PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Independent Appeals Service
long un
post Wed, 12 Sep 2018 - 11:04
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 37
Joined: 19 Dec 2007
Member No.: 16,159



Hello.

Please accept my apologies if this is going over old ground but my head is hurtling looking through the old posts.

I recently appealed against a VCS parking charge notice on behalf of one of my drivers. Today we received the inevitable rejection.

The letter states.

"The signs in the car park make it clear that the land is private property and that a charge of £100 will be levied if vehicles park outside of the Terms and Conditions displayed."

It then goes on to direct me to The Independent Appeals Services if i believe the decision incorrect.

Firstly, the vehicle in question was a 44t Articulated low loader that was dropping off asphalt paving equipment to a major development on the industrial estate that the road is situated on. He was on the main road, not in a car park. he had recently unloaded the plant and was on site at the time.

My wording on the VCS appeal was as follows.

"Please note that the above reason is not correct but your drop down box did not offer an option that suited the reason for parking and i was unable to continue the appeal without picking an option. Maybe you could include a reason that says "other" to assist people using this facility.

The above vehicle was parked as shown in the pictures as it was servicing the new development to the emediate left of where it was parked. I recently unloaded tarmacadam surfacing equipment and dropped them on site. As you can see in the photos, the vehicles is 50' long and 44t gross weight therefor I was unable to unload in a car park. The vehicle was parked on a wide and quiet road with no obstruction to vehicles using the road. With this in mind i would ask that you accept this appeal."

The pictures of the vehicle clearly show the site hordings to the nearside of the vehicle.

The second and main reason for this post is the Independent Appeals Services part. Whenever we have appealed in the past it has been to Popla and all appeals have been succesfull. Seeing a different appeals service rang alarm bells and looking at the various things i have read online i'm guessing the IAS are a bit one sided.



What is the best way to proceed with this? Thanks in advance for any advice offered and once again, apologies if this is accessible elsewhere and i've missed it.

Cheers

Mark







Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 10)
Advertisement
post Wed, 12 Sep 2018 - 11:04
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
ohnoes
post Wed, 12 Sep 2018 - 11:06
Post #2


Member
Group Icon

Group: Bad Boyz & Girlz
Posts: 155
Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Member No.: 83,810



Do not appeal to the IAS.

This post has been edited by ohnoes: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 - 11:07


--------------------
PCNs sucessfully contested with the help of this forum:
Newham 1/1
Enfield 1/1
Hackney 2/3

PPC successfully contested with the help of this forum:
UKPC 1/1
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ostell
post Wed, 12 Sep 2018 - 11:09
Post #3


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 8,149
Joined: 8 Mar 2013
Member No.: 60,457



Normally suggested that you do not appeal to the IAS as they will reject.

Have you found out the status of the road? Contact the local council and see if the road is adopted. The information will probably be on a web page.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
long un
post Wed, 12 Sep 2018 - 14:59
Post #4


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 37
Joined: 19 Dec 2007
Member No.: 16,159



As far as i am aware the road is privately owned. There is a huge ongoing development on the estate, we are a contractor on the development.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MatchlessG80
post Wed, 12 Sep 2018 - 15:22
Post #5


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 39
Joined: 21 Apr 2018
Member No.: 97,620



So, theoretically (according to whatever signage is on site). there must be the possibility of paying VCS for the privilege of parking where your lorry was parked (or obtaining 'permission' from them to park - if not I don't see how any possible contact could be formed? If you were delivering 5 tonnes of bricks would VCS expect you to take them in wheelbarrow loads to the site from some place where it is possible to park? They might, but not in any normal universe. The fact that the vehicle could only unload practically by stopping where it did suggests a key difference to a car being parked there because its occupants were too lazy to walk. VCS seem particularly weak on signs and the contractual basis of their claims. Not that it stops them ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
long un
post Wed, 12 Sep 2018 - 15:46
Post #6


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 37
Joined: 19 Dec 2007
Member No.: 16,159



If my it skills aren't as bad as i think they are, this is the signage on the road. The contravention reason is: Parked in a restricted/prohibited area.

The wagon was parked on double yellows to unload.



Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eljayjay
post Wed, 12 Sep 2018 - 16:50
Post #7


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 800
Joined: 1 Apr 2017
Member No.: 91,235



That is a forbidding sign.

The parking operator cannot say "No parking... " and then in the next breath offer parking.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
freddy1
post Wed, 12 Sep 2018 - 19:40
Post #8


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 4 Jan 2007
Member No.: 9,897



who hired VCS , the same company that employed you to deliver? , contact the person or company that hired VCS and get them to intervene , you and your colleagues could shut the site down if you asked other drivers of the problem
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Churchmouse
post Wed, 12 Sep 2018 - 22:19
Post #9


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 1,875
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
From: Landan
Member No.: 20,731



QUOTE (Eljayjay @ Wed, 12 Sep 2018 - 17:50) *
That is a forbidding sign.

The parking operator cannot say "No parking... " and then in the next breath offer parking.

They appear to be offering a contract not to park (or wait). Interesting idea, but I think the main problem is that they are not offering anything to the driver that would qualify as "consideration" for the driver's promise to pay the charge.

--Churchmouse
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
long un
post Thu, 13 Sep 2018 - 13:56
Post #10


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 37
Joined: 19 Dec 2007
Member No.: 16,159



Thanks for the advice. I'll sit on it and see what comes next.

Cheers

Mark
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eljayjay
post Thu, 13 Sep 2018 - 15:45
Post #11


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 800
Joined: 1 Apr 2017
Member No.: 91,235



Whatever you do, do not ignore a letter of/before action/claim.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Sunday, 23rd September 2018 - 09:21
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.