PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

185 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 

Bluedart
Posted on: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 - 03:29


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (triumph-rules @ Wed, 14 Sep 2016 - 22:12) *
Do as I am. I appealed to the ppc and told,them to stop processing my data they had unlawfully obtained and to remove it. They didn't. I got popla code and appealed on many points. Popla agreed with my appeal on first point of non PoFA compliance. I am now in process of small claims for £940 for pecuniary and non pecuniary damages and damages for distress. Using latest Supreme Court ruling as basis, and alleging that reasonable cause not defined so arbitrary and against HRA, and breach of DPA by the ppc. Worth the 55 quid just to try nail them


And very, very, good luck to you!
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1212070 · Replies: 24 · Views: 6,322

Bluedart
Posted on: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 - 14:11


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (Keepitlegal @ Wed, 14 Sep 2016 - 10:16) *
I am seriously considering taking a PPC to task over a wrongly alleged PCN.
I believe they are not meeting the requirements of POFA, I have not broken 'the contract' (blue badge holders park for free, this is what the sign actually says! and I was displaying a blue badge) meaning the DVLA have possibly broken the DPA by supplying my details as the registered keeper.
My action would involve enlisting the help of MP.
The reason for taking this stance.... A neighbour recently paid a PCN because she didn't have the time and couldn't be bothered to contest the ticket, plus she would qualify for a 50% reduction. I wonder just how many people think as she did?
So, what are my chances of seeing changes made to parking on private land?
Thanks

QUOTE
I wonder just how many people think as she did?
More that you care to imagine.
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1211901 · Replies: 24 · Views: 6,322

Bluedart
Posted on: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 - 14:08


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (Keepitlegal @ Wed, 14 Sep 2016 - 10:16) *
I am seriously considering taking a PPC to task over a wrongly alleged PCN.
I believe they are not meeting the requirements of POFA, I have not broken 'the contract' (blue badge holders park for free, this is what the sign actually says! and I was displaying a blue badge) meaning the DVLA have possibly broken the DPA by supplying my details as the registered keeper.
My action would involve enlisting the help of MP.
The reason for taking this stance.... A neighbour recently paid a PCN because she didn't have the time and couldn't be bothered to contest the ticket, plus she would qualify for a 50% reduction. I wonder just how many people think as she did?
So, what are my chances of seeing changes made to parking on private land?
Thanks


QUOTE
I wonder just how many people think as she did?
More than you care to imagine and therein lies the problem. That is why the carrot is used by offering a 50% reduction if you pay promptly.
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1211899 · Replies: 24 · Views: 6,322

Bluedart
Posted on: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 - 20:00


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (southpaw82 @ Mon, 12 Sep 2016 - 20:52) *
QUOTE (Bluedart @ Mon, 12 Sep 2016 - 20:30) *
QUOTE (andy_foster @ Mon, 12 Sep 2016 - 15:47) *
This has nothing to do with motoring/traffic legal issues, but it is in the Flame Pit - which is for off-topic discussions.

A long-term member of the site has a non-motoring legal issue and asked for advice in the Flame Pit.

Your issue here appears to be not about that this thread, but the fact that the mods closed one of your threads in which you posted an utterly untrue statement about some authority somewhere taking a stand against what is perceived by many to be a policy of suppressing the truth about Muslims.


If that is the case and the flame pit is for any other topic, then why have they locked, blocked or removed some of the topics I have brought to the attention for others to make up their own mind as to whether or not it is a load of bollocks and not for others to make the decisions for them? Education, education, education. You cannot educate anyone if they are not given the opportunity to be educated.

“One child, one teacher, one book, one pen can change the world.” And you all know who uttered those words.

It's a private site and reserves the right to remove anything for any, or no, reason. Your constant carping about that is becoming tedious.

It may become tedious to you, but others may have a different view which I can see you simply do not understand.
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1211346 · Replies: 23 · Views: 4,278

Bluedart
Posted on: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 - 19:30


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (andy_foster @ Mon, 12 Sep 2016 - 15:47) *
This has nothing to do with motoring/traffic legal issues, but it is in the Flame Pit - which is for off-topic discussions.

A long-term member of the site has a non-motoring legal issue and asked for advice in the Flame Pit.

Your issue here appears to be not about that this thread, but the fact that the mods closed one of your threads in which you posted an utterly untrue statement about some authority somewhere taking a stand against what is perceived by many to be a policy of suppressing the truth about Muslims.


