pcn outside 56 reply time, Threads merged x4 |
pcn outside 56 reply time, Threads merged x4 |
Tue, 7 May 2019 - 20:17
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 77 Joined: 4 Apr 2018 From: GB Member No.: 97,365 |
i inadvertantly parked in a disabled bay, its is about 4 car spaces long and it is situated at the end of a road, i had driven pass and reversed into the road and parking bay, i didnt notice the markings and i have also noted that there is one sign at the opposite end of the bay, do i have any grounds to appeal it ?, if not i will just suck it. pictures below that i took.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/lwnkxyreq6ibw4j/I...0349_0.jpg?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/dblhcg66qlha16k/I...0411_6.jpg?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/1e8u1l85yui04oi/I...0406_5.jpg?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/7owdjtjg4nn3ite/I...0356_0.jpg?dl=0 -------------------- |
|
|
Advertisement |
Tue, 7 May 2019 - 20:17
Post
#
|
Advertise here! |
|
|
|
Thu, 21 Nov 2019 - 22:37
Post
#41
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 77 Joined: 4 Apr 2018 From: GB Member No.: 97,365 |
I'm sure its been asked before, but you own the car or is it leased? is the v5c correct showing the same address as the NTO ? i own the car and the address is the same on both -------------------- |
|
|
Thu, 21 Nov 2019 - 22:55
Post
#42
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 26,655 Joined: 6 Nov 2014 Member No.: 74,048 |
You have won, but lets' tweak their nose a bit. If they reject your representations then a cost order against them is a strong possibility. I will have a bit of fun drafting tomorrow unless HCA wants in, then I will gladly defer
-------------------- All advice is given freely. It is given without guarantee and responsibility for its use rests with the user
|
|
|
Fri, 22 Nov 2019 - 18:22
Post
#43
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 77 Joined: 4 Apr 2018 From: GB Member No.: 97,365 |
You have won, but lets' tweak their nose a bit. If they reject your representations then a cost order against them is a strong possibility. I will have a bit of fun drafting tomorrow unless HCA wants in, then I will gladly defer Thank you !, tweaking the nose of the council/3rd Reich and getting paid for it ?. So does this now go to adjudicator, do i have to attend New Zealand house ? -------------------- |
|
|
Fri, 22 Nov 2019 - 19:19
Post
#44
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 26,655 Joined: 6 Nov 2014 Member No.: 74,048 |
You have won, but lets' tweak their nose a bit. If they reject your representations then a cost order against them is a strong possibility. I will have a bit of fun drafting tomorrow unless HCA wants in, then I will gladly defer Thank you !, tweaking the nose of the council/3rd Reich and getting paid for it ?. So does this now go to adjudicator, do i have to attend New Zealand house ? Its not New Zealand house but no not adjudication yet. First formal representations to the council where we will point out all the rubbish in the responses to the informal challenges then the absurdity of despite you warning them they still served the NTO out of time -------------------- All advice is given freely. It is given without guarantee and responsibility for its use rests with the user
|
|
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2019 - 17:53
Post
#45
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 77 Joined: 4 Apr 2018 From: GB Member No.: 97,365 |
You have won, but lets' tweak their nose a bit. If they reject your representations then a cost order against them is a strong possibility. I will have a bit of fun drafting tomorrow unless HCA wants in, then I will gladly defer Thank you !, tweaking the nose of the council/3rd Reich and getting paid for it ?. So does this now go to adjudicator, do i have to attend New Zealand house ? Its not New Zealand house but no not adjudication yet. First formal representations to the council where we will point out all the rubbish in the responses to the informal challenges then the absurdity of despite you warning them they still served the NTO out of time Ok, so what am i doing now ? -------------------- |
|
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2019 - 12:35
Post
#46
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 26,655 Joined: 6 Nov 2014 Member No.: 74,048 |
Making representation against the NTO. I will re read the thread and draft for you over the weekend
-------------------- All advice is given freely. It is given without guarantee and responsibility for its use rests with the user
|
|
|
Mon, 2 Dec 2019 - 22:16
Post
#47
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 77 Joined: 4 Apr 2018 From: GB Member No.: 97,365 |
Making representation against the NTO. I will re read the thread and draft for you over the weekend I dont want to be a pest, i have a limited ammount of time to do this and appreciate your help but i dont want bailiffs turning up at my door -------------------- |
|
|
Tue, 3 Dec 2019 - 10:27
Post
#48
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 26,655 Joined: 6 Nov 2014 Member No.: 74,048 |
Making representation against the NTO. I will re read the thread and draft for you over the weekend I dont want to be a pest, i have a limited ammount of time to do this and appreciate your help but i dont want bailiffs turning up at my door Don't worry about being a pest. You have until the 17th of December to make representations. I will not let you down and will get on the case this week ( family being demanding of my time is slowing me up) I'm free from Wednesday -------------------- All advice is given freely. It is given without guarantee and responsibility for its use rests with the user
|
|
|
Tue, 3 Dec 2019 - 11:54
Post
#49
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 35,051 Joined: 2 Aug 2008 From: Woking Member No.: 21,551 |
Grounds:
