PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Final NIP/S172
Pensioner
post Sat, 22 Jul 2017 - 09:21
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 22 Jul 2017
Member No.: 93,141



I have received a very unwelcome NIP/S172 Request. (20% over limit) It is Headed "FINAL REQUEST FOR INFORMATION" There is no mention of reminder or of any previous notices.

The question I have is:

If a previous notice was issued, would returning the present one completed and signed admitting to being the drive at the time of the alleged offence constitute satisfying the S172 requirement fully. Or would it still be possible to resurrect what appears a notice that has not been received.

To clarify, I am not the registered keeper.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Start new topic
Replies (20 - 27)
Advertisement
post Sat, 22 Jul 2017 - 09:21
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Pensioner
post Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 19:18
Post #21


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 22 Jul 2017
Member No.: 93,141



QUOTE (southpaw82 @ Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 19:44) *
QUOTE (Pensioner @ Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 19:21) *
Does anyone know if Greater Manchester use the Single Justice Process or the old Lay Information and Summons?

Still waiting to hear from a NIP that was returned nearly a month ago.

The police no longer have a power to lay an information, so must use a written charge along with a requisition or single justice notice.



So for an allged offence in the last week of February, surely I should have received one or the other by now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jlc
post Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 19:22
Post #22


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 27,456
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
From: With Mickey
Member No.: 49,223



QUOTE (Pensioner @ Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 20:18) *
So for an allged offence in the last week of February, surely I should have received one or the other by now.

Probably, but not quite in the clear yet.


--------------------
RK=Registered Keeper, OP=Original Poster (You!), CoFP=Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty, NtK=Notice to Keeper, NtD=Notice to Driver
PoFA=Protection of Freedoms Act, SAC=Safety Awareness Course, NIP=Notice of Intended Prosecution, ADR=Alternative Dispute Resolution
PPC=Private Parking Company, LBCCC=Letter Before County Court Claim, PII=Personally Identifiable Information

Private Parking - remember, they just want your money and will say almost anything to get it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
southpaw82
post Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 19:44
Post #23


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 27,943
Joined: 2 Apr 2008
From: Not in the UK
Member No.: 18,483



QUOTE (Pensioner @ Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 20:18) *
QUOTE (southpaw82 @ Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 19:44) *
QUOTE (Pensioner @ Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 19:21) *
Does anyone know if Greater Manchester use the Single Justice Process or the old Lay Information and Summons?

Still waiting to hear from a NIP that was returned nearly a month ago.

The police no longer have a power to lay an information, so must use a written charge along with a requisition or single justice notice.



So for an allged offence in the last week of February, surely I should have received one or the other by now.

The written charge and requisition/SJPN have to be issued within six months of the offence. Quite why they would then delay posting them is beyond me.


--------------------


Any comments made do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon. No lawyer/client relationship should be assumed nor should any duty of care be owed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pensioner
post Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 21:50
Post #24


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 22 Jul 2017
Member No.: 93,141



QUOTE (southpaw82 @ Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 20:44) *
QUOTE (Pensioner @ Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 20:18) *
QUOTE (southpaw82 @ Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 19:44) *
QUOTE (Pensioner @ Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 19:21) *
Does anyone know if Greater Manchester use the Single Justice Process or the old Lay Information and Summons?

Still waiting to hear from a NIP that was returned nearly a month ago.

The police no longer have a power to lay an information, so must use a written charge along with a requisition or single justice notice.



So for an allged offence in the last week of February, surely I should have received one or the other by now.

The written charge and requisition/SJPN have to be issued within six months of the offence. Quite why they would then delay posting them is beyond me.

This is what I was thinking.

Unless they have lost the completed NIP.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pensioner
post Thu, 15 Feb 2018 - 22:09
Post #25


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 22 Jul 2017
Member No.: 93,141



Just an update on this.

Its now gone six months since the final date to furnish the driver details.

Still heard nothing so I think this is now hiding under GMP's carpet.

Happy Days and Nil Points.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mrmk
post Sat, 7 Apr 2018 - 02:41
Post #26


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 35
Joined: 6 Apr 2018
Member No.: 97,406



QUOTE (southpaw82 @ Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 20:44) *
QUOTE (Pensioner @ Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 20:18) *
QUOTE (southpaw82 @ Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 19:44) *
QUOTE (Pensioner @ Fri, 8 Sep 2017 - 19:21) *
Does anyone know if Greater Manchester use the Single Justice Process or the old Lay Information and Summons?

Still waiting to hear from a NIP that was returned nearly a month ago.

The police no longer have a power to lay an information, so must use a written charge along with a requisition or single justice notice.



So for an allged offence in the last week of February, surely I should have received one or the other by now.

The written charge and requisition/SJPN have to be issued within six months of the offence. Quite why they would then delay posting them is beyond me.


so if you don't receive the requisition within 6 months of the offence, it can't go ahead?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Rookie
post Sat, 7 Apr 2018 - 06:14
Post #27


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 38,076
Joined: 9 Sep 2003
From: Warwickshire
Member No.: 317



Close, but not quite, it has to be produced within the 6 months and then served.


--------------------
There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!

S172's
Rookies 1-0 Kent

Council PCN's
Rookies 1-0 Warwick
Rookies 1-0 Birmingham

PPC PCN's
Rookies 8-0 PPC's
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
andy_foster
post Sat, 7 Apr 2018 - 22:02
Post #28


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 20,241
Joined: 9 Sep 2004
From: Reading
Member No.: 1,624



They have to be "issued" within 6 months. The law has not yet stated what exactly "issued" means, but when it does it will almost certainly not mean "served".


--------------------
Andy

Millenial (noun): a person who is offended at being told "Suck it up, buttercup"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Monday, 23rd April 2018 - 03:32
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.