Speeding/Criminal Case Success Stories! |
Speeding/Criminal Case Success Stories! |
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 - 23:28
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 4,714 Joined: 3 Sep 2003 From: ex-Scotland Member No.: 298 |
I am trying to build a library of all the PePiPoo cases that have had happy endings, be it written confirmation or timed out.
Can all users post the link to their (or any other cases they know about) threads so a database can be made up. Once I have a list I will edit this post and update it as and when required. Not that we get them that often, but when the trolls appear on the site and start having a go, it would be nice to point them in the direction of people who have "had a go" and came out unscathed. Cheers. -------------------- Regards,
ff Benefitted from PePiPoo? Useful Info: 1 Read This First 2. 14-day Rule; 3. 6-month Rule. 4. NIP Wizard. 5. Success Stories. |
|
|
Advertisement |
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 - 23:28
Post
#
|
Advertise here! |
|
|
|
Tue, 7 Dec 2004 - 11:11
Post
#41
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 4,714 Joined: 3 Sep 2003 From: ex-Scotland Member No.: 298 |
-------------------- Regards,
ff Benefitted from PePiPoo? Useful Info: 1 Read This First 2. 14-day Rule; 3. 6-month Rule. 4. NIP Wizard. 5. Success Stories. |
|
|
Wed, 8 Dec 2004 - 17:27
Post
#42
|
|
Member Group: Life Member Posts: 1,204 Joined: 18 Jan 2004 From: Northants Member No.: 783 |
Had a "fun" win recently.
Charge was speeding. Form sent back properly signed. Video evidence was pretty conclusive BUT S9 statement said that S172 notice sent out but concluded "no reply has been received". Prosecutor read out statement but not the last bit. JJ: "Would you please read it all" Prosecutor (nice girl with rapidly reddening face) reads final paragraph but says "That's obviously a mistake because......." JJ: (leaping to feet) objects as witness statement contains warning about prosecution if statement false so Prosecutor can't give evidence. Submission of no case to answer made on basis that no evidence that client was driver was upheld so case dismissed with order for costs. Can't comment as to whether this was a just result but it does go to show that the S9 statements should be scrutinised very carefully. |
|
|
Mon, 13 Dec 2004 - 00:06
Post
#43
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 8,639 Joined: 5 Jul 2003 Member No.: 134 |
Micky B, another sub-section (4). Didn't get to summons.
|
|
|
Tue, 28 Dec 2004 - 21:11
Post
#44
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 8,639 Joined: 5 Jul 2003 Member No.: 134 |
S2softy, another sub-section (4). He had been named as the driver by his company; so, presumably, the CPS would have had to show that the information 'was in his power to give', or, that being 'Team Leader' made him the 'keeper'.
|
|
|
Fri, 31 Dec 2004 - 10:41
Post
#45
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 71 Joined: 16 Feb 2004 From: Northampton Member No.: 893 |
Hi everyone,
After much wrangling with Humberside CPS over confirmation of driver ( I was in Sainsburys about an hour before the alleged offence which was at least 2 hours if not longer drive away) & a side order of out of time NIP I was summonsed for speeding & 172. Due to appear in court in Jan 2005, armed with erroneous statements from the CPS clerk, Mohindra & a statement from the police officer that he 'formed an opinion...' etc etc dated sometime in June 2004. (The alleged offence was in Dec 2003). Today I have had a notice of discontinuance for both charges on grounds of there not being enough evidence to secure conviction. Merry Christmas RSW!!! I would like to extend my grateful thanks to all the guys here in Pepipoo whose forum has helped me to have the courage & knowledge to fight the scameraship. Whenever I started feeling down or wavered in the fight I visited the forum and there always something or someone there to bolster my flagging spirits. And as a direct result of visiting this site I have been able to help one or two others in their fights as well. Merry Christmas & Happy New Year to you all. RSW |
|
|
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 - 02:13
Post
#46
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 8,639 Joined: 5 Jul 2003 Member No.: 134 |
dvhttn, another sub-section (4). Didn't get to summons.
|
|
|
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 - 00:52
Post
#47
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 8,639 Joined: 5 Jul 2003 Member No.: 134 |
Mickey P, PACE letter time-out.
|
|
|
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 - 16:59
Post
#48
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 547 Joined: 17 Apr 2004 From: Somerset, near where they make choppers Member No.: 1,108 |
I have had no further communication with Hampshire scameraship and the offence timed out back in October. the mags. have nothing listed in my name or for my address so I guess we had better chalk another one up in the success column.
