Freeman solisitorwanted |
Freeman solisitorwanted |
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 00:54
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 4 Feb 2020 Member No.: 107,722 |
Hi
Any advice on this please I am looking for a freeman solicitor; and that is someone who represents someone in court in the capacity of a freeman. And what I mean by a freeman is a human being (and not a person) that lawfully (and not legally) dose not stand under any statute/ act of parliament/ admiral law/ law of the sea because they choice as Sovereign beings by there constitutional rights (magna carta treaty for the state of England and all other crown governed country) not to represent the corporative title they where given (there name or Mr/Mrs in upper case letters) when they where born in the form of a birth certificate Have a look at this video, it is rayman Sinclair and someone ells with a hidden camera in court representing someone in count in the above means. I have looked Raymond Sinclair up on the net and he seams to have vanished off of the face of the earth (hope he is alright!) https://youtu.be/zfwDjbZgLqI |
|
|
Advertisement |
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 00:54
Post
#
|
Advertise here! |
|
|
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 01:16
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 13,572 Joined: 28 Mar 2010 Member No.: 36,528 |
We are not at all keen on that nonsense here, and if you get to court you will find they are not either.
-------------------- |
|
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 01:18
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 4 Feb 2020 Member No.: 107,722 |
|
|
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 05:51
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 951 Joined: 17 Aug 2010 Member No.: 39,849 |
We are not at all keen on that nonsense here, and if you get to court you will find they are not either. noncnece really! so whos side are you on then? Presumably the side of the real world and not some far fetched fantasy planet? |
|
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 06:58
Post
#5
|
||||
Webmaster Group: Root Admin Posts: 8,205 Joined: 30 Mar 2003 From: Wokingham, UK Member No.: 2 |
I am looking for a freeman solicitor; Another Freeman "victory" video, I see, with the usual outcome. Are you really sure you want a solicitor skilled in leading you to defeat? That's assuming that the SRA even allow real solicitors to persist in employing fanciful woo-woo arguments like those. -------------------- Regards,
Fredd __________________________________________________________________________
|
|||
|
||||
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 08:34
Post
#6
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 1,214 Joined: 24 Mar 2013 From: Scotland Member No.: 60,732 |
Hi Any advice on this please I am looking for a freeman solicitor; and that is someone who represents someone in court in the capacity of a freeman. And what I mean by a freeman is a human being (and not a person) that lawfully (and not legally) dose not stand under any statute/ act of parliament/ admiral law/ law of the sea because they choice as Sovereign beings by there constitutional rights (magna carta treaty for the state of England and all other crown governed country) not to represent the corporative title they where given (there name or Mr/Mrs in upper case letters) when they where born in the form of a birth certificate Have a look at this video, it is rayman Sinclair and someone ells with a hidden camera in court representing someone in count in the above means. I have looked Raymond Sinclair up on the net and he seams to have vanished off of the face of the earth (hope he is alright!) https://youtu.be/zfwDjbZgLqI I presume by Freeman you don't mean Nick Freeman? |
|
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 08:34
Post
#7
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 38,006 Joined: 3 Dec 2010 Member No.: 42,618 |
We are not at all keen on that nonsense here, and if you get to court you will find they are not either. noncnece really! so whos side are you on then? See the footer at the end of this message. -------------------- If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
|
|
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 09:32
Post
#8
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 9,985 Joined: 20 Aug 2008 Member No.: 21,992 |
Popcorn ordered.
I have looked Raymond Sinclair up on the net and he seams to have vanished off of the face of the earth (hope he is alright!) Maybe he got too near the edge and fell off. -------------------- Sometimes I use big words I don't understand in an effort to make myself sound more photosynthesis.
|
|
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 09:37
Post
#9
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 33,610 Joined: 2 Apr 2008 From: Not in the UK Member No.: 18,483 |
Hi Any advice on this please I am looking for a freeman solicitor; and that is someone who represents someone in court in the capacity of a freeman. And what I mean by a freeman is a human being (and not a person) that lawfully (and not legally) dose not stand under any statute/ act of parliament/ admiral law/ law of the sea because they choice as Sovereign beings by there constitutional rights (magna carta treaty for the state of England and all other crown governed country) not to represent the corporative title they where given (there name or Mr/Mrs in upper case letters) when they where born in the form of a birth certificate Have a look at this video, it is rayman Sinclair and someone ells with a hidden camera in court representing someone in count in the above means. I have looked Raymond Sinclair up on the net and he seams to have vanished off of the face of the earth (hope he is alright!) https://youtu.be/zfwDjbZgLqI Assuming you’re not a troll... there is no such thing as a “freeman solicitor”. No actual solicitor would peddle such unadulterated claptrap as that espoused by the freeman movement. If you find a “lawyer” willing to do so, they’re not a real (i.e. authorised and regulated) lawyer. -------------------- Moderator
Any comments made do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon. No lawyer/client relationship should be assumed nor should any duty of care be owed. |
|
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 10:55
Post
#10
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 3,124 Joined: 8 Feb 2013 Member No.: 59,842 |
Keep it coming @OP - makes a nice break from reading yet another 'Help, help, Yelp, I've got a parking ticket'!
