu, 18 Apr 2019 - 17:17
Post #10


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 488
Joined: 21 Aug 2016
Member No.: 86,563



All of the POFA applies except for Schedule 4.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HappyHarry
post Thu, 18 Apr 2019 - 18:03
Post #11


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 162
Joined: 14 Dec 2018
From: Sussex
Member No.: 101,446



If you’re ever suffering from insomnia, read my Redhill saga. Click on the downward arrow by my name, then click my topics. There’s only the one, but its attracted 7,700 views! Best of luck, remember “act very slooooowly” with byelaw tickets.


--------------------
“Nobody leaves their house because they want to go and do some parking; parking is simply a means to an end, and it should be as easy as possible.” Rishi Sunak, MP
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Millter
post Thu, 18 Jul 2019 - 12:31
Post #12


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 18 Apr 2019
Member No.: 103,480



Hello all, an update on the saga. AS Appeals Service has rejected the appeal, as predicted. Who would be written to next with "questions for clarification" - Saba, ZZPS or AS Appeals?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nosferatu1001
post Thu, 18 Jul 2019 - 12:57
Post #13


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 28,687
Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Member No.: 15,642



Saba.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Millter
post Thu, 18 Jul 2019 - 13:24
Post #14


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 18 Apr 2019
Member No.: 103,480



Thank you nosferatu. And if a letter from zzps is received, the reply is that they have forwarded a number of questions to Saba? Or no need to reply.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gary Bloke
post Thu, 18 Jul 2019 - 15:35
Post #15


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 488
Joined: 21 Aug 2016
Member No.: 86,563



You can ignore all letters unless they are actually taking you to court.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 16:03
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here