PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

NIP 1 Month after the Event
bump
post Wed, 13 Jun 2018 - 17:50
Post #1


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 22 Sep 2011
Member No.: 49,819



Hello all,

My girlfriend received a Notice of Intended Prosecution letter this weekend dated 8th June. It was covering an alleged speeding offence in the early hours 6th May 2018, which means it took far longer than the usual 14 day period to arrive.

She emailed the SCP and they advised that the DVLA had the car's previous address recorded, though the V5 has the correct address on it.

According to their response, it is only the first Notice that is required to be served within 14 days of the offence, despite the information being held at the DVLA being incorrect.

Can the good people of this forum confirm if the above is sufficient to get round the usual 14 day rule?

Many thanks,

Tim
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 5)
Advertisement
post Wed, 13 Jun 2018 - 17:50
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Kickaha
post Wed, 13 Jun 2018 - 18:04
Post #2


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 2,349
Joined: 10 Jun 2010
Member No.: 38,126



The SCP answer was correct. I assume that the car has been recently purchased.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
666
post Wed, 13 Jun 2018 - 18:06
Post #3


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 962
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Member No.: 47,602



They are right. Have the DVLA got it wrong, or is there a simpler explanation?

Has she acquired the car recently? At the bottom of page 2 of the V5C the is a DOCREf with a date: that is when the DVLA database would have been updated.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bump
post Wed, 13 Jun 2018 - 18:13
Post #4


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 22 Sep 2011
Member No.: 49,819



QUOTE (666 @ Wed, 13 Jun 2018 - 19:06) *
They are right. Have the DVLA got it wrong, or is there a simpler explanation?

Has she acquired the car recently? At the bottom of page 2 of the V5C the is a DOCREf with a date: that is when the DVLA database would have been updated.

Hi 666. Doc is dated 27/07/17. Looks like the DVLA have got it wrong as the address on the V5 is her current address.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jlc
post Wed, 13 Jun 2018 - 18:48
Post #5


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 28,813
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
From: With Mickey
Member No.: 49,223



QUOTE (bump @ Wed, 13 Jun 2018 - 19:13) *
Doc is dated 27/07/17. Looks like the DVLA have got it wrong as the address on the V5 is her current address.

It's the docref date in DD MM YY format at the bottom of page 2 that's critical:


Attached Image


Also, is the address 100% correct?

If the DVLA records were correct and fully up to date then there's the making of a defence.

What's the alleged offence?

Regardless, the s172 (name the driver) request has to be responded to regardless.


--------------------
RK=Registered Keeper, OP=Original Poster (You!), CoFP=Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty, NtK=Notice to Keeper, NtD=Notice to Driver
PoFA=Protection of Freedoms Act, SAC=Safety Awareness Course, NIP=Notice of Intended Prosecution, ADR=Alternative Dispute Resolution
PPC=Private Parking Company, LBCCC=Letter Before County Court Claim, PII=Personally Identifiable Information

Private Parking - remember, they just want your money and will say almost anything to get it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bump
post Wed, 13 Jun 2018 - 19:18
Post #6


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 22 Sep 2011
Member No.: 49,819



QUOTE (Jlc @ Wed, 13 Jun 2018 - 19:48) *
QUOTE (bump @ Wed, 13 Jun 2018 - 19:13) *
Doc is dated 27/07/17. Looks like the DVLA have got it wrong as the address on the V5 is her current address.

It's the docref date in DD MM YY format at the bottom of page 2 that's critical:


Attached Image


Also, is the address 100% correct?

If the DVLA records were correct and fully up to date then there's the making of a defence.

What's the alleged offence?

Regardless, the s172 (name the driver) request has to be responded to regardless.

Hi Jlc. V5 address is absolutely correct.
Alleged offence is exceeding 30mph speed limit on restricted road
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Thursday, 20th September 2018 - 09:45
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.