Unloading Claim Rejected |
Unloading Claim Rejected |
Tue, 28 May 2019 - 07:24
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 220 Joined: 30 Apr 2008 Member No.: 19,194 |
Hi All,
One of our vans got ticketed whilst unloading on non-restricted double yellow lines. We appealed with supporting evidence but this got rejected because the van was near a junction. Can anyone see anything incorrect about the council's letter before we pay? Cheers. |
|
|
Thu, 8 Aug 2019 - 08:15
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 35,063 Joined: 2 Aug 2008 From: Woking Member No.: 21,551 |
Well regardless of what hcandersen might think, we clearly know the NtO is dated 16 July,
If it's been posted, then fine. Which post? So instead of contacting the council to find out the actual position, the OP or whoever is going to make reps against someone else's NTO on the flimsiest of bases, namely the letter from the lease company to the council which does not explicitly or IMO implicity authorise the nominated to person to do anything AND the lease company's letter to the nominated person that they have written to the council to TRANSFER liability. And this despite having the best part of a fortnight to simply contact the council to find out the situation. One minute we're waiting for a NTO in the nominated person's name, then we're not, and all because no contact has been made with the council. OP, you seem happy to accept this advice - on someone else's behalf? - without answering any of the questions posed. Good luck. PS: don't send the lease company's letter to you/nominated person to the council because if anything this would tell the council that you/they are NOT authorised but that, as the letter states very clearly, the company's intent is that liability should be transferred to the addressee in which case how the hell can you or anyone make reps?? This post has been edited by hcandersen: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 - 09:02 |
|
|
Thu, 8 Aug 2019 - 17:36
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 38,006 Joined: 3 Dec 2010 Member No.: 42,618 |
Well regardless of what hcandersen might think, we clearly know the NtO is dated 16 July, If it's been posted, then fine. Which post? 33 Thank you so much I will update again they reject Don't forget the nominated person must keep on the lease company's back, if the council reject you don't want the lease company to panic and pay the penalty, as you then lose the opportunity to appeal further. It might be an idea to pre-emotively inform them that if the council reject the nominated person intends to appeal to the tribunal, and make sure they're on board with this. -------------------- If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Friday, 29th March 2024 - 06:15 |