Just a questtion , out of interest., parking on private land. |
Just a questtion , out of interest., parking on private land. |
Mon, 20 Nov 2017 - 19:34
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 241 Joined: 15 Aug 2006 From: Buckinghamshire Member No.: 7,182 |
If a private parking site has a notice with supposedly " Terms and conditions " and on the car park signs they display the required badge that states they belong to the IPC, BPA, and the IAS , but they only belong to the IPC , does this invalidate their parking signs, as in would they stand up in court ? hoping the more informed on this site might answer. Thank you. |
|
|
Advertisement |
Mon, 20 Nov 2017 - 19:34
Post
#
|
Advertise here! |
|
|
|
Mon, 20 Nov 2017 - 19:41
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Life Member Posts: 24,214 Joined: 9 Sep 2004 From: Reading Member No.: 1,624 |
No
-------------------- Andy
Some people think that I make them feel stupid. To be fair, they deserve most of the credit. |
|
|
Mon, 20 Nov 2017 - 19:50
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 41,510 Joined: 25 Aug 2011 From: Planet Earth Member No.: 49,223 |
There’s membership and approved operator status. Some PPC's do have both this why BPA and IPC. There's subtly different badges.
-------------------- RK=Registered Keeper, OP=Original Poster (You!), CoFP=Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty, NtK=Notice to Keeper, NtD=Notice to Driver
PoFA=Protection of Freedoms Act, SAC=Safety Awareness Course, NIP=Notice of Intended Prosecution, ADR=Alternative Dispute Resolution PPC=Private Parking Company, LBCCC=Letter Before County Court Claim, PII=Personally Identifiable Information, SAR=Subject Access Request Private Parking - remember, they just want your money and will say almost anything to get it. |
|
|
Tue, 21 Nov 2017 - 09:12
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 28,931 Joined: 29 Nov 2005 Member No.: 4,323 |
wouldn't affect a parking case but IIRC it is a breach of CPUTR (not that Trading Stadards seems to care)
-------------------- Which facts in any situation or problem are “essential” and what makes them “essential”? If the “essential” facts are said to depend on the principles involved, then the whole business, all too obviously, goes right around in a circle. In the light of one principle or set of principles, one bunch of facts will be the “essential” ones; in the light of another principle or set of principles, a different bunch of facts will be “essential.” In order to settle on the right facts you first have to pick your principles, although the whole point of finding the facts was to indicate which principles apply.
Note that I am not legally qualified and any and all statements made are "Reserved". Liability for application lies with the reader. |
|
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2017 - 10:00
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 2,356 Joined: 30 Jun 2008 From: Landan Member No.: 20,731 |
If a private parking site has a notice with supposedly " Terms and conditions " and on the car park signs they display the required badge that states they belong to the IPC, BPA, and the IAS , but they only belong to the IPC , does this invalidate their parking signs, as in would they stand up in court ? As already noted, no. But it is likely that other things on the signs are incorrect or at least arguably invalid. The only way to know for sure is to read them (or ask us to read them). --Churchmouse |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Friday, 29th March 2024 - 08:59 |