[NIP Wizard] Accidentally crept through red light, NIP sent, what to expect (never had an NIP before). |
[NIP Wizard] Accidentally crept through red light, NIP sent, what to expect (never had an NIP before). |
Sat, 16 Jan 2021 - 08:18
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 16 Jan 2021 Member No.: 111,252 |
NIP Details and Circumstances
What is the name of the Constabulary? - Date of the offence: - January 2021 Date of the NIP: - 4 days after the offence Date you received the NIP: - 5 days after the offence Location of offence (exact location as it appears on the NIP: important): - Lewes Road A270 google link - A270, Brighton https://goo.gl/maps/AVxbDR5T5LdAqEtz8 (I’ll have to check the exact location as listed when I’m off my work shift. Was the NIP addressed to you? - Yes Was the NIP sent by first class post, second class or recorded delivery? - Not known If your are not the Registered Keeper, what is your relationship to the vehicle? - How many current points do you have? - 0 Provide a description of events (if you know what happened) telling us as much about the incident as possible - some things that may seem trivial to you may be important, so don't leave anything out. Please do not post personal details for obvious reasons - Accidentally crawled through a red light trying to find a new build not listed on a sat nav, sat nav giving incorrect instructions (understand this is not legal mitigation). Stopped on other side of red light when I realised NIP Wizard Responses These were the responses used by the Wizard to arrive at its recommendation: Have you received a NIP? - Yes Are you the Registered Keeper of the vehicle concerned (is your name and address on the V5/V5C)? - Yes Did the first NIP arrive within 14 days? - Yes Although you are the Registered Keeper, were you also the keeper of the vehicle concerned (the person normally responsible for it) at the time of the alleged offence? - Yes Were you driving? - Yes Which country did the alleged offence take place in? - England NIP Wizard Recommendation Based on these responses the Wizard suggested that this course of action should be considered:
Generated by the PePiPoo NIP Wizard v3.3.2: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 08:18:19 +0000 This post has been edited by Fragglesque: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 - 08:21 |
|
|
Advertisement |
Sat, 16 Jan 2021 - 08:18
Post
#
|
Advertise here! |
|
|
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2021 - 07:06
Post
#41
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 56,198 Joined: 9 Sep 2003 From: Warwickshire Member No.: 317 |
Because that’s not a legally required document and has no specific format, it is in fact just a courtesy, so there is no need for it to explain anything at all.
-------------------- There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!
S172's Rookies 1-0 Kent Council PCN's Rookies 1-0 Warwick Rookies 1-0 Birmingham PPC PCN's Rookies 10-0 PPC's |
|
|
Thu, 6 May 2021 - 14:38
Post
#42
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 16 Jan 2021 Member No.: 111,252 |
So my SJPN has arrived today, I'm just trying to work out the wording of my mitigation. I'm just wondering whether its worth mentioning about the stress of 2 of my relatives passing and 1 being seriously ill at the time, and that I'd been working NHS Covid frontline thought and had a pretty horrid run of jobs in the month preceding this, or whether that makes no odds, and would just lead them to question whether I was too stressed to have been driving?
|
|
|
Thu, 6 May 2021 - 15:13
Post
#43
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 56,198 Joined: 9 Sep 2003 From: Warwickshire Member No.: 317 |
You got it right at the end, suggesting you were so stressed you shouldn't have been driving is aggravating not mitigating. If you have no mitigation best say nothing at all.
-------------------- There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!
S172's Rookies 1-0 Kent Council PCN's Rookies 1-0 Warwick Rookies 1-0 Birmingham PPC PCN's Rookies 10-0 PPC's |
|
|
Thu, 6 May 2021 - 15:36
Post
#44
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 16 Jan 2021 Member No.: 111,252 |
You got it right at the end, suggesting you were so stressed you shouldn't have been driving is aggravating not mitigating. If you have no mitigation best say nothing at all. Mitigation wise I've just mentioned that I navigated to an incorrectly plotted postcode for a new building that had been recently finished, went through the lightt slowly, stopped when I realised to swap insurance details incase I'd caused and accident and to see if anyone needed medical attention, and that I've never had fines or endorsements in the 20 odd years I've been driving. QUOTE I fully accept responsibility for the offence, and would like to take the opportunity that this instance was completely out of character, I have held a full U.K. license since November 2001 and in that time have had no endorsements or fines on my license.
