POPLA & IPC table of successful appeal, Any data? |
POPLA & IPC table of successful appeal, Any data? |
Tue, 4 Aug 2020 - 08:25
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 8,582 Joined: 9 Feb 2006 Member No.: 4,813 |
has any data been released on the successful appeals allowed against each PPC.
-------------------- The Asda shopping trolley parking ticket enthusiast
|
|
|
Advertisement |
Tue, 4 Aug 2020 - 08:25
Post
#
|
Advertise here! |
|
|
|
Tue, 4 Aug 2020 - 08:30
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 41,505 Joined: 25 Aug 2011 From: Planet Earth Member No.: 49,223 |
-------------------- RK=Registered Keeper, OP=Original Poster (You!), CoFP=Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty, NtK=Notice to Keeper, NtD=Notice to Driver
PoFA=Protection of Freedoms Act, SAC=Safety Awareness Course, NIP=Notice of Intended Prosecution, ADR=Alternative Dispute Resolution PPC=Private Parking Company, LBCCC=Letter Before County Court Claim, PII=Personally Identifiable Information, SAR=Subject Access Request Private Parking - remember, they just want your money and will say almost anything to get it. |
|
|
Tue, 4 Aug 2020 - 08:58
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 56,198 Joined: 9 Sep 2003 From: Warwickshire Member No.: 317 |
So for the BPA/PoPLA Operators drop circa 25% of cases and then PoPLA upholds circa 25% of the cases they adjudicate on
For the IPC/IAS Operators drop circa 21% of cases (OK that's close enough to be considered 'similar') but the IAS upholds just 5% of the cases they adjudicate on. Either the IPC members are brilliant at making sure all their cases are watertight (do stop laughing at the back), or the IAS is heavily biased towards the operators. Where is the DVLA in looking at this massive discrepancy with respect to their ATA status? -------------------- There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!
S172's Rookies 1-0 Kent Council PCN's Rookies 1-0 Warwick Rookies 1-0 Birmingham PPC PCN's Rookies 10-0 PPC's |
|
|
Tue, 4 Aug 2020 - 10:31
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 41,505 Joined: 25 Aug 2011 From: Planet Earth Member No.: 49,223 |
Where is the DVLA in looking at this massive discrepancy with respect to their ATA status? They are busy trying to resolve the loss they make from each data request. -------------------- RK=Registered Keeper, OP=Original Poster (You!), CoFP=Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty, NtK=Notice to Keeper, NtD=Notice to Driver
PoFA=Protection of Freedoms Act, SAC=Safety Awareness Course, NIP=Notice of Intended Prosecution, ADR=Alternative Dispute Resolution PPC=Private Parking Company, LBCCC=Letter Before County Court Claim, PII=Personally Identifiable Information, SAR=Subject Access Request Private Parking - remember, they just want your money and will say almost anything to get it. |
|
|
Tue, 4 Aug 2020 - 11:39
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 56,198 Joined: 9 Sep 2003 From: Warwickshire Member No.: 317 |
Where is the DVLA in looking at this massive discrepancy with respect to their ATA status? They are busy trying to resolve the loss they make from each data request. Removing access from all IPC members would surely help then! Two birds with one stone! This post has been edited by The Rookie: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 - 11:42 -------------------- There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!
S172's Rookies 1-0 Kent Council PCN's Rookies 1-0 Warwick Rookies 1-0 Birmingham PPC PCN's Rookies 10-0 PPC's |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 15:09 |