PePiPoo Helping the motorist get justice Support health workers

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Tower Hamlet Code 27, Code 27
EssexGB
post Mon, 3 Aug 2020 - 15:41
Post #1


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 108
Joined: 8 Sep 2017
Member No.: 93,916



Hi to every one and hope everyone keeping safe and well.

I parked in the residential area on single yellow on Sunday the 26th July while I was visiting elderly family member for the first time since covid 19.


I have posted a links of both side of pcn, Kindly advise if I have ground to appeal, I used to park on same spot before covid 19 whenever i visited elderly family member back in March.







I have added couple of pics I took on the day and also GSV link.

https://www.instantstreetview.com/@51.51319...h,-29.55p,1.86z

I always received good advise here in the past and hoping the same this time.
</a> <a href="https://imgbox.com/avdaYeJe" target="_blank">

</a>

[url=https://ibb.co/nL0755b]


Thankyou

This post has been edited by EssexGB: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 - 18:52
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 19)
Advertisement
post Mon, 3 Aug 2020 - 15:41
Post #


Advertise here!









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
PASTMYBEST
post Mon, 3 Aug 2020 - 17:35
Post #2


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 26,655
Joined: 6 Nov 2014
Member No.: 74,048



There is tactile paving on either side of the road so it looks like a pedestrian crossing to assist disabled people but the whole of the street seems to have kerbs level with the carriageway No signs are needed but it should be clear IMO an adjudicator would most likely find that it is


--------------------
All advice is given freely. It is given without guarantee and responsibility for its use rests with the user
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EssexGB
post Mon, 3 Aug 2020 - 17:45
Post #3


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 108
Joined: 8 Sep 2017
Member No.: 93,916



Thankyou for reply.
There is another tactile paving at the end of road only few meters away. Hopefully anyone else can shed more light and assist further.
Thankyoua
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stamfordman
post Mon, 3 Aug 2020 - 18:01
Post #4


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23,582
Joined: 12 Feb 2013
From: London
Member No.: 59,924



You should pay the discount - a tactile crossing is a slam dunk contravention although they shouldn't put single yellows there.

Your image links don't work so can't check the PCN.

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5132983,-0....6384!8i8192

This post has been edited by stamfordman: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 - 18:02
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EssexGB
post Mon, 3 Aug 2020 - 18:30
Post #5


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 108
Joined: 8 Sep 2017
Member No.: 93,916



Thankyou.
Tinypiv is not free anymore which I normally use which is why I used imgbox. Its showing fine in my post. I will try uploading the link again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stamfordman
post Mon, 3 Aug 2020 - 18:32
Post #6


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23,582
Joined: 12 Feb 2013
From: London
Member No.: 59,924



Put pics on https://imgbb.com - much better.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EssexGB
post Mon, 3 Aug 2020 - 18:36
Post #7


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 108
Joined: 8 Sep 2017
Member No.: 93,916



I have posted a new link in OP at the bottom, if it still doesn't work than I will use imgbb as Stamfordman suggested.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stamfordman
post Mon, 3 Aug 2020 - 18:51
Post #8


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23,582
Joined: 12 Feb 2013
From: London
Member No.: 59,924



Have you blanked the location on the PCN.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EssexGB
post Mon, 3 Aug 2020 - 18:53
Post #9


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 108
Joined: 8 Sep 2017
Member No.: 93,916



I think, I have. Its St. Marks Street. I have uploaded pcn and the pictures I took again

This post has been edited by EssexGB: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 - 18:54
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cp8759
post Mon, 3 Aug 2020 - 19:56
Post #10


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 38,006
Joined: 3 Dec 2010
Member No.: 42,618



The PCN should have been issued for 28 - Parked in a special enforcement area on part of the carriageway raised to meet the level of a footway, cycle track or verge IMO.


--------------------
If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EssexGB
post Tue, 4 Aug 2020 - 20:34
Post #11


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 108
Joined: 8 Sep 2017
Member No.: 93,916



Gents, I reckon the best is to pay within discount period?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stamfordman
post Wed, 5 Aug 2020 - 09:14
Post #12


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23,582
Joined: 12 Feb 2013
From: London
Member No.: 59,924



QUOTE (EssexGB @ Tue, 4 Aug 2020 - 21:34) *
Gents, I reckon the best is to pay within discount period?