At the time I was searching for a brand new address (the new Brighton ambulance station) which had only opened weeks before and the postcode had plotted to this road. With no obvious access to the address being found, I misunderstood the traffic light and filter lane ahead and drove through at I believe less than 20 miles per hour accidentally. On realising my mistake I did stop in the filter lane to the left hand side to see if anything could be done to mitigate any danger I had caused, to ensure I had not caused an accident and if I had to offer medical assistance in line with my professional training and to potentially swap insurance details. On being assured that no collisions had occurred and seeing another car pull up behind me in the filter lane, I once again proceeded to use the filter lane to pull off the A270 and clear the way for vehicles proceeding behind me. As someone who drives professionally and works in an industry where taking responsibility, striving for improvement and acting with integrity are paramount, the weight of this prosecution lays heavily on my conscience and I am keen to offer my sincere apologies for this incident and to learn and improve from this experience. |
|
|
Thu, 6 May 2021 - 15:49
Post
#45
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 56,198 Joined: 9 Sep 2003 From: Warwickshire Member No.: 317 |
Send by all means, don’t expect it to make any difference AT ALL. Quite literally none.
-------------------- There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!
S172's Rookies 1-0 Kent Council PCN's Rookies 1-0 Warwick Rookies 1-0 Birmingham PPC PCN's Rookies 10-0 PPC's |
|
|
Thu, 6 May 2021 - 15:59
Post
#46
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 3,300 Joined: 17 Jun 2011 Member No.: 47,602 |
Mitigation wise I've just mentioned that I navigated to an incorrectly plotted postcode for a new building that had been recently finished, went through the lightt slowly, stopped when I realised to swap insurance details incase I'd caused and accident and to see if anyone needed medical attention, and that I've never had fines or endorsements in the 20 odd years I've been driving. There was no accident, so even don't suggest that there might have been. That makes a fairly trivial offence sound much worse than it was. And your clean driving record will make no difference. The less said the better. |
|
|
Thu, 6 May 2021 - 16:00
Post
#47
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 16 Jan 2021 Member No.: 111,252 |
|
|
|
Thu, 6 May 2021 - 16:11
Post
#48
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 41,508 Joined: 25 Aug 2011 From: Planet Earth Member No.: 49,223 |
The less said the better. I think so too - the last thing you want is for the SJ to refer it to court. -------------------- RK=Registered Keeper, OP=Original Poster (You!), CoFP=Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty, NtK=Notice to Keeper, NtD=Notice to Driver
PoFA=Protection of Freedoms Act, SAC=Safety Awareness Course, NIP=Notice of Intended Prosecution, ADR=Alternative Dispute Resolution PPC=Private Parking Company, LBCCC=Letter Before County Court Claim, PII=Personally Identifiable Information, SAR=Subject Access Request Private Parking - remember, they just want your money and will say almost anything to get it. |
|
|
Thu, 6 May 2021 - 19:55
Post
#49
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 13,572 Joined: 28 Mar 2010 Member No.: 36,528 |
So if you remove anything which implies this was a more serious incident than it was, and make a couple of corrections you are left with:
I fully accept responsibility for the offence, and would like to take the opportunity to state that this instance was completely out of character. I have held a full U.K. licence since November 2001 and in that time have had no endorsements on my licence or any fines. At the time I was searching for a brand new address (the new Brighton ambulance station) which had only opened weeks before and the postcode had plotted to this road. With no obvious access to the address being found, I misunderstood the traffic light and filter lane ahead and drove through at I believe less than 20 miles per hour, without causing any danger or inconvenience to any other traffic. As explained, this will not make the slightest difference but this version should at least not make matters worse. Many people do feel that they want to explain what happened and why, although recognising it makes no difference. -------------------- |
|
|
Thu, 10 Jun 2021 - 06:48
Post
#50
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 16 Jan 2021 Member No.: 111,252 |
So fine and points received from single justice service, fine paid and the email says the DVLA will ask for my license if they need it. I’ve read quite a lot about people getting extra fines for not sending their license to the DVLA, even though they didn’t know they needed to. Is this still something the DVLA do, or is it all done via their database now? Should I be expecting them to ask me to send my driving license card in?
|
|
|
Thu, 10 Jun 2021 - 07:10
Post
#51
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 56,198 Joined: 9 Sep 2003 From: Warwickshire Member No.: 317 |
I’ve read quite a lot about people getting extra fines for not sending their license to the DVLA, even though they didn’t know they needed to. I think what you mean by that is that they ended up with a larger fine by not sending the licence to the fixed penalty office and their case ending up in court. You are way past that stage. There is no concept of a fine for not sending your licence to DVLA. As long as the court and DVLA are both sure they know the identity of the person convicted that will be the end of it. -------------------- There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!
S172's Rookies 1-0 Kent Council PCN's Rookies 1-0 Warwick Rookies 1-0 Birmingham PPC PCN's Rookies 10-0 PPC's |
|
|
Thu, 10 Jun 2021 - 14:21
Post
#52
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 16 Jan 2021 Member No.: 111,252 |
I’ve read quite a lot about people getting extra fines for not sending their license to the DVLA, even though they didn’t know they needed to. I think what you mean by that is that they ended up with a larger fine by not sending the licence to the fixed penalty office and their case ending up in court. You are way past that stage. There is no concept of a fine for not sending your licence to DVLA. As long as the court and DVLA are both sure they know the identity of the person convicted that will be the end of it. Thanks, good to know. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 20:07 |