PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Received 3 pcn on windscreen UKCPM
Geestar
post Thu, 25 Oct 2018 - 13:09
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 60
Joined: 25 Oct 2018
Member No.: 100,600



Hi there,

The keeper received 3 pcn's around April time this year and wrote representation of them all, which obviously they rejected. The representation the keeper sent was the template from the NEWBIE THREAD.

The keeper has now received Debt recovery plus limited letter wanting £160 for each pcn.

Just wondering should I do anything at this stage?

Before I parked where I did I asked the enforcement officer if I could he said bays 93,94 and 95 is not being controlled by UK cPm and got him to send me the evidence which he did and have attached here.

Any suggestions or help would be much appreciated.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
9 Pages V  « < 7 8 9  
Start new topic
Replies (160 - 166)
Advertisement
post Thu, 25 Oct 2018 - 13:09
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
manur
post Thu, 21 Nov 2019 - 14:43
Post #161


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 330
Joined: 13 Nov 2011
Member No.: 51,050



after reading the e v l, i can say that the RK doesn't even have a drivers license.

QUOTE (Redivi @ Mon, 3 Dec 2018 - 11:31) *
I would tighten it up and focus, working on the principle that anything that is not necessary has potential to be twisted against you or at least used as a distraction :

Dear K Larsson,

Your Ref: - xxxxxxxx, xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx

In your letter dated 27th November 2018 you state that the allegedly false attachment I have provided is outdated and that your company does in fact have a contract to manage the disputed bays 93-95.

There is clearly a conflict between your assertion and the information provided by your Enforcement Officer (name)

Please provide the full name of Mr **** and the correct address to serve a witness summons for his attendance at any hearing
Please also confirm that you will produce the original copies of both contracts in Court - the contract that you state is now in place and one you allege to be superceded.
Mr **** will be asked to confirm our conversation and to explain why there was a disparity between the updated contract as you claim, and his own instructions.

I strongly suggest that you examine your position
If the contract had in fact been superceded and Mr **** was in error, a claim against me must fail for promissory estoppel
If it had not been superceded, you accessed my details at the DVLA without reasonable cause
This is an actionable breach of the General data Protection Regulations and your continuing demands have aggravated your error

I await your response

Yours sincerely,


Companies nearly always refuse to send copies of contracts
They can't refuse to produce them in court and the request for both puts UKCPM to proof that the contract was updated
If it was, it then leaves them unable to deny that the parking notice was a direct result of their own failure to correctly instruct their operative


I didn't get a reply from ukcpm regarding the above can i ask gladrags to present the witness? that way the enforcement officer would be able to identify whether the RK was actually driving or not. He will also confirm that he was not giving pcn's on bays 93,94 and 95. Any help would be much appreciated

This post has been edited by manur: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 - 14:44
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nosferatu1001
post Thu, 21 Nov 2019 - 16:07
Post #162


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 28,687
Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Member No.: 15,642



You can repeat it and note their refusal to answer your reasonable questions.
Again require anname and address for a witness summons
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
manur
post Thu, 21 Nov 2019 - 17:27
Post #163


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 330
Joined: 13 Nov 2011
Member No.: 51,050



I will send this to them now, also the RK is not the driver so they can't rely on e v l can they?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nosferatu1001
post Fri, 22 Nov 2019 - 13:14
Post #164


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 28,687
Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Member No.: 15,642



E v l doesn't demonstrate anything they can rely on anyway, that's been told to you a couple times now.

You state state under oath not driver, and maybe provide other proof of this.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
disgrunt
post Wed, 27 Nov 2019 - 12:06
Post #165


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 634
Joined: 8 Dec 2012
Member No.: 58,778



QUOTE (manur @ Thu, 21 Nov 2019 - 18:27) *
I will send this to them now, also the RK is not the driver so they can't rely on e v l can they?


But didn't your letter to them suggest you were both driver and RK.

"Mr ***** will be asked to confirm our conversation..."

And

"If it had not been superceded you accessed my deatails at the DVLA..."

Also your opening post says "... I parked ..."

This post has been edited by disgrunt: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 - 12:08
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
disgrunt
post Wed, 27 Nov 2019 - 12:23
Post #166


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 634
Joined: 8 Dec 2012
Member No.: 58,778



QUOTE (nosferatu1001 @ Fri, 22 Nov 2019 - 14:14) *
You state state under oath not driver, and maybe provide other proof of this.


The OP will need very robust other proof as this thread and their letters to date suggest they were the driver. (The parasites are very likely to have this thread as evidence to show the judge.)

I suspect the reply "you aver you were not the driver..." is to encourage the OP to either admit they were the driver or perjurer themselves, both of which will impact the OPs credibility in front of the judge.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nosferatu1001
post Wed, 27 Nov 2019 - 13:36
Post #167


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 28,687
Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Member No.: 15,642



Yep, my statement stands however
They need to make it clear if earlier statements were just mistakes, using templates, or something else.
But we're 9 pages in and this STILL isnt clear, despite being asked more than once.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

9 Pages V  « < 7 8 9
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 22:10
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here