PCN - Euro Parking Services, Birmingham |
PCN - Euro Parking Services, Birmingham |
Fri, 22 Mar 2019 - 22:23
Post
#1
|
|
New Member Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 22 Mar 2019 Member No.: 103,059 |
Hi there,
Need some advice on this one. Received a NTK from Euro Parking Services. Stamp on the envelope shows it was sent on the 19/03/2019. Received 21/03 A final notice letter was issued also the same day but received 20/03 (sent 1st class not 2nd as per NTK). I never received the NTK for this one. Looking at dates of camera image they are two different contraventions. Nothing was received on the windscreen of the vehicle. The driver was there for 6 minutes only on 1st one and the same time on the 2nd. I understand EPS are IPC and not BPA. Therefore does the 14 day rule count? Attached are pictures of the letters with relevant details. Much appreciated. Cant get a picture of sign at the moment as away from home. Note that no one approached the driver on both occasions and the serial numbers are different on both letters. Seems strange they arrive at the same time. Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/164829923@N06/ This post has been edited by VB3VB3: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 - 22:38 |
|
|
Advertisement |
Fri, 22 Mar 2019 - 22:23
Post
#
|
Advertise here! |
|
|
|
Sat, 23 Mar 2019 - 06:11
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 74 Joined: 9 Sep 2015 Member No.: 79,293 |
Others with more expertise will be along shortly, but I am certain that the 14 day rule applies as it is part of Protection Of Freedom Act 2012, not just a BPA rule, so the first one is definitely out of time by some margin, if as you say there was no windscreen ticket. Re the second one, have you moved or had the address on the V5C changed recently?
|
|
|
Sat, 23 Mar 2019 - 10:35
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 17,088 Joined: 8 Mar 2013 Member No.: 60,457 |
The LAW is schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, adherence to this is required to hold the keeper liable. The IPC Code of Practise is secondary to this, though the beavis case stated that they must comply with the CoP.
As there was no windscreen ticket then paragraph 9, with the 14 day requirement, applies otherwise its paragraph 8 with a requirement of 28 to 56 days. Post up the redacted NTK that you do have for comment, but leave the dates. This post has been edited by ostell: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 - 10:36 |
|
|
Sun, 24 Mar 2019 - 14:35
Post
#4
|
|
New Member Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 22 Mar 2019 Member No.: 103,059 |
The LAW is schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, adherence to this is required to hold the keeper liable. The IPC Code of Practise is secondary to this, though the beavis case stated that they must comply with the CoP. As there was no windscreen ticket then paragraph 9, with the 14 day requirement, applies otherwise its paragraph 8 with a requirement of 28 to 56 days. Post up the redacted NTK that you do have for comment, but leave the dates. HI The images on Flickr are all I have received. |
|
|
Sun, 24 Mar 2019 - 21:21
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 17,088 Joined: 8 Mar 2013 Member No.: 60,457 |
OK , the date of posting was more than 14 days after the parking event and therefore they have failed to comply with the requirements of POFA to be able to hold the keeper liable. Here's POFA, they have failed 9 (4). Look under my name for an out of time appeal to send
|
|
|
Thu, 4 Apr 2019 - 19:44
Post
#6
|
|
New Member Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 22 Mar 2019 Member No.: 103,059 |
This topic can now be closed
Because of some circumstances, I have just settled them |
|
|
Fri, 5 Apr 2019 - 16:39
Post
#7
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 17,088 Joined: 8 Mar 2013 Member No.: 60,457 |
Any particular reason, as the first one was definitely no keeper liability
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 12:15 |