PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

PCN from council
John Bravo
post Fri, 9 Sep 2016 - 21:48
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 323
Joined: 5 Dec 2015
From: London
Member No.: 81,055



Hi All,
I hope you are well.
Some time ago I have received a PCN. I have done online representation to it. They have sent a letter asking to provide an invoice of car repair as a proof or accept the fine and pay £65 within 14 days.
After that I have scanned, uploaded and submitted a scanned document via their online system. Used exactly the same PCN number and car reg number to login to online appeal facility.
After 2 weeks I have received a Notice To Owner instead asking to pay £130, so no Notice of Rejection or Acceptance, so far.
What should I do now. I can only do a formal representation at the moment. I assume that the previous online representation was kind of informal.

I have these options on the list:
A - The alleged Contravention did not occur
B I was not the owner of the vehicle at the time of contravention
- I have sold the vehicle before that date
- I had brought the vehicle after that date
- I have never owned that vehicle
C - The vehicle was taken without my consent
D - We are a hire firm and have supplied details
E - The Penalty Charge exceeds the relevant amount
F - There has been a procedural impropriety by the Enforcement Authority
G - The traffic order contravened is invalid
H - The Notice should not have been served because the Penalty Charge had already been paid
I - Other

I was going to go for Other, but not sure how they treat Other in comparison to variant F - procedural impropriety.
Please advise.
Thank you


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
9 Pages V  « < 7 8 9  
Start new topic
Replies (160 - 174)
Advertisement
post Fri, 9 Sep 2016 - 21:48
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
John U.K.
post Thu, 17 May 2018 - 19:24
Post #161


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,308
Joined: 9 May 2014
Member No.: 70,515



QUOTE
So, show us the original PCN.


John said he long ago mislaid original PCN (post #158)

Hence my query - IF the council maintain there is a true copy in the evidence pack .. if the Adj takes the Council's evidence as submitted at face value as a triue copy... then ergo there was info missing on the original.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hcandersen
post Thu, 17 May 2018 - 19:56
Post #162


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 35,060
Joined: 2 Aug 2008
From: Woking
Member No.: 21,551



A certified true copy of the PCN IS a requirement in that without it no adj could satisfy themselves that one was served, after which the whole house of cards falls.

Whether this is a 'legal' requirement is beside the point, in the absence of a true copy substantially correct in all detail the adj would allow an appeal - and as we know even if these grounds had not been raised by the appellant.

As the government made clear in their briefing paper which accompanied the TM Bill, decriminalisation was not to be used to water-down the standard of evidence.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Bravo
post Thu, 17 May 2018 - 20:12
Post #163


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 323
Joined: 5 Dec 2015
From: London
Member No.: 81,055



The front page of the PCN apart from PCN number and dates does not state any authority. Only on the reverse I can read in section HOW TO PAY, HOW TO CHALLENGE the address details of the TH council.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cp8759
post Fri, 18 May 2018 - 13:58
Post #164


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 38,006
Joined: 3 Dec 2010
Member No.: 42,618



Then you can reasonably contend the PCN does not satisfy the requirements of paragraph 1b of the schedule to the general regs: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/3483/schedule/made


--------------------
If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Bravo
post Sun, 20 May 2018 - 23:54
Post #165


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 323
Joined: 5 Dec 2015
From: London
Member No.: 81,055



QUOTE (cp8759 @ Fri, 18 May 2018 - 13:58) *
Then you can reasonably contend the PCN does not satisfy the requirements of paragraph 1b of the schedule to the general regs: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/3483/schedule/made

Should write all this down and let them decide "offline" or ask for a hearing "online"?
I have 2 days to send a response, evidences.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cp8759
post Mon, 21 May 2018 - 13:32
Post #166


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 38,006
Joined: 3 Dec 2010
Member No.: 42,618



Hearings are in person, so you'd have to go to the tribunal. Personally I would chose to attend a hearing but you have to consider whether this would mean taking time off work.


