PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

HELP, please, Highview Parking Ltd- receipt of County Court Claim Form
Tim24121998
post Sat, 27 Nov 2021 - 10:59
Post #1


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 27 Nov 2021
Member No.: 114,868



I have this morning received a county court claim form from Highview Parking Ltd regarding two PCNs issued for parking longer than was allowed at Cannon Park Shopping Centre / Tesco in Cannon Hill Coventry 27/11/2018 and 30/11/2018. Shockingly the amount being pursued is now £473.81!!

Particulars of claim:

1.The defendant (D) is indebted to the claimant © for a parking charge(s) issued to vehicle XYZ at Cannon Park ….
2The PCN details are 27/11/2018 and 30/11/2018
3.The PCN(s) was issued on private land owned or managed by C. The vehicle was parked in breach of the terms on Cs signs (the contract), thus incurring the PCN(s).
4.The driver agreed to pay within 28 days but did not. {NOTE: confused by this, I assume this was by default as a result of not responding to the notices???). Despite requests, the PCN(s) is outstanding. The contract entitles C to damages.

I understand a series of mistakes were made leading to this point, but would really appreciate if someone here is able to advise the best course of action here?

Thank you in advance of any guidance, please let me know what further information will paint a clearer picture

This post has been edited by Tim24121998: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 - 11:44
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 8)
Advertisement
post Sat, 27 Nov 2021 - 10:59
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Sheffield Dave
post Sat, 27 Nov 2021 - 11:29
Post #2


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 2,053
Joined: 20 May 2013
Member No.: 62,052



Have you had any communication with Highview of any kind? If so, did you at any point reveal the identity of the driver, or hint at their relationship to you, the registered keeper?
If not, then edit your first post to avoid hinting: "the driver" drove on the day, while you, the RK, have received the claim form and any other paperwork.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tim24121998
post Sat, 27 Nov 2021 - 11:34
Post #3


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 27 Nov 2021
Member No.: 114,868



QUOTE (Sheffield Dave @ Sat, 27 Nov 2021 - 11:29) *
Have you had any communication with Highview of any kind? If so, did you at any point reveal the identity of the driver, or hint at their relationship to you, the registered keeper?
If not, then edit your first post to avoid hinting: "the driver" drove on the day, while you, the RK, have received the claim form and any other paperwork.



Hi Dave, thanks for the response - I have now edited the original post. I have had no comms with Highview whatsoever.

This post has been edited by Tim24121998: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 - 11:41
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DWMB2
post Sat, 27 Nov 2021 - 11:35
Post #4


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,363
Joined: 9 Apr 2021
Member No.: 112,205



Your edit has made things worse. You were told NOT to reveal who was driving.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tim24121998
post Sat, 27 Nov 2021 - 11:45
Post #5


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 27 Nov 2021
Member No.: 114,868



QUOTE (DWMB2 @ Sat, 27 Nov 2021 - 11:35) *
Your edit has made things worse. You were told NOT to reveal who was driving.


Apologies and thanks for the heads up, I misread!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jlc
post Sat, 27 Nov 2021 - 13:30
Post #6


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 41,503
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
From: Planet Earth
Member No.: 49,223



QUOTE (Tim24121998 @ Sat, 27 Nov 2021 - 11:34) *
I have had no comms with Highview whatsoever.

You'll need to be clearer. Are you saying the claim form is the first contact you've had or did you receive other letters and have ignored them?


--------------------
RK=Registered Keeper, OP=Original Poster (You!), CoFP=Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty, NtK=Notice to Keeper, NtD=Notice to Driver
PoFA=Protection of Freedoms Act, SAC=Safety Awareness Course, NIP=Notice of Intended Prosecution, ADR=Alternative Dispute Resolution
PPC=Private Parking Company, LBCCC=Letter Before County Court Claim, PII=Personally Identifiable Information, SAR=Subject Access Request

Private Parking - remember, they just want your money and will say almost anything to get it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tim24121998
post Sat, 27 Nov 2021 - 13:48
Post #7


New Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 27 Nov 2021
Member No.: 114,868



QUOTE (Jlc @ Sat, 27 Nov 2021 - 13:30) *
QUOTE (Tim24121998 @ Sat, 27 Nov 2021 - 11:34) *
I have had no comms with Highview whatsoever.

You'll need to be clearer. Are you saying the claim form is the first contact you've had or did you receive other letters and have ignored them?



I have received other letters and ignored them, I meant I have not communicated with them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DWMB2
post Sat, 27 Nov 2021 - 14:06
Post #8


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 4,363
Joined: 9 Apr 2021
Member No.: 112,205



That isn't ideal, as it can make you look unreasonable at court, but what's done is done. A good place to start is this post HERE which explains the court process, what you have to do and by when, etc. There's also a template defence that you ca adapt.

Was there any compelling reason why the driver overstayed? If so, that could be relevant to your defence. If not, you'll need to rely on other factors. As you have not told Highview who was driving, they don't know the identity of the driver, so their claim is against you, the registered keeper. To hold you liable they need to have complied with Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act (POFA, link in my signature), which they often don't. Can you show us a copy of the original parking charges/Notices to Keeper you received?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nosferatu1001
post Sat, 27 Nov 2021 - 22:23
Post #9


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 28,687
Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Member No.: 15,642



Yep, ignoring is not the brightest move.

As above, we need to know
- if the defendant , ie the named person on the form , was NOT driving. Only answer if they weren't

- why the driver overstayed. And by EXACTLY how much each time.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 08:57
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here