PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Speed fine for environmental (air quality) reasons…
inspect
post Mon, 7 Oct 2019 - 15:28
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 14
Joined: 30 Jul 2015
Member No.: 78,618



Hello,

It seems that the Welsh assembly are enforcing speed restrictions due to air quality. Ironically one of the areas is the M4 stretch adjacent the Port Talbot steel works! I may have been caught exceeding the 50mph speed limit along the M4 near the Brynglas tunnels, Newport. My speed would have been approx. 58mph. It was late Sunday night, with very little traffic on the roads, no roadworks, no traffic incident or any other safety reason to slow the traffic. I’ve since found the article below.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-49938080

My questions
1, Is it legal to reduce the motorway speed limit for air quality reasons alone?
2, Can a fine be imposed for breaking a reduced speed limit when no safety or highway code laws have been broken?

I look forward to your replies.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Start new topic
Replies (20 - 31)
Advertisement
post Mon, 7 Oct 2019 - 15:28
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
The Rookie
post Tue, 8 Oct 2019 - 14:15
Post #21


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 56,261
Joined: 9 Sep 2003
From: Warwickshire
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (cp8759 @ Tue, 8 Oct 2019 - 14:56) *
QUOTE (BaggieBoy @ Tue, 8 Oct 2019 - 13:55) *
How would hybrids be treated, since at the time they might be running on electricity or fossil fuel?

I'd say hybrids get treated as IC, the policy direction is all in favour of all electric.

The problem is that 'hybrid' is meaningless, it ranges from a mild hybrid which can't drive on electrical power only through to a electric vehicle with a combustion engine for range extension.
In some use cases those currently have a lower CO2/mile than pure EV's.


--------------------
There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!

S172's
Rookies 1-0 Kent

Council PCN's
Rookies 1-0 Warwick
Rookies 1-0 Birmingham

PPC PCN's
Rookies 10-0 PPC's
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cp8759
post Tue, 8 Oct 2019 - 18:57
Post #22


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 38,007
Joined: 3 Dec 2010
Member No.: 42,618



QUOTE (The Rookie @ Tue, 8 Oct 2019 - 15:15) *
QUOTE (cp8759 @ Tue, 8 Oct 2019 - 14:56) *
QUOTE (BaggieBoy @ Tue, 8 Oct 2019 - 13:55) *
How would hybrids be treated, since at the time they might be running on electricity or fossil fuel?

I'd say hybrids get treated as IC, the policy direction is all in favour of all electric.

The problem is that 'hybrid' is meaningless, it ranges from a mild hybrid which can't drive on electrical power only through to a electric vehicle with a combustion engine for range extension.
In some use cases those currently have a lower CO2/mile than pure EV's.

Doesn't really matter because if you were to only exempt all-electric vehicles from the lower limit, all hybrids would be caught no matter how you described them.


--------------------
If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Rookie
post Wed, 9 Oct 2019 - 08:36
Post #23


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 56,261
Joined: 9 Sep 2003
From: Warwickshire
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (cp8759 @ Tue, 8 Oct 2019 - 19:57) *
Doesn't really matter because if you were to only exempt all-electric vehicles from the lower limit, all hybrids would be caught no matter how you described them.

Well I think the point is that it does matter, as you'll be exempting some cars while not exempting others that are just as clean (and may actually be cleaner).....wrong message!


--------------------
There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!

S172's
Rookies 1-0 Kent

Council PCN's
Rookies 1-0 Warwick
Rookies 1-0 Birmingham

PPC PCN's
Rookies 10-0 PPC's
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cp8759
post Wed, 9 Oct 2019 - 10:33
Post #24


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 38,007
Joined: 3 Dec 2010
Member No.: 42,618



QUOTE (The Rookie @ Wed, 9 Oct 2019 - 09:36) *
QUOTE (cp8759 @ Tue, 8 Oct 2019 - 19:57) *
Doesn't really matter because if you were to only exempt all-electric vehicles from the lower limit, all hybrids would be caught no matter how you described them.

Well I think the point is that it does matter, as you'll be exempting some cars while not exempting others that are just as clean (and may actually be cleaner).....wrong message!

Well we already do that, as all-electric vehicles already get more favourable tax treatment than hybrids.

