Unloading Claim Rejected |
Unloading Claim Rejected |
Tue, 28 May 2019 - 07:24
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 220 Joined: 30 Apr 2008 Member No.: 19,194 |
Hi All,
One of our vans got ticketed whilst unloading on non-restricted double yellow lines. We appealed with supporting evidence but this got rejected because the van was near a junction. Can anyone see anything incorrect about the council's letter before we pay? Cheers. |
|
|
Mon, 29 Jul 2019 - 08:46
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 35,065 Joined: 2 Aug 2008 From: Woking Member No.: 21,551 |
The first of the two posted letters seems clear: it is addressed to Plymouth City Council and it is signed by LeasePlan. There is nothing to suggest this has not been sent to the council. And here is the problem: it is unclear. You think it's been sent to the OP, I don't. But whichever, the OP must find out or possibly lose by default.
I suggested he started with LeasePlan for the very obvious reason that the ball is in their court. They could phone them, in fact this might be preferable. All they need to establish is exactly what LeasePlan have sent to the council e.g. only the letter dated 18th, nothing! It's simple fact finding and should be dealt with as such i.e. no 'overtones'. And once they and we know, then we can advise. For example, if only the letter then we know that this does not comply with the regs as regards transferring liability, but the OP doesn't want to split hairs on this point at the moment, what they want is a NTO in their name. So, do the authority intend to accept this, what else might they need, could the OP assist etc? But I think this must start with LeasePlan with a light touch. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Friday, 29th March 2024 - 12:00 |