|
|
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 13:54
Post
#11
|
|
New Member Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 28 Oct 2019 Member No.: 106,364 |
Some further info about Raymond St.Clair, not Sinclair:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forum...ad.php?t=203625 https://www.realscam.com/f11/ray-st-clair-real-story-49/ https://www.scam.com/showthread.php?116658-...ighlight=Beaver http://www.faketitles.com/html/the_eager_beaver.html http://www.baronage.co.uk/bphtm-03/beaver-2.html |
|
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 18:01
Post
#12
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 3,140 Joined: 19 Jun 2004 From: Surrey Member No.: 1,326 |
Hi Any advice on this please I am looking for a freeman solicitor; and that is someone who represents someone in court in the capacity of a freeman. And what I mean by a freeman is a human being (and not a person) that lawfully (and not legally) dose not stand under any statute/ act of parliament/ admiral law/ law of the sea because they choice as Sovereign beings by there constitutional rights (magna carta treaty for the state of England and all other crown governed country) not to represent the corporative title they where given (there name or Mr/Mrs in upper case letters) when they where born in the form of a birth certificate Have a look at this video, it is rayman Sinclair and someone ells with a hidden camera in court representing someone in count in the above means. I have looked Raymond Sinclair up on the net and he seams to have vanished off of the face of the earth (hope he is alright!) https://youtu.be/zfwDjbZgLqI I presume by Freeman you don't mean Nick Freeman? That's what I first thought, then I realised it was another amusing FOTL thread. |
|
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 19:23
Post
#13
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 38,006 Joined: 3 Dec 2010 Member No.: 42,618 |
Assuming you’re not a troll... there is no such thing as a “freeman solicitor”. No actual solicitor would peddle such unadulterated claptrap as that espoused by the freeman movement. If you find a “lawyer” willing to do so, they’re not a real (i.e. authorised and regulated) lawyer. You're forgetting that in -------------------- If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
|
|
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 20:23
Post
#14
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 4 Feb 2020 Member No.: 107,722 |
Presumably the side of the real world and not some far fetched fantasy planet? This is not some fantasy world; this is my constitutional rights I would surgest that you do some research on the matter before passing judgment BTW my user name was not set correctly when I registered. I was ask for 2 names and the first was: worthless little eater and the second was: of prison planet So one would presume the first one should be displayed I am looking for a freeman solicitor; Another Freeman "victory" video, I see, with the usual outcome. Are you really sure you want a solicitor skilled in leading you to defeat? That's assuming that the SRA even allow real solicitors to persist in employing fanciful woo-woo arguments like those. What do you think they staged the hole video or something? I presume by Freeman you don't mean Nick Freeman? Absolutely not sir! I happen to live in Manchester and from my own experience the man is a bloody hypocrite who is only doing it for the money We are not at all keen on that nonsense here, and if you get to court you will find they are not either. noncnece really! so whos side are you on then? See the footer at the end of this message. It truly amazes me how one thing starts off being in favor of our human rights (example this forum and money saving expert) but it turns out its quite the opposite in reality The term lawful rebellion springs to mind! Assuming you’re not a troll... there is no such thing as a “freeman solicitor”. No actual solicitor would peddle such unadulterated claptrap as that espoused by the freeman movement. If you find a “lawyer” willing to do so, they’re not a real (i.e. authorised and regulated) lawyer. I am a troll sir! infact I am that much of a troll I went to the extent of making the whole bloody video up myself using Adobe Premiere Elements Some further info about Raymond St.Clair, not Sinclair: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forum...ad.php?t=203625 https://www.realscam.com/f11/ray-st-clair-real-story-49/ https://www.scam.com/showthread.php?116658-...ighlight=Beaver http://www.faketitles.com/html/the_eager_beaver.html http://www.baronage.co.uk/bphtm-03/beaver-2.html And thank you; thank you for your constructive input Assuming you’re not a troll... there is no such thing as a “freeman solicitor”. No actual solicitor would peddle such unadulterated claptrap as that espoused by the freeman movement. If you find a “lawyer” willing to do so, they’re not a real (i.e. authorised and regulated) lawyer. You're forgetting that in But reading the above link this human being has played the part of many different corporative enteritis of different titles and names |
|
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 21:10
Post
#15
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 33,610 Joined: 2 Apr 2008 From: Not in the UK Member No.: 18,483 |
Have you taken your pills today?