This post has been edited by cp8759: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 - 10:33


--------------------
If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Rookie
post Wed, 9 Oct 2019 - 20:38
Post #25


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 56,261
Joined: 9 Sep 2003
From: Warwickshire
Member No.: 317



Vehicles are taxed on results, until recently Plug in Hybrids did indeed get the same perks as EVs, but not other hybrids. So not a good simili.


--------------------
There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!

S172's
Rookies 1-0 Kent

Council PCN's
Rookies 1-0 Warwick
Rookies 1-0 Birmingham

PPC PCN's
Rookies 10-0 PPC's
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fredd
post Wed, 9 Oct 2019 - 20:49
Post #26


Webmaster
Group Icon

Group: Root Admin
Posts: 8,205
Joined: 30 Mar 2003
From: Wokingham, UK
Member No.: 2



And now they don't. I don't see what the problem is, perfection isn't a requirement for devising policies aimed at achieving a particular outcome.


--------------------
Regards,
Fredd

__________________________________________________________________________
Pepipoo relies on you
to keep this site running!
Donate to Pepipoo now using your
Visa, Mastercard, debit card or PayPal account
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DancingDad
post Wed, 9 Oct 2019 - 21:09
Post #27


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 25,726
Joined: 28 Jun 2010
From: Area 51
Member No.: 38,559



Best argument I've seen yet for getting an electric vehicle..... can ignore speed limits biggrin.gif biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Charlie1010_*
post Thu, 10 Oct 2019 - 07:01
Post #28





Guests






Noise is also a pollutant.
Tyre noise especially from the ridiculously large tyres some people seem to desire.

https://www.oponeo.co.uk/blog/tyre-noise

This post has been edited by Charlie1010: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 - 07:04
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cp8759
post Fri, 11 Oct 2019 - 10:03
Post #29


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 38,007
Joined: 3 Dec 2010
Member No.: 42,618



QUOTE (DancingDad @ Wed, 9 Oct 2019 - 22:09) *
Best argument I've seen yet for getting an electric vehicle..... can ignore speed limits biggrin.gif biggrin.gif

Well quite. Imagine how the sale of EVs would skyrocket if EV, and only EVs, could do 80 or 90.


--------------------
If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LaughingLeaf
post Sat, 12 Oct 2019 - 17:52
Post #30


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 28
Joined: 6 Dec 2017
Member No.: 95,428



QUOTE (cp8759 @ Fri, 11 Oct 2019 - 11:03) *
QUOTE (DancingDad @ Wed, 9 Oct 2019 - 22:09) *
Best argument I've seen yet for getting an electric vehicle..... can ignore speed limits biggrin.gif biggrin.gif

Well quite. Imagine how the sale of EVs would skyrocket if EV, and only EVs, could do 80 or 90.


Yes, until the 90mph drivers realised they could only go 50 miles before charging up!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cp8759
post Sat, 12 Oct 2019 - 18:32
Post #31


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 38,007
Joined: 3 Dec 2010
Member No.: 42,618



QUOTE (LaughingLeaf @ Sat, 12 Oct 2019 - 18:52) *
QUOTE (cp8759 @ Fri, 11 Oct 2019 - 11:03) *
QUOTE (DancingDad @ Wed, 9 Oct 2019 - 22:09) *
Best argument I've seen yet for getting an electric vehicle..... can ignore speed limits biggrin.gif biggrin.gif

Well quite. Imagine how the sale of EVs would skyrocket if EV, and only EVs, could do 80 or 90.


Yes, until the 90mph drivers realised they could only go 50 miles before charging up!

The Tesla Roadster 2020 is meant to have a range of 600 miles at motorway speeds. I think they deem that to be 80 mph so maybe at 90, you'll only get 500 miles of range?


--------------------
If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Rookie
post Sat, 12 Oct 2019 - 18:45
Post #32


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 56,261
Joined: 9 Sep 2003
From: Warwickshire
Member No.: 317



Is that the Tesla roadster that was originally going to be launched in 2015 from the company that was going to have a 1000km Range by 2017 along with a full coast to coast self drive demo.

You need large quantities of Sodium Chloride to digest anything from Tesla!


--------------------
There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!

S172's
Rookies 1-0 Kent

Council PCN's
Rookies 1-0 Warwick
Rookies 1-0 Birmingham

PPC PCN's
Rookies 10-0 PPC's
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Tuesday, 16th April 2024 - 23:33
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here