If that is the case and the flame pit is for any other topic, then why have they locked, blocked or removed some of the topics I have brought to the attention for others to make up their own mind as to whether or not it is a load of bollocks and not for others to make the decisions for them? Education, education, education. You cannot educate anyone if they are not given the opportunity to be educated.

“One child, one teacher, one book, one pen can change the world.” And you all know who uttered those words.
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1211335 · Replies: 23 · Views: 4,278

Bluedart
Posted on: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 - 14:34


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388



This is post 13 and what has this topic got to do with motoring/traffic problems?
Shows what minds the mods have to allow this space.
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1211238 · Replies: 23 · Views: 4,278

Bluedart
Posted on: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 - 00:34


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388



The law is the law is the law. No it isn't, judges ignore the law and make there own. Who's fault is it that a PRESCRIBED sign has not been used? Local authorities have oodles of our money to do things correctly, whose fault is it when they fail? Councillors are a waste of space, but they will always be there with nothing to say, yet they are the only ones who act on your behalf. Rant over.
  Forum: Council Tickets & Clamping and Decriminalis... · Post Preview: #1202028 · Replies: 16 · Views: 1,407

Bluedart
Posted on: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 - 19:30


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (Dracos1985 @ Fri, 12 Aug 2016 - 20:23) *
I am hoping you can help!

In September 2015 I deliberately parked on a double yellow line that I knew to be unenforcable due to a 2-3 meter long break in the lines rendering the whole line invalid. Naturally, all of the Bristol City Council direct appeals were rejected (of course they were!), which left me to deal with the TPT. Having historically had 2 previous tickets overturned by TPT I believed this would be a simple formality again. Not so. unsure.gif

I have currently exhausted all of my cost free appeals for this parking ticket and I am 99.9% sure I am in the right. Having been through the appeals process with the TPT which was rejected, and then the subsequent appeal which was also rejected, my next step is a Judicial Review. As this is finally now at the point where it is going to start costing me considerable money to fight - a fight I do not wish to pursue if I am in the wrong - I am looking for a little support or definition as to whether I am correct to push this. That said, I am a very principled person, and if i am in the right like i believe I am, I am prepared to take this a far as it needs to be. ninja.gif

I have used information from other posts on this forum as part of my appeals @ http://www.pepipoo.com/forums/lofiversion/...php/t10941.html & http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=25981

I enclose all of the evidence from the TPT reviewon my Dropbox which hopefully includes everything you need to advise me on whether the fight is valid or not. you can download the evidence zip file (23MB) @ EVIDENCE

Please help! crybaby2.gif

Aaron


Personally, it is my opinion, you haven't got a cat in hells chance!
  Forum: Council Tickets & Clamping and Decriminalis... · Post Preview: #1201942 · Replies: 16 · Views: 1,407

Bluedart
Posted on: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 - 20:00


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (cabbyman @ Wed, 10 Aug 2016 - 00:26) *
Sorry, that pdf is unreadable.

Also, why not hit the 'report' button and get this into the right forum?


What part is unreadable and what forum would you suggest?
  Forum: Private Parking Tickets & Clamping · Post Preview: #1201064 · Replies: 12 · Views: 1,493

Bluedart
Posted on: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 - 15:53


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (D P Dance @ Wed, 10 Aug 2016 - 16:32) *

I have just received a PCN from Reading Borough Council for parking in a Resident's space without displaying a valid permit. The space was immediately next to a disabled entrance to RBH Diabetes Centre; valid Blue Badge was correctly displayed, along with a clock.

It is an affluent area and residents have no need for subsidised parking, and there are no dedicated disabled spaces in the area. At the very least the CPO should have exercised his/her discretion. , and walked by on the other side of the road.

I have written to the Council them asking them to cancel this as I have a protected characteristic under EA 2010, I cannot walk very far, and I am confident that they will. However, as Council Tax payer, I am concerned that this was issued in the first place. It is my understanding that Councils have discretion whether to allow BB parking in Residents' bays, and I see no reason why this should not be the case here as there were no dedicated BB spaces in the area.

Reading has very low unemployment, and most of the bays are unused during working hours.
I see no reason why BB holders should not be allowed to park here, and, whether this is cancelled or not, I shall be taking this up with my local councillor.