--------------------
If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Bravo
post Mon, 21 May 2018 - 14:13
Post #167


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 323
Joined: 5 Dec 2015
From: London
Member No.: 81,055



QUOTE (cp8759 @ Mon, 21 May 2018 - 13:32) *
Hearings are in person, so you'd have to go to the tribunal. Personally I would chose to attend a hearing but you have to consider whether this would mean taking time off work.

ok, it is not a problem for me to go there, from the last time I remember they are based in Islington, Angel station, London.
I think including commute it should not take longer than 1.5-2h


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John U.K.
post Mon, 21 May 2018 - 14:21
Post #168


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,308
Joined: 9 May 2014
Member No.: 70,515



QUOTE
rom the last time I remember they are based in Islington, Angel station, London.


Now moved to Furnival Street. See

https://www.londontribunals.gov.uk/eat
and
https://www.londontribunals.gov.uk/about/co...-hearing-centre
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Bravo
post Mon, 21 May 2018 - 17:14
Post #169


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 323
Joined: 5 Dec 2015
From: London
Member No.: 81,055



QUOTE (John U.K. @ Mon, 21 May 2018 - 14:21) *
QUOTE
rom the last time I remember they are based in Islington, Angel station, London.


Now moved to Furnival Street. See

https://www.londontribunals.gov.uk/eat
and
https://www.londontribunals.gov.uk/about/co...-hearing-centre


Oh, great, it looks even closer to me.
Do I have to write to them to ask for a hearing or give them a call?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John U.K.
post Mon, 21 May 2018 - 18:43
Post #170


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,308
Joined: 9 May 2014
Member No.: 70,515



QUOTE
Should write all this down and let them decide "offline" or ask for a hearing "online"?
I have 2 days to send a response, evidences.



What is the source of this deadline? The letter in Post #136 which says 27th.May?

Must admit I am a bit confused sad.gif

I think you need to ring LT in morning and ask whether a personal hearing is possible in your particular circumstances.

Hopefully the experts here will chip in with some advice for you.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Bravo
post Tue, 22 May 2018 - 13:57
Post #171


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 323
Joined: 5 Dec 2015
From: London
Member No.: 81,055



QUOTE (John U.K. @ Mon, 21 May 2018 - 18:43) *
QUOTE
Should write all this down and let them decide "offline" or ask for a hearing "online"?
I have 2 days to send a response, evidences.



What is the source of this deadline? The letter in Post #136 which says 27th.May?

Must admit I am a bit confused sad.gif

I think you need to ring LT in morning and ask whether a personal hearing is possible in your particular circumstances.

Hopefully the experts here will chip in with some advice for you.

yes, the deadline is 27th

I think I give them a ring


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Bravo
post Tue, 22 May 2018 - 15:45
Post #172


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 323
Joined: 5 Dec 2015
From: London
Member No.: 81,055



ok, so I have asked for a hearing which will be on 7th of June at 2:30pm, so I can start preparing my line of defence.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Bravo
post Thu, 7 Jun 2018 - 20:37
Post #173


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 323
Joined: 5 Dec 2015
From: London
Member No.: 81,055



Ok, so I have attended the hearing and the adjudicator has allowed for appeal.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
disgrunt
post Thu, 7 Jun 2018 - 20:41
Post #174


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 634
Joined: 8 Dec 2012
Member No.: 58,778



Well done

Do you have further details for us?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Bravo
post Mon, 11 Jun 2018 - 22:24
Post #175


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 323
Joined: 5 Dec 2015
From: London
Member No.: 81,055



Basically I have said that what council is claiming as dropped kerb for a pedestrian crossing is not true. I have stated that the dropped kerb is only on one side of the street. This was enough to convince the adjudicator.
We have not even get to the stage re inaccurate evidence (PCN without the authority name) supplied by the council in evidence pack.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

9 Pages V  « < 7 8 9
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 17:03
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here