(Will link my thread when I find it...) -------------------- The Police ARE The Law, Not ABOVE It...
|
|
|
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 - 00:59
Post
#49
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 8,639 Joined: 5 Jul 2003 Member No.: 134 |
Dee's case; fitted up by Essex Traffic.
|
|
|
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 - 15:45
Post
#50
|
|
Member Group: Administrators Posts: 9,760 Joined: 30 Mar 2003 From: Wiltshire, UK Member No.: 4 |
We received the following message today :
“Dear PePiPoo, You might remember I wrote to you last year about the NIP I received (details below). Well, I asked Robert Dobson to represent me, on your advice, and the other day he rang to tell me that Lincolnshire Police had dropped all the charges, a week before the court case! What had happened was, I'd explained to them (via Robert) that as I was pregnant at the time of the alleged offence, my husband and I swapped over the driving very regularly because I got uncomfortable either driving or being a passenger for too long. This didn't seem to cut any ice, and they continued to say they were taking me to court. Shortly before the date of the court case, they sent copies of the photographs the speed camera took to Robert. He forwarded them to me, and I could clearly see a hand on the steering wheel in the photographs, and a glint of metal on that hand that I knew was a wedding ring. I then wrote back to them to say that if they enlarged the photo and enhanced it, I would definitely be able to identify the driver because my husband and I wear very different types of wedding ring. They wrote back to say that they would not do that, and so Robert pointed out to them that I had surely now done everything I could to show 'reasonable diligence' in identifying the driver, as I was under no obligation to furnish them with this detail about mine and my husband's rings. Anyway, a long and bizarre story, but perhaps one that might be of interest to your website visitors, especially ones who wear different kinds of wedding rings from their spouses! Thanks again for your help! All the best,” -------------------- Regards, Mika
Useful Info: 1 Read This First 2. 14-day Rule; 3. 6-month Rule. 4. NIP Wizard. 5. Success Stories. |
|
|
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 - 20:58
Post
#51
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 79 Joined: 27 Jul 2004 Member No.: 1,458 |
Offence date 12 June 2004
Original Reply PACE witness statement followed by Right To Silence letter, so I reckon that is one that has now timed out Chalk another one up to justice Now all I 've got to beat is the Scottish legal system and that'd be mondeoman 2 - scammers 0 |
|
|
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 - 08:55
Post
#52
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 4,714 Joined: 3 Sep 2003 From: ex-Scotland Member No.: 298 |
doublej's victory at Birmingham Magistrates' Court.
Yorke compliant unsigned form; speeding only. More details here. -------------------- Regards,
ff Benefitted from PePiPoo? Useful Info: 1 Read This First 2. 14-day Rule; 3. 6-month Rule. 4. NIP Wizard. 5. Success Stories. |
|
|
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 - 01:26
Post
#53
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 8,639 Joined: 5 Jul 2003 Member No.: 134 |
Taxexile, another sub-section (4). Not even any B&Bs.
|
|
|
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 - 01:08
Post
#54
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 98 Joined: 17 Jun 2004 Member No.: 1,319 |
Alleged offence of speeding on 17th June 2004.
Replied to first NIP using PACE statement. Received some B&B and two reminders, all of which I ignored. Heard nothing since. Thanks guys. D. PS: Suitable donation on its way to Fighting Fund next payday :wink: -------------------- Cheers
D. |
|
|
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 - 14:53
Post
#55
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 1,749 Joined: 18 Mar 2004 From: Strasbourg (soon) Member No.: 1,017 |
Alexander TG Won his case after quoting Mohindra v DPP He was also Yorke compliant
Another one for the success stories which seemed to have been missed 8) cheers, matt -------------------- Help Fund The Fight:
Click Here To Join The Member's Forum Via PayPal! or Click Here To Donate As Every Little Helps |
|
|
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 - 15:01
Post
#56
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 1,749 Joined: 18 Mar 2004 From: Strasbourg (soon) Member No.: 1,017 |
Rosewell Won his case
he was defending both speeding and S172. Speeding dismissed due to inacuracies i.e wrong direction of travel for alleged offence, non disclosure of documents previously promised etc, and radar could have interfered with reading of camera. S172 dismissed as the allegation was that NO reply was received, however a reply was sent by Rosewell, albeit unsigned. cheers, matt -------------------- Help Fund The Fight:
Click Here To Join The Member's Forum Via PayPal! or Click Here To Donate As Every Little Helps |
|
|
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 - 15:17
Post
#57
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 1,749 Joined: 18 Mar 2004 From: Strasbourg (soon) Member No.: 1,017 |
Jim_Beam did the double too by successfully defending both speeding and S172 charges due to a 'lost file', an entertaining post.
cheers, matt -------------------- Help Fund The Fight:
Click Here To Join The Member's Forum Via PayPal! or Click Here To Donate As Every Little Helps |
|
|
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 - 15:29
Post
#58
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 1,749 Joined: 18 Mar 2004 From: Strasbourg (soon) Member No.: 1,017 |
John Josephs successfully defended his clients three time in one day on the charge of S172 for each at Leicester Mags Court, top brief.
the allegations were that no replies were received, when infact they WERE sent, albeit unsigned. cheers, matt -------------------- Help Fund The Fight:
Click Here To Join The Member's Forum Via PayPal! or Click Here To Donate As Every Little Helps |
|
|
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 - 15:31
Post
#59
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 1,749 Joined: 18 Mar 2004 From: Strasbourg (soon) Member No.: 1,017 |
As above, Karlsberg was alleged to have not responded to the NIP, he infact did without a signiture though. the case was dropped at Witney Mags Court.
cheers, matt -------------------- Help Fund The Fight:
Click Here To Join The Member's Forum Via PayPal! or Click Here To Donate As Every Little Helps |
|
|
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 - 00:42
Post
#60
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 8,639 Joined: 5 Jul 2003 Member No.: 134 |
scottish, another sub-section (4). He appears to have been named as the driver by his company. Didn't get to summons.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Friday, 29th March 2024 - 11:28 |