Please note I am not asking for advice here, but opinions on the matter which I have raised


QUOTE
It is an affluent area and residents have no need for subsidised parking,
That is not correct. It is a measure local authorities use to displace parking for all of us.
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1200953 · Replies: 84 · Views: 11,907

Bluedart
Posted on: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 - 21:11


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (bama @ Tue, 9 Aug 2016 - 21:52) *
and that ANPR time is not equal to parking time.


Can you expand?? And for those interested, this is the latest terms and conditions.

Attached File  The_notice_1.pdf ( 304.17K ) Number of downloads: 170
  Forum: Private Parking Tickets & Clamping · Post Preview: #1200697 · Replies: 12 · Views: 1,493

Bluedart
Posted on: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 - 20:44


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (cabbyman @ Tue, 9 Aug 2016 - 19:52) *


Thanks thus far pictures are excellent but, things must have change since then as it is said, "smart parking) do not do popla, yet on the ticket I have it has this to say, "For Parking Charge Niotices issued for a breach of parking terms and conditions on private land in England and Wales on or after 1st October 2012 an independent Adjudication Service (POPLA) is available if we object your appeal.

My friend was over 16mins late leaving the site as he could not get out.
The date of contravention was 29th July 2016, he had a 27ft camper van, he was blocked in by other vehicles. Whilst there was room for smaller vehicles to get out, he couldn't, until the vehicle in front or behind moved. On this date it was very busy.
  Forum: Private Parking Tickets & Clamping · Post Preview: #1200687 · Replies: 12 · Views: 1,493

Bluedart
Posted on: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 - 18:50


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


Does anyone happen to have a picture of the parking sign at the ar park at Fistral Beach, Newquay, Cornwall?
  Forum: Private Parking Tickets & Clamping · Post Preview: #1200632 · Replies: 12 · Views: 1,493

Bluedart
Posted on: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 - 18:45


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (stamfordman @ Tue, 9 Aug 2016 - 13:04) *
Say you like to get organised but sometimes run ahead of yourself somewhat.


Why did he get a ticket?
  Forum: Council Tickets & Clamping and Decriminalis... · Post Preview: #1200626 · Replies: 8 · Views: 911

Bluedart
Posted on: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 - 11:51


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (nosferatu1001 @ Tue, 9 Aug 2016 - 11:57) *
Yes, an informal appeal - honest mistake, please show discretion in cancelling, etc.


Any dimwit could see it is a mistake. But that is not dimwits game.
  Forum: Council Tickets & Clamping and Decriminalis... · Post Preview: #1200458 · Replies: 8 · Views: 911

Bluedart
Posted on: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 - 10:21


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388



I will chip in with my two penny worth and use the quote from DancingDad.

QUOTE
I was always taught the right side to overtake was past the right hand side of the vehicle.
And that is how I was taught and those that undertake, do so at their own peril.
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1198631 · Replies: 34 · Views: 5,004

Bluedart
Posted on: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 - 10:02


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (Lynnzer @ Wed, 3 Aug 2016 - 09:47) *
QUOTE (Bluedart @ Wed, 3 Aug 2016 - 08:26) *
QUOTE (Lynnzer @ Tue, 2 Aug 2016 - 21:53) *
Thank God I'm an atheist.........


Me too!
From what I can see, religions cause more problems than they solve. And what religion is causing the most problems at the moment?

Any religion that presents itself as the only way forward is dangerous. Any country that allows itself to be hijacked by a religion to rule the country by is not only dangerous, it threatens the existence of any country it has no control over and demands change according to the religious ambitions they follow themselves. The Archbishop of Canterbury gave an indication that Shariah Law was OK by him and should run alongside the British legal system. How wrong he was.

Personally I don't give a $hit about schools taking pork off the menu, preventing bacon butties being served or putting other onerous conditions on the lives of the believers. That's down to them.

My own grandson would kill for a juicy pear or a carrot for lunch. He turns his nose up at "ordinary food". He's only 2 and a half years old so if his nursery prohibited the serving of fruit I'd feel very peed off about it. However if for some reason they allowed him to eat a food that he has shown a dislike of previously then that's fine. At that sort of age they aren't old enough to understand why they can't eat pork.

I really think the whole crusade of positive discrimination has gone way too far as well.

I used to be a member of the World Sea Angling Forum a couple of years ago. Then I was banned, or as near to it as possible without having access denied. And why was that?
You may ask.

