The 'willing to go to jail to avoid speeding' thread |
The 'willing to go to jail to avoid speeding' thread |
Wed, 13 Jun 2018 - 09:48
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 56,196 Joined: 9 Sep 2003 From: Warwickshire Member No.: 317 |
Maybe rather than keep starting posts we can put them into one as a warning to others
Two speeding events, not his van honest guvnor, jailed for 6 months. And from the archives under the status of legendary Andy Roo (ex of this parish) Chris Huhne and the ex Mrs Huhne And a future volunteer it seems This post has been edited by The Rookie: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 - 09:50 -------------------- There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!
S172's Rookies 1-0 Kent Council PCN's Rookies 1-0 Warwick Rookies 1-0 Birmingham PPC PCN's Rookies 10-0 PPC's |
|
|
Mon, 11 Feb 2019 - 17:01
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 25,726 Joined: 28 Jun 2010 From: Area 51 Member No.: 38,559 |
This one is of the "let's mount a jammer where the police can see it" school of thought.
3 months and £1,500 as a result. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-66...device-BMW.html |
|
|
Tue, 12 Feb 2019 - 16:29
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 2,356 Joined: 30 Jun 2008 From: Landan Member No.: 20,731 |
This one is of the "let's mount a jammer where the police can see it" school of thought. 3 months and £1,500 as a result. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-66...device-BMW.html No indication in the Daily Fail (as per normal) as to what he did that had a tendency to pervert, and which was or was intended to pervert, the course of public justice, which had followed the occurence of an event from which it could reasonably have been expected that an investigation would follow. Nor whether he was found guilty or (more likely) he had admitted the charges. --Churchmouse |
|
|
Tue, 12 Feb 2019 - 19:02
Post
#4
|
||||
Webmaster Group: Root Admin Posts: 8,205 Joined: 30 Mar 2003 From: Wokingham, UK Member No.: 2 |
No indication in the Daily Fail (as per normal) as to what he did that had a tendency to pervert, and which was or was intended to pervert, the course of public justice, which had followed the occurence of an event from which it could reasonably have been expected that an investigation would follow. Nor whether he was found guilty or (more likely) he had admitted the charges. --Churchmouse He pleaded guilty. And since he was caught by virtue of causing a speed camera to generate an error code, it wouldn't have been that hard to make the case that it was PCoJ. -------------------- Regards,
Fredd __________________________________________________________________________
|
|||
|
||||
Tue, 12 Feb 2019 - 22:19
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 1,333 Joined: 28 Mar 2014 From: Corby Member No.: 69,758 |
And since he was caught by virtue of causing a speed camera to generate an error code, it wouldn't have been that hard to make the case that it was PCoJ. Are there any other offences out there that result on a charge of PCoJ if someone chooses to not pay a [private] third party company for the privilege of sitting in a room with other willing occupants - even if what they were doing at the time was not an offence? Police regard active interference with speed cameras as interfering with an investigation, ie interfering with the course of justice.... courts seem to agree. What counts as an investigation? Is it an investigation into the conduct of that driver, or the conduct of everyone - and at what time? If someone didn't know that they were under investigation of a sexual offence and they washed their clothes, is that PCoJ? Plus, if video footage is being kept, there's nothing to say that the video itself cannot be used to derive speed. /rant This post has been edited by typefish: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 - 22:28 |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: Thursday, 28th March 2024 - 12:51 |