Smart Parking - Parking Charge Notice, £60 for 15 minutes wait time at Portsmouth Ferry Port |
Smart Parking - Parking Charge Notice, £60 for 15 minutes wait time at Portsmouth Ferry Port |
Wed, 14 Feb 2018 - 20:00
Post
#1
|
|
New Member Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 14 Feb 2018 Member No.: 96,553 |
A parking penalty notice for £60 from Smart Parking Ltd. They want to charge the driver for the time they were in the car park opposite the Portmouth ferry port on the afternoon of the 21st January. The period for which the driver was in the car park was 15:40:32 until 15:55:18. It should be obvious to Smart Parking given the location of the car park that the driver was either dropping off or picking up. Since their own rules made it impossible for the driver's passenger to use the car park for the weekend the passenger had little choice but to park nearby. This of course meant the driver had to wait for him whilst the passenger collected his vehicle so that they could unload his kit on their return from the IOW.
The driver intends to appeal this as £60 for 15 minutes is nothing short of usurious. Many thanks KofN This post has been edited by KnightofNii: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 - 23:16 |
|
|
Advertisement |
Wed, 14 Feb 2018 - 20:00
Post
#
|
Advertise here! |
|
|
|
Wed, 14 Feb 2018 - 20:37
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 4,126 Joined: 31 Jan 2018 Member No.: 96,238 |
Never tell Smart who the driver was
Their paperwork is defective and doesn't meet the legal requirements to recover payment from the registered keeper instead |
|
|
Wed, 14 Feb 2018 - 21:31
Post
#3
|
|
New Member Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 14 Feb 2018 Member No.: 96,553 |
In what way is Smart's paperwork defective?
KofN This post has been edited by KnightofNii: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 - 23:17 |
|
|
Wed, 14 Feb 2018 - 21:37
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 41,510 Joined: 25 Aug 2011 From: Planet Earth Member No.: 49,223 |
What should I be saying to Smart in order to make them see sense? The only thing that will make them see sense is their 'defective' paperwork. They will reject anything you say however genuine it is. They do not use the Protection of Freedoms Act to pursue the keeper. So you appeal this. If they do reject, POPLA will uphold. If you try anything else they will reject, POPLA will agree and you have 6 years to see if they raise a claim. ...not going to compound matters by lying. There's no lying involved. Simply that they've failed to engage keeper liability - they would have to show who was driving. You're not going to tell them, are you? -------------------- RK=Registered Keeper, OP=Original Poster (You!), CoFP=Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty, NtK=Notice to Keeper, NtD=Notice to Driver
PoFA=Protection of Freedoms Act, SAC=Safety Awareness Course, NIP=Notice of Intended Prosecution, ADR=Alternative Dispute Resolution PPC=Private Parking Company, LBCCC=Letter Before County Court Claim, PII=Personally Identifiable Information, SAR=Subject Access Request Private Parking - remember, they just want your money and will say almost anything to get it. |
|
|
Wed, 14 Feb 2018 - 21:39
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 277 Joined: 29 Aug 2017 Member No.: 93,755 |
Oh Dear
Change all your posts to delete who was driving. they CAN chase the driver. If they dont know who the driver was they chase the RK but if you read the post above you will note that their notices are defective in that respect. Just change it to The DRIVER did this...the DRIVER saw that DO NOT in any way shape or form either written verbal or email tell them who was behind the wheel. They rely on people like you to stay in business You are not lying when you use the third person ? ( English grammar not my strong point) BUT dont offer yourself up with out a fight. You came on here for advice. Please take a while to see what the guys on here tell you to do AND do it by the letter. otherwise your wallet will take the hit Others more learned than i in these matters will set you straight HTH |
|
|
Wed, 14 Feb 2018 - 22:39
Post
#6
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 17,088 Joined: 8 Mar 2013 Member No.: 60,457 |
Have you even bothered to read other threads on here where everybody is told to not identify the driver? Just use the words "the driver...." etc.
You have a winnable case but will forfeit the win if you continue to identify the driver. Post up the NTK you received, then get editing. You will lose the chance to edit in a short time. This post has been edited by ostell: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 - 22:43 |
|
|
Wed, 14 Feb 2018 - 23:23
Post
#7
|
|
New Member Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 14 Feb 2018 Member No.: 96,553 |
OK, the keeper will scan and upload the NTK (with all identifying information removed)
KofN This post has been edited by KnightofNii: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 - 18:03 |
|
|
Thu, 15 Feb 2018 - 08:41
Post
#8
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 28,687 Joined: 27 Nov 2007 Member No.: 15,642 |
No, the driver does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING
The KEEPER, you, does everything Again, get out your thread and READ. |
|
|
Thu, 15 Feb 2018 - 09:43
Post
#9
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 17,088 Joined: 8 Mar 2013 Member No.: 60,457 |
Leave the dates visible
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Friday, 29th March 2024 - 05:46 |