I added a comment about a little known species that I found particularly funny.
It's called the Porkfish and is a member of the Grunt family.

There was no intent to even bring a religious aspect into the topic but the reaction was immediate.
I was a racist.

Well F*** them. I haven't been on forum since.

No religion is better than another. No religion is based on anything other than myth and superstition and they all belong in the dark ages. That said, those who use their belief to the good of the public, or draw strength from it without it interfering with others who don't want it thrust in their face is fine too.

I used to invite the occasional Jehovah's into the house from time to time so they could explain why the lion on the front of the Watchtower wouldn't eat the little girl holding it on a leash while she walked hand in hand with her family members.
I also tried to draw them on the theory of evolution and have them explain why the world is only six thousand years old.
Blind faith, my friend, is surely something that has transcended from the caveman. Oh, I forgot there were no such people were there?

Anyway my "discussions" worked well for me. They don't knock on my door now.


QUOTE
My own grandson would kill for a juicy pear or a carrot for lunch.
An I ould kill for the Nobel Peace prize biggrin.gif
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1198622 · Replies: 37 · Views: 5,138

Bluedart
Posted on: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 - 07:26


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (Lynnzer @ Tue, 2 Aug 2016 - 21:53) *
Thank God I'm an atheist.........


Me too!
From what I can see, religions cause more problems than they solve. And what religion is causing the most problems at the moment?
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1198574 · Replies: 37 · Views: 5,138

Bluedart
Posted on: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 19:11


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (Neil B @ Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 19:42) *
Nooooo, you're dodging again: Where is 'the world according to bluedart', per this >
QUOTE (Bluedart @ Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 09:15) *
in my opinion can be taken as an explanation as to what we are faced with in this world today.

What's that then?
Is it that you need to know why people are not getting uptight about articles such as those you've posted?
I think that's already been answered hasn't it?


Read your comics.
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1196451 · Replies: 37 · Views: 5,138

Bluedart
Posted on: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 14:05


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (Neil B @ Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 13:43) *
QUOTE (Bluedart @ Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 13:11) *
QUOTE (Neil B @ Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 12:49) *
QUOTE (Bluedart @ Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 12:33) *
Perhaps this news paper is more to your liking?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/shopping-a...us-reasons.html

Another one that does exactly the same; inserting the caveat (this time quite early on) confirming the headline is, again, untrue.

Clearly they've got you hook, line and sinker; you just read things as you want (or is it need?) them to be true.
Quite amazing.


I am not hooked, quite the opposite.

How quick come the reasons for approving what we like!
Jane Austen (1775-1817)

And I have put the source first time around.

What news papers do you take notice of then, could it be the daily star?

None particularly.
Your attempt to belittle by suggesting I read a 'comic' is just pathetic.
You are the one who keeps posting links to utter tosh and you ignore the fact that both of the last two even stated so.

You clearly have an underlying agenda, so state it rather then referencing tosh. Let's hear you; the world according to bluedart.



I can see why news papers are dying out because you like many others cannot form your own opinion of their content and probably do not read them for what they are worth.

Reading comics is one thing, but reading a news paper is another and you haven't told the world what newspapers you read or what parts of them you do not agree with. You are like me entitled to your own opinion, if you do not like what I say get a baby sitter.

I have no hidden agenda
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1196350 · Replies: 37 · Views: 5,138

Bluedart
Posted on: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 12:11


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (Neil B @ Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 12:49) *
QUOTE (Bluedart @ Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 12:33) *
Perhaps this news paper is more to your liking?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/shopping-a...us-reasons.html

Another one that does exactly the same; inserting the caveat (this time quite early on) confirming the headline is, again, untrue.

Clearly they've got you hook, line and sinker; you just read things as you want (or is it need?) them to be true.
Quite amazing.


I am not hooked, quite the opposite.

How quick come the reasons for approving what we like!
Jane Austen (1775-1817)

And I have put the source first time around.

What news papers do you take notice of then, could it be the daily star?
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1196316 · Replies: 37 · Views: 5,138

Bluedart
Posted on: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 11:33


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (Fredd @ Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 10:46) *
QUOTE (Bluedart @ Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 09:15) *
I haven't heard of anyone dying through eating pork, it is just a religious thing not a life threatening thing.

Trichinosis? There's generally a practical reason for historically based food preferences and proscriptions existing, even if they're no longer necessary for food safety reasons.

