PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Yellow box junction cctv ticket, Box junction
Bach
post Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 21:19
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Member No.: 90,268



Hi again

I received a ticket through the post a few weeks ago.

I stopped in a box junction.

I viewed the cctv footage today. I stopped to give way to a vehicle pulling out of the side road, that vehicle then took the vacant space I was going to drive into if I didn't give him way.

I was in the box junction but I didn't actually block the flow of traffic, no cars were turning into the road I had blocked.

Thanks in advance guys











This post has been edited by Bach: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 21:20
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 19)
Advertisement
post Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 21:19
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
PASTMYBEST
post Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 21:27
Post #2


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 26,656
Joined: 6 Nov 2014
Member No.: 74,048



What is the date of notice?


--------------------
All advice is given freely. It is given without guarantee and responsibility for its use rests with the user
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DancingDad
post Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 21:46
Post #3


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 25,726
Joined: 28 Jun 2010
From: Area 51
Member No.: 38,559



Hmmmm
Stopping is not the contravention
Stopping due to stationary traffic is.

While there seems no question that there was a space when you entered the box and that you stopped from choice, not necessity, I'm wondering how an adjudicator would decide on you remaining stationary??
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stamfordman
post Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 22:13
Post #4


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23,582
Joined: 12 Feb 2013
From: London
Member No.: 59,924



The car that pulled out also stopped with clear space ahead - this should be a factor as you are entitled to look further ahead when judging a box.

Do you have the video or did you have to go to their office?

This post has been edited by stamfordman: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 22:20
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
peterguk
post Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 22:26
Post #5


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 13,735
Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Member No.: 14,720



QUOTE (stamfordman @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 22:13) *
The car that pulled out also stopped with clear space ahead


How can you tell from a single photo?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bach
post Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:00
Post #6


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Member No.: 90,268



QUOTE (PASTMYBEST @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 21:27) *
What is the date of notice?


08/02/2017, I had an appointment today to view the footage

QUOTE (DancingDad @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 21:46) *
Hmmmm
Stopping is not the contravention
Stopping due to stationary traffic is.

While there seems no question that there was a space when you entered the box and that you stopped from choice, not necessity, I'm wondering how an adjudicator would decide on you remaining stationary??


Traffic was moving when I entered the box junction, it definitely wasn't stationary.

Thanks


QUOTE (stamfordman @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 22:13) *
The car that pulled out also stopped with clear space ahead - this should be a factor as you are entitled to look further ahead when judging a box.

Do you have the video or did you have to go to their office?


I went to their office today, they wouldn't allow me to record the footage
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stamfordman
post Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:00
Post #7


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23,582
Joined: 12 Feb 2013
From: London
Member No.: 59,924



QUOTE (peterguk @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 22:26) *
QUOTE (stamfordman @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 22:13) *
The car that pulled out also stopped with clear space ahead


How can you tell from a single photo?



I can't - but if that car had continued down the empty lane then the OP had an empty lane to drive into...

I suspect the OP like many drivers was rooted in staying in their lane and not getting out of the box. Looks like the right lane is a right turn lane but better to be in that than in the box...

This post has been edited by stamfordman: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:01
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DancingDad
post Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:00
Post #8


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 25,726
Joined: 28 Jun 2010
From: Area 51
Member No.: 38,559



QUOTE (Bach @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 22:57) *
...........Traffic was moving when I entered the box junction, it definitely wasn't stationary.

Thanks


It isn't a case that traffic was moving, it is whether or not there was a clear exit when you entered.
Then whether you stopped due to stationary traffic.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bach
post Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:04
Post #9


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Member No.: 90,268



QUOTE (stamfordman @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:00) *
QUOTE (peterguk @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 22:26) *
QUOTE (stamfordman @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 22:13) *
The car that pulled out also stopped with clear space ahead


How can you tell from a single photo?



I can't - but if that car had continued down the empty lane then the OP had an empty lane to drive into...

