PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Do these types of red light cameras measure speed?
sonnyred1
post Tue, 5 Jun 2018 - 19:48
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 29 Mar 2018
Member No.: 97,303



Hello, I was just driving past this road today and happen to drive past this speed camera that looks like a Peek Speed Camera. It is definately a red light camera but just wondering does this camera also catches speeding? Link: https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@52.619067,-1...3312!8i6656 I don't see the white markings like you normally do with Peek Cameras. I'm just curious as I happen drive past it around 32MPHish when it a 30. ( Dazed out. icon_redface.gif ) Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 15)
Advertisement
post Tue, 5 Jun 2018 - 19:48
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
notmeatloaf
post Tue, 5 Jun 2018 - 20:41
Post #2


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 3,306
Joined: 4 Mar 2017
Member No.: 90,659



Unless things have changed, they can in theory measure speed but they are not type approved. So they only actually enforce red lights.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jlc
post Tue, 5 Jun 2018 - 20:48
Post #3


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41,510
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
From: Planet Earth
Member No.: 49,223



32mph (which is likely 30/31 actual speed) wouldn't trigger anyway. 35mph is the usual start of enforcement.


--------------------
RK=Registered Keeper, OP=Original Poster (You!), CoFP=Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty, NtK=Notice to Keeper, NtD=Notice to Driver
PoFA=Protection of Freedoms Act, SAC=Safety Awareness Course, NIP=Notice of Intended Prosecution, ADR=Alternative Dispute Resolution
PPC=Private Parking Company, LBCCC=Letter Before County Court Claim, PII=Personally Identifiable Information, SAR=Subject Access Request

Private Parking - remember, they just want your money and will say almost anything to get it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sonnyred1
post Tue, 5 Jun 2018 - 20:48
Post #4


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 29 Mar 2018
Member No.: 97,303



QUOTE (notmeatloaf @ Tue, 5 Jun 2018 - 21:41) *
Unless things have changed, they can in theory measure speed but they are not type approved. So they only actually enforce red lights.


Thanks for your reply. I was curious because majority of the GASTO and PEEK Cameras I have drove past have those white lines running across the road. I think they are there for some sort of secondary measurment? I've seen a site also in Leicester where its measures speed and operates as a red light camera. https://i.gyazo.com/c997c61029f9b1e83c7d11ccab30b88d.jpg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
southpaw82
post Tue, 5 Jun 2018 - 20:56
Post #5


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 33,610
Joined: 2 Apr 2008
From: Not in the UK
Member No.: 18,483



Nevertheless, 32 in a 30...


--------------------
Moderator

Any comments made do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon. No lawyer/client relationship should be assumed nor should any duty of care be owed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jlc
post Tue, 5 Jun 2018 - 21:41
Post #6


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41,510
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
From: Planet Earth
Member No.: 49,223



Corroboration works in 2 ways. Either 2 snaps with a particular interval allows the primary measurement to be confirmed.

Or a timed snap to a given mark for a single picture.


--------------------
RK=Registered Keeper, OP=Original Poster (You!), CoFP=Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty, NtK=Notice to Keeper, NtD=Notice to Driver
PoFA=Protection of Freedoms Act, SAC=Safety Awareness Course, NIP=Notice of Intended Prosecution, ADR=Alternative Dispute Resolution
PPC=Private Parking Company, LBCCC=Letter Before County Court Claim, PII=Personally Identifiable Information, SAR=Subject Access Request

Private Parking - remember, they just want your money and will say almost anything to get it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sonnyred1
post Tue, 5 Jun 2018 - 21:56
Post #7


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 29 Mar 2018
Member No.: 97,303



QUOTE (Jlc @ Tue, 5 Jun 2018 - 22:41) *
Corroboration works in 2 ways. Either 2 snaps with a particular interval allows the primary measurement to be confirmed.

Or a timed snap to a given mark for a single picture.

So is there need for a secondary measurement? Like the horizontal lines for it to snap speeders Confused Kinda paranoid as I can only get 6points

This post has been edited by sonnyred1: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 - 21:58
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
southpaw82
post Tue, 5 Jun 2018 - 22:03
Post #8


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 33,610
Joined: 2 Apr 2008
From: Not in the UK
Member No.: 18,483



32 mph!!!


--------------------
Moderator

Any comments made do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon. No lawyer/client relationship should be assumed nor should any duty of care be owed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
peterguk
post Tue, 5 Jun 2018 - 22:50
Post #9


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 13,735
Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Member No.: 14,720



OP. A bit of (non-judgmental) advice.

In this and your other threads questioning camera operation and NIP rules you state your indicated speed was just over the limit and as a result worried about getting caught speeding.

