Tunbridge Wells Bad signane appeal success |
Tunbridge Wells Bad signane appeal success |
Wed, 13 Nov 2019 - 16:46
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 6,963 Joined: 19 Dec 2006 From: Near Calais Member No.: 9,683 |
Thanks to everyone for the help on this one, I had a call from the Tribunal yesterday that it was going to phone appeal but got this email today:
Mr roythebus, you have won this appeal. There is nothing to pay and the authority will cancel the penalty charge This is because the authority did not contest your appeal. Adjudicator's reasons: The council has decided not to contest this appeal. I therefore direct that the appeal is allowed without consideration of any evidence or the merits of the case. The Council have stated the following: On further review we can see that our notice of rejection showed the incorrect outstanding amount. Mr roythebus is not liable to pay the outstanding penalty charge. |
|
|
Advertisement |
Wed, 13 Nov 2019 - 16:46
Post
#
|
Advertise here! |
|
|
|
Thu, 14 Nov 2019 - 06:46
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 56,197 Joined: 9 Sep 2003 From: Warwickshire Member No.: 317 |
So they didn't want to admit to bad signage (worms out the can) so admitted to a procedural error.
-------------------- There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!
S172's Rookies 1-0 Kent Council PCN's Rookies 1-0 Warwick Rookies 1-0 Birmingham PPC PCN's Rookies 10-0 PPC's |
|
|
Thu, 14 Nov 2019 - 10:21
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 6,963 Joined: 19 Dec 2006 From: Near Calais Member No.: 9,683 |
Seems that way. the adjudicator didn't go further than the first page so it seems. I don't suppose they wanted to admit the cock-up with sending the Charge Certificate early either.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 14:20 |