CP has a point about the code 28, which is different from code 27 in that it concerns a raised carriageway which does seem to be the case here as there looks to be a ramp at the start of the street.

I think this may be worth a no-risk challenge.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EssexGB
post Wed, 5 Aug 2020 - 15:04
Post #13


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 108
Joined: 8 Sep 2017
Member No.: 93,916



Thankyou Stamfordman,

Makes sense @ no risk challenge.

Can some one kindly create a draft letter for me so that I can challenge it online as I still have couple of days within discount period.
Much appreciated.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EssexGB
post Fri, 7 Aug 2020 - 13:50
Post #14


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 108
Joined: 8 Sep 2017
Member No.: 93,916



Hi everyone,

Just to update that I have made informal challenge online raising 2 reasons.
There shouldn't have been single yellow linea
And secondly contravention code 28 instead of 27.

I have nothing to lose.
Will update here once I received reply
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cp8759
post Tue, 11 Aug 2020 - 20:19
Post #15


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 38,006
Joined: 3 Dec 2010
Member No.: 42,618



Once you get the rejection (they will reject) put it up so we can take a look, also restore the PCN and CEO photos which have been taken down.

Also while you're at it, please post a copy of your representation. I would have drafted something for you but it's been a busy few days however IMO they cannot get away with code 27 when blatantly it's a code 28.


--------------------
If you would like assistance with a penalty charge notice, please post a thread on https://www.ftla.uk/index.php
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EssexGB
post Tue, 11 Aug 2020 - 20:41
Post #16


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 108
Joined: 8 Sep 2017
Member No.: 93,916



Thankyou for reply.
I understand that, I had to send challenge quickly because it was day 13.i will post everything again here once I get rejection letter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EssexGB
post Sat, 12 Sep 2020 - 09:04
Post #17


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 108
Joined: 8 Sep 2017
Member No.: 93,916



Hi every one,
I received rejection letter yesterday on the 11th.
I have uploaded original pcn, GSV link pictures and rejection letter for further advise. Thanx











GSV Link

https://www.instantstreetview.com/@51.51319...1h,-6.33p,1.86z

Rejection Letter





I do not have the exact wording of informal challenge I sent since I did it online however it was very brief mentioning only 2 points.
1. Contravention did not occur however if enforcement officer think that it did than it should have been under code 28 not code 27.(description Of both codes)
2. There should have been signs alerting drivers not to park (this reason was silly I know)


I was not blocking or even Infront of any house or property as can be seen in pictures which is mentioned in rejection letter.
I appreciate feedback whether to go all the way or cough up and pay while discount period is still valid.

Thankyou

This post has been edited by EssexGB: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 - 09:17
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stamfordman
post Sat, 12 Sep 2020 - 09:32
Post #18


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 23,582
Joined: 12 Feb 2013
From: London
Member No.: 59,924



Did you say that the carriageway has been raised or did you just say 28 instead of 27. They haven't addressed it anyway.

Codes 27/28 are also not just about blocking entrances.

They say unable to cancel.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EssexGB
post Sat, 12 Sep 2020 - 10:28
Post #19


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 108
Joined: 8 Sep 2017
Member No.: 93,916



I quoted the code 27 description and code 28 description mentioning raised carriage way but it isn't mentioned in rejection letter. They only replied in rejection letter regarding the point 2 about the signs as you said.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PASTMYBEST
post Sat, 12 Sep 2020 - 10:38
Post #20


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 26,655
Joined: 6 Nov 2014
Member No.: 74,048



QUOTE (EssexGB @ Sat, 12 Sep 2020 - 11:28) *
I quoted the code 27 description and code 28 description mentioning raised carriage way but it isn't mentioned in rejection letter. They only replied in rejection letter regarding the point 2 about the signs as you said.


see

http://bit.ly/2tPN3lk


--------------------
All advice is given freely. It is given without guarantee and responsibility for its use rests with the user
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Advertisement

Advertise here!

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: Friday, 29th March 2024 - 08:46
Pepipoo uses cookies. You can find details of the cookies we use here along with links to information on how to manage them.
Please click the button to accept our cookies and hide this message. We’ll also assume that you’re happy to accept them if you continue to use the site.
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here