QUOTE (Bluedart @ Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 10:10) *

So what's the issue here? Pork being replaced with other meat to accommodate the 20% of the students for whom it's a problem? The animal welfare implications of halal slaughter methods? The fundamental right to consume fat and gristle sticks at lunchtime? 30 years ago people weren't sharpening their pitchforks and manning the barricades to stop Shepherd's Pie being taken off the menu to make way for a vegetarian option, which leads me to suspect that food choices aren't the problem here at all.

QUOTE (Bluedart @ Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 10:10) *
Where would we all be without education?

Relying on the Daily Mail and it's highly accurate and objective reporting to inform our opinions, I would imagine.


Perhaps this news paper is more to your liking?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/shopping-a...us-reasons.html
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1196298 · Replies: 37 · Views: 5,138

Bluedart
Posted on: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 09:10


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (Fredd @ Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 09:23) *
Andy pretty much nailed it (apart from the last sentence, although no doubt there are plenty of conspiracy theorists who'd consider the moderators being part of a global Muslim conspiracy to suppress Western thought to be the most obvious explanation). The only reason for leaving the thread in place in the first place was that the hoax was immediately identified as such and debunked.

In the last (deleted) post I didn't pay much attention past "Now the decision as to whether or not is a hoax is immaterial, I asked if anyone could deny it", which in conjunction with moving straight on to another "they're forcing their ideas on our culture" story led me to believe that this thread was just going to continue to be an uninformed anti-Muslim rant. Admittedly looking back at the post it seems that this second story was at least based on a genuine news item (although a source would have been useful), but unless I've completely misunderstood the meaning of the "hoax is immaterial" comment I still consider that closing the thread was the right action.


Here it is.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-25...halal-meat.html

Some people do like to bury their heads in the sand instead of trying to broaden their horizons. Take things for what they are worth and leave others to form their own opinion.
Where would we all be without education?
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1196240 · Replies: 37 · Views: 5,138

Bluedart
Posted on: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 08:15


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388


QUOTE (andy_foster @ Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 01:44) *
I can't answer this directly, but the deleted post contained quotes from a fairly reputable source (albeit unattributed in the post)- unlike the original post which was pure hogwash. Why the last post was deleted but the thread as a whole wasn't makes little sense when assessed at leisure, but the mods/admin have a lot of cr*p to tidy up in their own time, and are liable to be a bit arbitrary from time to time. However, as both quotes were unattributed, and the first one was utter bullsh*t, it would perhaps not have been unreasonable to assume that the last one was too.

Personally (back when I was a mod) I would have deleted the thread on sight for being an internet hoax, and sent you a message about posting cr*p from an unreliable source without taking any steps to confirm it. No matter what the underlying merits are (or are not), posting bullsh*t only proves that you are full of it.

Whilst it takes far longer to explain why a post was deleted, than to simply delete it off hand, I used to find that combining the explanation/warning with a policy of banning those that persisted made life easier.

It is worrying how people who I know to be quite capable and cynical fall for obvious hoaxes so easily when the hoaxes support their views.

Alternatively, the site's admin/mods might have been radicalised (after selling out to the authorities) and are simply stamping out any unjustified criticism of their religion of peace by unworthy infidels.


It may be hogwash, but there are parts that make sense. We are all supposed to know what we are eating, but in many cases we are not.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-35...ut-allergy.html

And things like that are happening all over the world.

I haven't heard of anyone dying through eating pork, it is just a religious thing not a life threatening thing.

If anyone considers the content (all of it) to be hog-wash, or bullsh*t, they have formed their own opinion. But some of it in my opinion can be taken as an explanation as to what we are faced with in this world today.
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1196228 · Replies: 37 · Views: 5,138

Bluedart
Posted on: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 - 00:10


Member
Group Icon

Group: Life Member
Posts: 5,243
Joined: 9 Jul 2004
From: Devon
Member No.: 1,388



A post was labelled, "Can you deny it?"
The last post/reply has been has been locked by I assume by an unknown moderator, so much for transparency.

What is/was the reason to lock it?
  Forum: The Flame Pit · Post Preview: #1196204 · Replies: 37 · Views: 5,138

185 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 

New Posts  New Replies
No New Posts  No New Replies
Hot topic  Hot Topic (New)
No new  Hot Topic (No New)
Poll  Poll (New)
No new votes  Poll (No New)
Closed  Locked Topic
Moved  Moved Topic
 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 18:50
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.