NTK - MET - Penalty charge |
Helping the motorist get justice 
Helping the motorist get justice
NTK - MET - Penalty charge |
 Mon, 11 Feb 2019 - 13:39
Post
#1
|
||
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 55 Joined: 29 Mar 2011 Member No.: 45,511  |
Good Afternoon,
An invoice from our good old friends at MET. Notice to keeper received ( Parking - No valid ticket, voucher, permit) Not much to say on this one apart from not sent to the driver  Please could someone kindly provide me with the link for wording as not to the driver. Would this be ok on this one? Cheers This post has been edited by Coatze: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 - 13:51
Attached thumbnail(s)
|
|
 |
 
|
|
 |
|
Mon, 11 Feb 2019 - 13:53
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 28,687 Joined: 27 Nov 2007 Member No.: 15,642 |
In order for "not the driver" to be important, you need to check that this NtK doesnt meet POFA2012, para 9 (assuming no windscreen ticket)
|
|
|
|
|
Mon, 11 Feb 2019 - 13:56
Post
#3
|
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 55 Joined: 29 Mar 2011 Member No.: 45,511 |
QUOTE (nosferatu1001 @ Mon, 11 Feb 2019 - 13:53)  In order for "not the driver" to be important, you need to check that this NtK doesnt meet POFA2012, para 9 (assuming no windscreen ticket) Hi correct no windscreen ticket, letter by post only. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
Mon, 11 Feb 2019 - 14:15
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 28,687 Joined: 27 Nov 2007 Member No.: 15,642 |
QUOTE (Coatze @ Mon, 11 Feb 2019 - 14:56) QUOTE (nosferatu1001 @ Mon, 11 Feb 2019 - 13:53) In order for "not the driver" to be important, you need to check that this NtK doesnt meet POFA2012, para 9 (assuming no windscreen ticket) Hi correct no windscreen ticket, letter by post only. Thanks Yes, so you need to do your own work here - does it meet the STRICT reqiurements of POFA? Yes or No? We dont do this for you |
|
|
|
|
Tue, 12 Feb 2019 - 08:40
Post
#5
|
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 55 Joined: 29 Mar 2011 Member No.: 45,511 |
QUOTE (nosferatu1001 @ Mon, 11 Feb 2019 - 14:15) QUOTE (Coatze @ Mon, 11 Feb 2019 - 14:56) QUOTE (nosferatu1001 @ Mon, 11 Feb 2019 - 13:53) In order for "not the driver" to be important, you need to check that this NtK doesnt meet POFA2012, para 9 (assuming no windscreen ticket) Hi correct no windscreen ticket, letter by post only. Thanks Yes, so you need to do your own work here - does it meet the STRICT reqiurements of POFA? Yes or No? We dont do this for you Hi yes I looked at POFA once you had advised. I replied to your assumption of no windscreen ticket. thanks QUOTE (ostell @ Mon, 11 Feb 2019 - 21:34) Here's a link to POFA Unless it's on the back I spotted 2 failures on the front without effort Hi, can you please advise me? I have looked at the POFA information. I was after help on this if you could point me to the right direction please |
|
|
|
Coatze NTK - MET - Penalty charge Mon, 11 Feb 2019 - 13:39
Ollyfrog With only the front of the notice we can't see... Mon, 11 Feb 2019 - 14:07 ostell Here's a link to POFA Unless it's on the b... Mon, 11 Feb 2019 - 21:34 ostell 3 failures: 9 (2) (a) period of parking, 9 (2) (f... Tue, 12 Feb 2019 - 10:08 Coatze Thanks for the reply and the direction where to fi... Tue, 12 Feb 2019 - 10:31 ostell That letter I gave is sufficient for the time bein... Tue, 12 Feb 2019 - 10:34
Coatze Thankyou again! I looked at the back of the NT... Tue, 12 Feb 2019 - 13:01 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Tuesday, 16th April 2024 - 07:54 |
