PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

THIRD WIN OUT OF 3 AT POPLA AGAINST NPS
busman
post Thu, 12 Apr 2018 - 00:17
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 681
Joined: 11 Oct 2006
From: stapleford,nottingham
Member No.: 8,176



Mid last year,I parked up at Cross street retail park,Long Eaton,Nottingham,NG10.I overstayed my welcome and got a ticket in the post.I appealed to Northern Parking Services but it was refused.I appealed at POPLA and won.Late last year,a work colleague got a ticket,same palce,still the same NPS.I did a letetr of appeal for him but NPS rejected that,so it went to POPLA.They allowed the appeal(result in february 2018).The latest one was for a pensioner friend of mine.same place,same NPS,same appeal refusal.POPLA allowed the appeal on the basis that NPS's contract with the land owner was dated 5th April 2015.The contravention occured on 2 jan.2018.Ashlea Forshaw,the adjudicator stated "AS the witness statement does not state how long the contract is valid for,or if this is a rolling contract,I cannot determine that the operatorstill had permission to operate and issue parking charges on the land,on the date the appellant parked.As such,the operator failed to prove that it still has the required authority to operate on the land in question,and has failed to meet the requirements set out in sch.7 of the bpa code of practice.I note the appellant has raised other issues as grounds of appeal.however,as I have allowed the appeal, for this reason,I did not consider them.Accordingly,I must allow this appeal".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 3)
Advertisement
post Thu, 12 Apr 2018 - 00:17
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
rich2568
post Mon, 23 Jul 2018 - 19:35
Post #2


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 28
Joined: 23 Jul 2018
Member No.: 99,032



Did you visibly see the "NPS Contract" between NPS and the Land Owner?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
busman
post Sun, 29 Jul 2018 - 22:14
Post #3


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 681
Joined: 11 Oct 2006
From: stapleford,nottingham
Member No.: 8,176



I did.It was in their POPLA pack.It was the POPLA adjudicator who said they do not believe that their contract is still valid as it did not have any length of time remaining on it.Basically, a use by date,I suppose.And because of this "Error", POPLA came to their decision.
I bet NCP now have a new contract with the land owner, and with a "Use by " date included.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
roythebus
post Tue, 7 Aug 2018 - 13:42
Post #4


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 5,266
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
From: Near Calais
Member No.: 9,683



Better not overstay again in there! smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Wednesday, 19th September 2018 - 02:17
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.