PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

scam ppc, law in their favour
nailbag
post Thu, 30 May 2019 - 21:07
Post #1


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 27 Feb 2019
Member No.: 102,642



How is it that these ppc abuse practice court protocols, abuse sending DQ to the defendant, have copied and pasted sparse particulars of claim,refuse to comply with SAR, have non-watertight contracts with landowners, and yet district judges will hear the case in a county court. The whole system is wrong because if the defendant falters at any point the claimant wins! Has anybody reversed the situation and claimed against a PPC that has discontinued the claim and behaved unreasonably (or paid a previous invoice for multiple breaches and has either a judgement in the defendants favour or a discontinuance). In which case start an MCOL claim and let the PPC provide an AOS, defence, witness statement, exhibits etc?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 2)
Advertisement
post Thu, 30 May 2019 - 21:07
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
andy_foster
post Thu, 30 May 2019 - 22:28
Post #2


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 24,213
Joined: 9 Sep 2004
From: Reading
Member No.: 1,624



Yes


--------------------
Andy

Some people think that I make them feel stupid. To be fair, they deserve most of the credit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cp8759
post Fri, 31 May 2019 - 21:09
Post #3


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 38,006
Joined: 3 Dec 2010
Member No.: 42,618



QUOTE (nailbag @ Thu, 30 May 2019 - 22:07) *
How is it that these ppc abuse practice court protocols, abuse sending DQ to the defendant, have copied and pasted sparse particulars of claim,refuse to comply with SAR, have non-watertight contracts with landowners, and yet district judges will hear the case in a county court. The whole system is wrong because if the defendant falters at any point the claimant wins! Has anybody reversed the situation and claimed against a PPC that has discontinued the claim and behaved unreasonably (or paid a previous invoice for multiple breaches and has either a judgement in the defendants favour or a discontinuance). In which case start an MCOL claim and let the PPC provide an AOS, defence, witness statement, exhibits etc?

If you want to claim costs then the case continues for costs purposes only, you don't start a brand new claim. If proceedings have not been started at all, you'd need to issue costs-only proceedings.


--------------------
If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 16:27
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here