I suspect the OP like many drivers was rooted in staying in their lane and not getting out of the box. Looks like the right lane is a right turn lane but better to be in that than in the box...


In the cctv footage, it showed a few cars build up in front of the white van I gave way to. I couldn't tell what the build up was due to to the camera didn't show that angle.

This post has been edited by Bach: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:16
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stamfordman
post Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:12
Post #10


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23,582
Joined: 12 Feb 2013
From: London
Member No.: 59,924



QUOTE (Bach @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:04) *
QUOTE (stamfordman @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:00) *
QUOTE (peterguk @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 22:26) *
QUOTE (stamfordman @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 22:13) *
The car that pulled out also stopped with clear space ahead


How can you tell from a single photo?



I can't - but if that car had continued down the empty lane then the OP had an empty lane to drive into...

I suspect the OP like many drivers was rooted in staying in their lane and not getting out of the box. Looks like the right lane is a right turn lane but better to be in that than in the box...


In the cctv footage, it showed a few cars build up in front of the white van I gave way to. I couldn't tell what the build up was due to as the camera didn't show that angle.


Ah it was the van - I assumed the small car turning into the right lane. As I said, you should have driven into the right lane rather than stop. Raises the question as to whether an adjudicator would ignore the empty right lane and consider only the merits of your left lane space being taken. Or you could say your exit was not blocked as the right lane was clear...



This post has been edited by stamfordman: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:21
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bach
post Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:19
Post #11


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Member No.: 90,268



QUOTE (stamfordman @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:12) *
QUOTE (Bach @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:04) *
QUOTE (stamfordman @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:00) *
QUOTE (peterguk @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 22:26) *
QUOTE (stamfordman @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 22:13) *
The car that pulled out also stopped with clear space ahead


How can you tell from a single photo?



I can't - but if that car had continued down the empty lane then the OP had an empty lane to drive into...

I suspect the OP like many drivers was rooted in staying in their lane and not getting out of the box. Looks like the right lane is a right turn lane but better to be in that than in the box...


In the cctv footage, it showed a few cars build up in front of the white van I gave way to. I couldn't tell what the build up was due to as the camera didn't show that angle.


Ah it was the van - I assumed the small car turning into the right lane. As I said, you should have driven into the right lane rather than stop. Raises the question as to whether an adjudicator would ignore the empty right lane and consider only the merits of your left lane space being taken. Or you could say your exit was not blocked as the right lane was clear...


Yeah, it was the van. Sorry, should've mentioned it earlier.

If I say my exit wasn't blocked as the right lane was clear, how would that help me?


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stamfordman
post Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:24
Post #12


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23,582
Joined: 12 Feb 2013
From: London
Member No.: 59,924



QUOTE (Bach @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:19) *
Yeah, it was the van. Sorry, should've mentioned it earlier.

If I say my exit wasn't blocked as the right lane was clear, how would that help me?


I'm not sure - hopefully we can ignore the right lane and just focus on your space being taken on the left.

To be fair the right lane is marked as a right turn but it's not compulsory:

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.5706811,0...#33;6m1!1e1

The idea though is that the contravention only occurs if your exit is blocked by stationary vehicles, as DD says. Technically you had an exit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bach
post Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:40
Post #13


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Member No.: 90,268



QUOTE (stamfordman @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:24) *
QUOTE (Bach @ Fri, 17 Mar 2017 - 23:19) *
Yeah, it was the van. Sorry, should've mentioned it earlier.

If I say my exit wasn't blocked as the right lane was clear, how would that help me?


I'm not sure - hopefully we can ignore the right lane and just focus on your space being taken on the left.

To be fair the right lane is marked as a right turn but it's not compulsory:

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.5706811,0...#33;6m1!1e1

The idea though is that the contravention only occurs if your exit is blocked by stationary vehicles, as DD says. Technically you had an exit.


Ok great, so at least I've got a leg to stand on.