You also state you're a new, inexperienced driver.

Learn to drive at an indicated speed at the limit or below. Not just over. If you continue driving just over the limit you'll end getting caught. At the very least you'll end up £100 lighter.

This post has been edited by peterguk: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 - 07:33


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Rookie
post Wed, 6 Jun 2018 - 00:44
Post #10


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 56,198
Joined: 9 Sep 2003
From: Warwickshire
Member No.: 317



Indeed, if you know your speed that precisely, why not drive 2mph slower and stop the angst? Or 5mph faster and know for sure?


--------------------
There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!

S172's
Rookies 1-0 Kent

Council PCN's
Rookies 1-0 Warwick
Rookies 1-0 Birmingham

PPC PCN's
Rookies 10-0 PPC's
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cp8759
post Thu, 7 Jun 2018 - 19:25
Post #11


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 38,006
Joined: 3 Dec 2010
Member No.: 42,618



QUOTE (southpaw82 @ Tue, 5 Jun 2018 - 21:56) *
Nevertheless, 32 in a 30...

The supreme court said 31 in a 30 deserves an absolute discharge, 32 isn't far off.


--------------------
If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
southpaw82
post Thu, 7 Jun 2018 - 19:43
Post #12


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 33,610
Joined: 2 Apr 2008
From: Not in the UK
Member No.: 18,483



QUOTE (cp8759 @ Thu, 7 Jun 2018 - 20:25) *
QUOTE (southpaw82 @ Tue, 5 Jun 2018 - 21:56) *
Nevertheless, 32 in a 30...

The supreme court said 31 in a 30 deserves an absolute discharge, 32 isn't far off.

How it’d get that far remains a mystery.


--------------------
Moderator

Any comments made do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon. No lawyer/client relationship should be assumed nor should any duty of care be owed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cp8759
post Fri, 8 Jun 2018 - 12:51
Post #13


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 38,006
Joined: 3 Dec 2010
Member No.: 42,618



QUOTE (southpaw82 @ Thu, 7 Jun 2018 - 20:43) *
QUOTE (cp8759 @ Thu, 7 Jun 2018 - 20:25) *
QUOTE (southpaw82 @ Tue, 5 Jun 2018 - 21:56) *
Nevertheless, 32 in a 30...

The supreme court said 31 in a 30 deserves an absolute discharge, 32 isn't far off.

How it’d get that far remains a mystery.

You just argue in the court of first instance that, following the comments made by the Supreme Court, an absolute or at most a conditional discharge would be appropriate for doing 32 in a 30.


--------------------
If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
couchiedemon
post Fri, 8 Jun 2018 - 14:43
Post #14


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 87
Joined: 21 Oct 2010
Member No.: 41,467



I got flashed by a red light camera in New Cross in London a couple of years ago. I subsequently got done for speeding, not red light jumping.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Rookie
post Fri, 8 Jun 2018 - 15:22
Post #15


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 56,198
Joined: 9 Sep 2003
From: Warwickshire
Member No.: 317



So? We know many RLC can be ‘speed on green’, this isn’t one of the, as pointed out above.


--------------------
There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!

S172's
Rookies 1-0 Kent

Council PCN's
Rookies 1-0 Warwick
Rookies 1-0 Birmingham

PPC PCN's
Rookies 10-0 PPC's
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
southpaw82
post Fri, 8 Jun 2018 - 21:13
Post #16


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 33,610
Joined: 2 Apr 2008
From: Not in the UK
Member No.: 18,483



QUOTE (cp8759 @ Fri, 8 Jun 2018 - 13:51) *
QUOTE (southpaw82 @ Thu, 7 Jun 2018 - 20:43) *
QUOTE (cp8759 @ Thu, 7 Jun 2018 - 20:25) *
QUOTE (southpaw82 @ Tue, 5 Jun 2018 - 21:56) *
Nevertheless, 32 in a 30...

The supreme court said 31 in a 30 deserves an absolute discharge, 32 isn't far off.

How it’d get that far remains a mystery.

You just argue in the court of first instance that, following the comments made by the Supreme Court, an absolute or at most a conditional discharge would be appropriate for doing 32 in a 30.

I’d be surprised if it was ever proceeded with. The only time I’m aware of a speed less than the 10% + 2 threshold being proceeded with was when the speed was argued down (on one version) to 34mph. Such a scenario is the only way I can see a prosecution for 31 proceeding - where it had started off as 35 or more.


--------------------
Moderator

Any comments made do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon. No lawyer/client relationship should be assumed nor should any duty of care be owed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 23:14
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here