Penalty exceeds the amount applicable ....circumstances of the case. Procedural impropriety In narrative box: I refer you to this NTO which is dated 18 November 2019 and relates to a PCN served on 7 May 2019 which, for the purposes of the regulations, is the 'relevant date'. This is an elapsed period of over 6 months. I also refer you to regulation 20 of the General Regulations which I have set out in detail below for your benefit: Time limit for service of a notice to owner 20.—(1) A notice to owner may not be served after the expiry of the period of 6 months beginning with the relevant date. (2) The relevant date— (a)in a case where a notice to owner has been cancelled under regulation 23(5)© of these Regulations, is the date on which the district judge serves notice in accordance with regulation 23(5)(d); (b)in case where a notice to owner has been cancelled under regulation 5 of the Representations and Appeals Regulations, is the date of such cancellation; ©in a case where payment of the penalty charge was made, or had purportedly been made, before the expiry of the period mentioned in paragraph (1) but the payment or purported payment had been cancelled or withdrawn, is the date on which the enforcement authority is notified that the payment or purported payment has been cancelled or withdrawn; (d)in any other case, is the date on which the relevant penalty charge notice was served under regulation 9. The regulations make it absolutely clear that the authority are prohibited from serving a NTO beyond 6 months and therefore they have acted ultra vires. This NTO is therefore void, has no legal effect and must be cancelled. I feel that I must express my concern that the authority's internal processes have failed in this way because it should not lie with an owner to instruct the council on their powers in this matter given the clarity of the absolutely strict prohibition under the regulations. |
|
|
Tue, 3 Dec 2019 - 16:10
Post
#50
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 77 Joined: 4 Apr 2018 From: GB Member No.: 97,365 |
Grounds: Penalty exceeds the amount applicable ....circumstances of the case. Procedural impropriety In narrative box: I refer you to this NTO which is dated 18 November 2019 and relates to a PCN served on 7 May 2019 which, for the purposes of the regulations, is the 'relevant date'. This is an elapsed period of over 6 months. I also refer you to regulation 20 of the General Regulations which I have set out in detail below for your benefit: Time limit for service of a notice to owner 20.—(1) A notice to owner may not be served after the expiry of the period of 6 months beginning with the relevant date. (2) The relevant date— (a)in a case where a notice to owner has been cancelled under regulation 23(5)© of these Regulations, is the date on which the district judge serves notice in accordance with regulation 23(5)(d); (b)in case where a notice to owner has been cancelled under regulation 5 of the Representations and Appeals Regulations, is the date of such cancellation; ©in a case where payment of the penalty charge was made, or had purportedly been made, before the expiry of the period mentioned in paragraph (1) but the payment or purported payment had been cancelled or withdrawn, is the date on which the enforcement authority is notified that the payment or purported payment has been cancelled or withdrawn; (d)in any other case, is the date on which the relevant penalty charge notice was served under regulation 9. The regulations make it absolutely clear that the authority are prohibited from serving a NTO beyond 6 months and therefore they have acted ultra vires. This NTO is therefore void, has no legal effect and must be cancelled. I feel that I must express my concern that the authority's internal processes have failed in this way because it should not lie with an owner to instruct the council on their powers in this matter given the clarity of the absolutely strict prohibition under the regulations. Very well said. can i apply for costs ? i know this forum is free but i am very grateful for it and would like to donate half of anything i got to the running of it -------------------- |
|
|
Tue, 3 Dec 2019 - 20:06
Post
#51
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 26,655 Joined: 6 Nov 2014 Member No.: 74,048 |
Grounds: Penalty exceeds the amount applicable ....circumstances of the case. Procedural impropriety In narrative box: I refer you to this NTO which is dated 18 November 2019 and relates to a PCN served on 7 May 2019 which, for the purposes of the regulations, is the 'relevant date'. This is an elapsed period of over 6 months. I also refer you to regulation 20 of the General Regulations which I have set out in detail below for your benefit: Time limit for service of a notice to owner 20.—(1) A notice to owner may not be served after the expiry of the period of 6 months beginning with the relevant date. (2) The relevant date— (a)in a case where a notice to owner has been cancelled under regulation 23(5)© of these Regulations, is the date on which the district judge serves notice in accordance with regulation 23(5)(d); (b)in case where a notice to owner has been cancelled under regulation 5 of the Representations and Appeals Regulations, is the date of such cancellation; ©in a case where payment of the penalty charge was made, or had purportedly been made, before the expiry of the period mentioned in paragraph (1) but the payment or purported payment had been cancelled or withdrawn, is the date on which the enforcement authority is notified that the payment or purported payment has been cancelled or withdrawn; (d)in any other case, is the date on which the relevant penalty charge notice was served under regulation 9. The regulations make it absolutely clear that the authority are prohibited from serving a NTO beyond 6 months and therefore they have acted ultra vires. This NTO is therefore void, has no legal effect and must be cancelled. I feel that I must express my concern that the authority's internal processes have failed in this way because it should not lie with an owner to instruct the council on their powers in this matter given the clarity of the absolutely strict prohibition under the regulations. Very well said. can i apply for costs ? i know this forum is free but i am very grateful for it and would like to donate half of anything i got to the running of it I agree with what HCA has said but you could not apply for costs unless they were silly enough to reject your representations at which stage (adjudication) you could -------------------- All advice is given freely. It is given without guarantee and responsibility for its use rests with the user
|
|
|
Tue, 10 Mar 2020 - 10:41
Post
#52
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 77 Joined: 4 Apr 2018 From: GB Member No.: 97,365 |
Its been a long while for them to do it, they cancelled the ticket at the 11th hour because the notice to owner wast served in time. it angers me that knowing full well they dont have a leg to stand on they dont cancel it in the first instance. Thanks to everyone that input into this, i wouldn't have done it without your guidance
-------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 10:25 |