And I was just making myself seem like a nice driver when saying " I gave the van driver way" biggrin.gif

I honestly can't remember whether I gave him way or he pulled out.

I'm guessing my case would be that bit stronger if he pulled out in front of me, taking the slave I was driving towards
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Incandescent
post Sat, 18 Mar 2017 - 10:15
Post #14


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 21,009
Joined: 22 Apr 2012
Member No.: 54,455



An adjudicator will consider why, having given way to the van, you drove into the box, or where you already in it ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
astralite
post Sat, 18 Mar 2017 - 10:34
Post #15


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 2,342
Joined: 10 Mar 2014
Member No.: 69,352



Unfortunately it’s most unlikely that the argument that there was ‘space in another lane’ would prevail. I don’t have the adjudication references to hand but will try to post them later.
It’s very poor of them not to allow you a recording as the video is the essential evidence and it’s almost impossible to assess and come to a view without studying it, often playing it several times. I’d ask them in writing to send you a DVD copy.

What is the date on the PCN?
How long were you stopped?
I’m also thinking maybe inadequate description of the location as it’s a long road.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bach
post Sat, 18 Mar 2017 - 17:33
Post #16


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Member No.: 90,268



QUOTE (Incandescent @ Sat, 18 Mar 2017 - 10:15) *
An adjudicator will consider why, having given way to the van, you drove into the box, or where you already in it ?


I can't remember if I was in the box when the van pulled out.

If the buggers let me record the footage, I could've looked back to it.

I'm not sure what to do now


QUOTE (astralite @ Sat, 18 Mar 2017 - 10:34) *
Unfortunately it’s most unlikely that the argument that there was ‘space in another lane’ would prevail. I don’t have the adjudication references to hand but will try to post them later.
It’s very poor of them not to allow you a recording as the video is the essential evidence and it’s almost impossible to assess and come to a view without studying it, often playing it several times. I’d ask them in writing to send you a DVD copy.

What is the date on the PCN?
How long were you stopped?
I’m also thinking maybe inadequate description of the location as it’s a long road.


I know, it's terrible that they didn't allow me to record off the screen, especially if they don't give copies.

I have 10 days to appeal from the 16th (when I viewed the footage) so my appeal has to be in by 26 March

I was stopped for 14 seconds,

The date on the ticket is 08 Feb 2017.

The location is, Chadwell heath high rd, Romford, where it meets Chadwell heath lane

Thanks
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PASTMYBEST
post Sat, 18 Mar 2017 - 18:07
Post #17


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 26,656
Joined: 6 Nov 2014
Member No.: 74,048



Only you have seen the video, so only you know what happened.

if there was a space on the left you could have moved into, but the van came from the side road and took it you would likely win as you did not stop in the box due to stationary traffic


--------------------
All advice is given freely. It is given without guarantee and responsibility for its use rests with the user
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bach
post Sat, 18 Mar 2017 - 18:23
Post #18


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Member No.: 90,268



QUOTE (PASTMYBEST @ Sat, 18 Mar 2017 - 18:07) *
Only you have seen the video, so only you know what happened.

if there was a space on the left you could have moved into, but the van came from the side road and took it you would likely win as you did not stop in the box due to stationary traffic


Yrs that was the case, the van pulled out and took the space I was going to drive into.

I'll put that in the appeal

Cheers
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hippocrates
post Sat, 18 Mar 2017 - 18:47
Post #19


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 9,876
Joined: 20 Mar 2012
Member No.: 53,821



Please show the whole PCN.


--------------------
There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know.

Donald Rumsfeld

There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends PATAS, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know.

"Hippocrates"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bach
post Sat, 18 Mar 2017 - 20:20
Post #20


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Member No.: 90,268



QUOTE (Hippocrates @ Sat, 18 Mar 2017 - 18:47) *
Please show the whole PCN.


Here you go mate


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Tuesday, 16th April 2024 - 04:37
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here