How did this even get to tribunal?, Police to review tests for dog handlers to avoid discrimination Options

[Unzippy]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/12...discrimination/

It’s not discrimination based on sex, it’s based on strength and fitness.
Jobs have person specifications for a reason. The suitability is hard because it very loosely replicates what is required in the job. If you can't lift a 35 kilo dog over fences and cover terrain that's nasty, shitty, rough, then deal with a suspect who wants to fight you at the end of it all then this job isn’t for you.

[Advertisement]

[Fredd]

Care to share the source?

Google is quite the tool...

http://batsby.blogspot.com.au/2018/01/to-h...olitics-of.html

Perhaps I was being too subtle. If you're going to regurgitate a swathe of text, from a far-right blog in this case, then the least you could do is provide some attribution so that people can decide for themselves how much credence they should give to the author's views.

[Unzippy]

There you go then, tidy lesson in art of sublety.
Hope it was an easy one!

[oldstoat]

Care to share the source?

Google is quite the tool...

http://batsby.blogspot.com.au/2018/01/to-h...olitics-of.html

Perhaps I was being too subtle. If you're going to regurgitate a swathe of text, from a far-right blog in this case, then the least you could do is provide some attribution so that people can decide for themselves how much credence they should give to the author's views.

far right crikey how do you work that out.

[Fredd]

Have you read any of it, beyond that one post? Unless it's supposed to be satirical and I missed the humour, then I'd say approval of eugenics and anti-Muslim posts illustrated by pictures of burkha-wearing women would be a fair indicator for a start.