-------------------- Moderator
Any comments made do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon. No lawyer/client relationship should be assumed nor should any duty of care be owed. |
|
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 21:44
Post
#16
|
||||
Webmaster Group: Root Admin Posts: 8,205 Joined: 30 Mar 2003 From: Wokingham, UK Member No.: 2 |
BTW my user name was not set correctly when I registered. I was ask for 2 names and the first was: worthless little eater and the second was: of prison planet So one would presume the first one should be displayed The first username was described in the registration form as your "login username". That's the username you use to login with. The second username was described in the registration form as your "display username". That's the username that's displayed to people when you post. So your username was in fact set correctly, it's rather that you didn't read properly what the two names were for. I am looking for a freeman solicitor; Another Freeman "victory" video, I see, with the usual outcome. Are you really sure you want a solicitor skilled in leading you to defeat? That's assuming that the SRA even allow real solicitors to persist in employing fanciful woo-woo arguments like those. What do you think they staged the hole video or something? No, I don't think they're bright enough to stage something like that. If you watch the whole video then right at the end it transpires that actually a liability order was made. In secret, by the corrupt court, obviously - but nevertheless the case was a loss, not a victory. -------------------- Regards,
Fredd __________________________________________________________________________
|
|||
|
||||
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 22:39
Post
#17
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 7,235 Joined: 5 Jan 2007 From: England Member No.: 9,919 |
I must defend the OP here, i know exactly who it is... A list celeb Jack Nicholson. What was that film called again? ...
One flew over ... This post has been edited by mickR: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 23:10 |
|
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 23:19
Post
#18
|
|
Member Group: Life Member Posts: 24,213 Joined: 9 Sep 2004 From: Reading Member No.: 1,624 |
This is not some fantasy world; this is my constitutional rights I would surgest that you do some research on the matter before passing judgment You are entitled to your opinion that you are not living in some fantasy world. You are delusional, but entitled to be so. Presumably on your planet (which presumably is known as "on the land") "this is my constitutional rights" is grammatically correct, and "surgest" is a real world. Here on planet Earth, it merely gives the uninitiated a guide to how much credence to give to your ramblings. As for research, at least two of the posters participating in this train wreck of a thread have qualifying law degrees - however, as with every (real) lawyer and judge in the land, we were taught a version of constitutional law which does not accept yours. Regardless of whether or not you are right (and you are not), no court in the land (or any other real land) will ever uphold the FMOTL principles. Feel free to be find yourself held in contempt by explaining to the judge(s) that they are corrupt when they rule against you. I don't know if you are aware, but the basis of the FMOTL argument is a US judgment which held that some minor administrative technicality did not nullify the democratically elected state legislature and all the legislation they passed. Somehow, the FMOTL brigade decided that for their own purposes, a majority democratically electing a legislature validating the legislation equated to individuals being able to decline legislation as it is not law. So, did you simply not research the bollox you are spouting, or are you too retarded to understand it? -------------------- Andy
Some people think that I make them feel stupid. To be fair, they deserve most of the credit. |
|
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 - 23:23
Post
#19
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 1,397 Joined: 12 Jun 2008 From: West Sussex Member No.: 20,304 |
"Constitutional rights"? I thought this pertained to the UK. Do we suddenly have a constitution? Have I missed something?
|
|
|
Wed, 5 Feb 2020 - 00:16
Post
#20
|
|
New Member Group: Closed Posts: 1 Joined: 5 Feb 2020 Member No.: 107,741 |
BTW my user name was not set correctly when I registered. I was ask for 2 names and the first was: worthless little eater and the second was: of prison planet So one would presume the first one should be displayed The first username was described in the registration form as your "login username". That's the username you use to login with. The second username was described in the registration form as your "display username". That's the username that's displayed to people when you post. So your username was in fact set correctly, it's rather that you didn't read properly what the two names were for. Is this looking better sir? No, I don't think they're bright enough to stage something like that. If you watch the whole video then right at the end it transpires that actually a liability order was made. In secret, by the corrupt court, obviously - but nevertheless the case was a loss, not a victory. No it didint! As for research, at least two of the posters participating in this train wreck of a thread have qualifying law degrees - so they are experts with the final word and must be trusted and obeyed! Feel free to be find yourself held in contempt by explaining to the judge(s) that they are corrupt when they rule against you. please watch the video for further clarification https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_clpkjBoBg "Constitutional rights"? I thought this pertained to the UK. Do we suddenly have a constitution? Have I missed something? its called the magna carta treaty 1215/ amended 1217 This post has been edited by worthles little eater: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 - 00:17 |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 22:24 |